I developed a baccarat strategy that seems to work very well.

Every day i walk in to the casino and buy in for $250. I play $25 hands of baccarat. I bet on banker to start. Try to enter the game on a hand won by player, if I can. First time I lose I increase my bet to $50, second time to $75. I don’t increase it past $75 if I keep losing. Once I win I go back to $25. My goal is to win $100. As soon as I am up $100 I leave the casino. I do not keep gambling. I also never re buy after I lose. Ive hit 6 days in a row since starting the strategy.

Join us in Agartha bro. Stop thinking about Zion Don and come to Agartha.

If I have won 2-3 in a row as banker I will switch to player for one hand

Explain Baccarat

>>512668468 (OP)
yeah with that strategy you have about a 70% chance to win $100 and a 30% chance to lose $250. you got lucky this week but it will even out in the end. quit while you're ahead.

>>512668688
You decide to bet on the banker or the player. Each is dealt a 2 card hand. You are trying to get a 9. All cards are face value, except face cars which are 0. and you add them up whoever is closer to 9. Both the player and the banker can draw a card if their score is low but this is done according to the rules - you the gambler does not have any input on this both player and banker must hit if their score is lower than a certain level.

>>512668956
Ok, I just looked into it. I get it.

But what about when you keep betting higher and eventually win back $25+.

So you are $25+ up now. How do you get to $100?

>>512669134
You bet another hand at $25

>>512669178
So the assumption is eventually you will get a winning streak?

And if you lose, you bet higher in $25 increments until you get back your $25 profit?

So what are you doing in the subsequent winnign hands? always betting banker or player?

>>512668468 (OP)
Tight dude.

>>512669287
I stick with banker since they are statistically more likely to win, slightly, on any given hand. Once the banker wins 2-3 hands in a row I switch to player for one hand

>>512669487
I just ran a simulator and got tie 3x and play 2x and lost all my money betting on banker

>>512669287
The assumption is that since it’s a pretty 50/50 game, and the banker is slightly more likely to win, that if you hedge your losses by increasing the bet you can make up for multiple losses with one win

>>512669599
but wouldnt red/black on roulette simply be superior for true 50/50

>>512668468 (OP)
Gambling addicts are biggest losers of all the addicts.

>>512669726
No because 2 and sometimes 3 zeroes exist on a roulette board. You are giving away around 5% on every spin of roulette

>>512669848
But banker takes 5%

>>512670113
Pretty sure they don’t do that unless you’re betting $100 or more a hand