>>512751875 (OP)He correctly identifies the originating cause for the West's decline. Jews (in particular), elites, the rich, non-whites, immigrants, nationalists, anti-racists, communists, left, right, etc. all contribute to the decline. However, it was the boomers that kickstarted and allowed the excesses of all of these. They were supposed to be a vanguard against much of these, especially when they became a noticeable issue, but they did not do the usual duty of the older generation. The younger generations won't do much about them since, for most, you'd be cannibalizing your own parents or grandparents and don't even have the means to do so if you wanted to.
His actual argumentations may appear basic or off the mark to some, but you need to read those seemingly dull points as more of a general brief characterization rather than precise descriptions.
It's all a very enjoyable take on the boomer question that both left and right can generally agree on, probably because it's relatively inoffensive.
Overall, I think he does well enough to identify the biggest problem group. Though, that isn't to say that the other groups don't matter a lot in their own niches, some close to the level of boomers like elite jews (with their fellow jew and goy toys) and the institutionally leveraging rich. People who bear almost the same level of responsibility for the decline as boomers..
