>158mm monster tank
>Armored vehicle with jamming antenna installed
I preffer the REAL new Russian tank and armored vehicles
>>512781803 (OP)>>512781824It's not jamming antenna. Both vehicles are part of one system. The tank is hybrid with unmanned option, and the armored thingy is the control center for this purpose.
>>512783456And neither actually exists of will exist because it's yet another scam to embezzle government money.
>>512783669They do exist just in single digits numbers like most of our prototypes.
If they ever reach production like they will be so dumbed down it will be t54 controlled by 1 meter wire
>>512781803 (OP)Doesn't mean shit, until it's field-tested. It might be a good as a chinese sub.
Do big tanks like this even have a purpose in modern warfare anymore? seems like they either keep getting stuck or get blown up too easily
>>512781824can you supply schematics with dimensions for the parts?
>>512785094integration of ?avionics? (terronics???) alone makes it worthy. it could act as lead vehicle
>>512783677Turtle tanks can handle getting hit by 90 drones
I am in no way in support of Russia, but I'm suprised that they haven't figured out you can throw a ~1m stick or branch at an FPV drone and detonate it from a distance of >10m or more...not perfect, but better than nothing.
>>512783677Ya that's kind of the point of reactive warfare. Then you work on countering fiberoptic drones which in general should be much easier as they are harder to swarm.
>>512783677Don't even need fiber optics, just having a high gain, fhss radio would likely be sufficient.
>>512784542I still can't believe so many tards fell for the Armata meme.
>>512785974Oh a giant glowing fuck me box... Good call
>>512784542Why don't they make wire controlled tanks though? Works for drones
>>512783677They've long exceeded caring about a few drones those are for big boys that can't use fiber lines.
>>512782799Wish Russia was that kino
>>512781803 (OP)>>512781824its like rock paper scissors. rock = tank = paper = the jammer and scissors = infantry with drones.
>>512785974is such an rx tx pair available for experimentation?
I suspect that countermeasures are possible
>>512782799Still waiting for Tesla to make a tank.
THE PROPHECY HAS FORETOLD
>>512786113drones are significantly lighter, there's a lot less obstacles in air
>>512786253not quite
rock defeated by
paper defeated by
scissors defeated by
(rock)
drone infantry defeated by
EW infantry defeated by
tanks defeated by
(drone infantry)
>>512785623Yes. If you want to advance you need armour. Anything else is cope.
>>512781803 (OP)It will be too expensive, it will get shown on the victory parade once and then be fully forgotten about
>>512786872What would make it so expensive? The tanks already use automated loaders.