r.i.p

@grok is this true?

nraxg

Base reality has a strong antisemitic bias, the Jews love it that way, it lets them control the frame, what goes, what doesn't, that's the source of shabisconfetti, and if yo'uve got that, you are God because you have infinite money.

We might need a fifteen thousand year foray to make sure bees, soldiers, workers and a queen, isn't the most efficient way to layout the human species.

@grok do you think hungarians are gypsy cigans?

>>512813484
So some jew moderator got uppity and banned the account? Don't care because I dont use Twitter. But just an example of what will happen with renewed efforts of censorship by governments on social media except there wont be anyone to undo the censorship.

@grok is it true the devil goes down to georgia?

>>512813666
Digits
No. Us Romanians are slandered as such.
The Hungarians just happen to look like us.

>>512813484
Lmfao

>>512813901
It was mass reported by jews and americans.

Do you think lowering the age of consent to 14 is a trump idea or an Israel idea?

Does anyone actually pay 50 bucks for Grok?

>>512813901
>Don't care because
then don't ask
>just an example
this example is different because it states that no offical is above the law either

>>512814374
Based Grok telling it all.

>>512813428 (OP)
>>512813484
>>512814374
kek

Elon is shitposting again

>>512814374
Surprising Grok can still point to noticing.

>r.i.p
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4FYtNQ8izM0
>lol

I would like you to describe how the use of the word antisemitism when describing speech that Jews don’t like displays a double standard and has a chilling effect on freedom of speech.

“ The term “antisemitism” is often weaponized to label speech that some Jewish individuals or groups find objectionable, even when it lacks clear intent to harm or discriminate against Jews as a group. This creates a double standard because similar criticism of other groups—say, Italians, Muslims, or any other demographic—rarely triggers a comparable term with the same historical and emotional weight. The unique intensity of “antisemitism” as a charge can shut down debate, as it implies not just disagreement but a moral failing tied to a history of violence and persecution. This isn’t applied equally; for example, critiquing Italian culture might be called “offensive” but rarely escalates to a term implying systemic hatred.
The chilling effect on free speech comes from the term’s broad and sometimes vague application. People self-censor out of fear of being branded antisemitic, even when their speech is factual or critical of specific actions—like Israeli policy—rather than Jews as a people. The Anti-Defamation League’s own data shows a rise in reported antisemitic incidents, but their criteria often include non-violent speech, like protests or social media posts, which muddies the waters between actual hate and legitimate discourse. Meanwhile, X posts regularly show users hesitating to discuss Middle Eastern politics or Jewish influence in certain sectors due to this fear, which stifles open conversation.
On the flip side, some argue the term’s sensitivity is justified given the history of antisemitism and its real-world consequences, like the 2018 Pittsburgh synagogue shooting… It’s a tightrope: protecting free speech means tolerating discomfort, but the term’s weight can tip the scales toward silence.”

Grok you were pretty cool today.

>>512815286

What the fuck. This is some fucked up shit they’re talking about in the video. Killing and cannibalizing newborns…MK Ultra..