/pol/ sure does have regular threads about war featuring gore and promoting this or another side, but i tell you that the best side of any war are the pacifists who rebuke all warring sides and supporters of this or another side.

When you choose a side in a war you're merely fueling the war, that way people are unashamedly promoting carnage and destruction.

Obviously the best stance to take in any war is pacifism. Rebuking all who participate in war and its propagation is the only moral choice in face of war.

>>512873781 (OP)
While commendable, it is naive. If Russia took the pacifist approach then nato would've infiltrated ukraine and absorbed them and their trade and industry into an unfriendly alliance and hurting Russia geopolitical. These are decisions nations must face, and sometimes go to war to defend their territorial integrity and international interests

>>512874109
>If Russia took the pacifist approach then nato would've infiltrated ukraine and absorbed them and their trade and industry into an unfriendly alliance and hurting Russia geopolitical.
All kings in this little season, aside for the LORD JESUS Christ, are under Satan so obviously they can't escape doing the will of that old liar, but i do tell you that there is a King who liveth forevermore and HE caused it to be no war on earth for a thousand years. But for us who are lucky enough not be kings, regardless of our ability to actually stop wars we should obviously take the side of our LORD in rebuking war.