>>513203643 (OP)
It's more or less pointless to repeal it now. It's not like gays are suddenly going to start reproducing with the opposite sex anyway once you tell them they can't get married anymore.

>>513203840
Yeah but it sends the message that sodomy must not be validated. I am sure polygamous people won't stop being polygamous even though it's illegal. But the fact that the state doesn't acknowledge it sends a message.

Even if fag marriage was good, which it is not, it should never have been "back doored" the way it was. The court basically said "yeah...uh the constitution always meant for killing babies and fag marriage". That why the baby killing was outlawed federally again because the original rulling was retarded, just like the fag marriage one.

Marriage the term for when a man joins together with a woman and intends upon monogamy and children. Everyone else can get fucked.

>>513204149
as Aristotle said "The worst form of inequality is to try to make unequal things equal"

>>513203643 (OP)
Yes. It will make identifying them easier in the Reich.

Yes. Fuck religion.

>>513204149
It always bothers me when foreigners talk about our constitutional law.

>>513203643 (OP)
No i don't. I don't support pedos either. RELEASE THE EPSTEIN FILES!

>>513204810
I've been non religious since I was 13 and still think sticking your dick in literal manshit is depraved.

>>513205025
This. Don't need to be religious to realize fag sodomy is immoral.

>>513205178
but you need to be irreligious to know that you shouldnt regulate what consenting adults do behind closed doors

>>513205416
Oh okay then being an atheist means you should also support cuckoldry, bigamy, incest, scat etc.

>>513203643 (OP)
I don't get why gays would even want to be married, other than because in the past they've been told they can't. like a civil union so you get the benefits of a married couple I can understand, but an actual religious wedding?? why would a gay person even want to do that? the Abrahamic religions all say that gays are an abomination and should be put to death, so why would they want to participate in their traditions?

anyways, I don't care if they get married or not, I've got bigger problems to worry about

>>513204884
Then you probably shouldn't post on the politics board of a Japanese anime website. Are you retarded?

>>513203840
Yeah but we acknowledge those marriages legally and let them adopt children and try to emulate normal families.

>>513205416
Fags are more likely to get dangerous STDs.
A bifag can get STDs from men and then spread it to straights when he screws a woman.

>>513203643 (OP)
I also support forced feminization of miggers, it would probably improve their disposition. Get in the maid dress OP

>>513203643 (OP)
i dont know a single married pair of faggots except my grandpa
i know plenty of orgy faggots

>>513206740
You're grandpa is a fag?

>>513206661
they are already doing that kek

>>513203643 (OP)
Yes for pragmatic reasons. I'm ok with all marriage being illegal though. You can practice monogamy without formal agreements.

>>513206889
hell yea
married forever after his wife marriage

>>513203643 (OP)
Yes.

>>513207820
Wait, he's married to a woman or a man?

>>513203643 (OP)
>fag marriage?
that's an oxymoron

>>513205585
Because they are poor
They need civil union for welfare, healthcare, insurance

But fag marriage is unconstitutional because scientifically fags don't reproduce and make children

>>513203643 (OP)
Get rid of marriage entirely for everyone. All it does is give the woman half your money. Get rid of it.

>>513203643 (OP)
This is a win for gay polychads.

>>513203643 (OP)
I support it to the extent that I'd allow religions to practice it. I don't support it enough to force religions to practice it.