Anonymous
ID: IXYByzVj
8/16/2025, 8:58:21 PM No.513220251
I mean from 18-35. If they can't win them over policy, and can't win them with celebrities, their last choice will be to winning over via their lizard-brains.
If they find two 35 year old women, the Presidential Candidate being an Asian girl who would agree to be barefoot her entire campaign (and if she wins, her entire Presidency), as well as a beautiful blonde haired girl as her running mate, then that would turn every single incel and coomer in the country to vote for them, policies be damned (and this means /pol/ actually supporting them). They will also both be single, and thus "available" to their new voting demographic they are pandering to. The logic is, why would they try to win a losing battle instead of appealing to the lizard-brain? As well as eye-candy for the next 4 to 8 years?
This would be a much stronger strategy for Democrats if they wish to win by gaining a new demographic overnight, since their old demographic will still vote for them no matter what (as well as having a diversity pick).
So, what does /pol/ think of that plan?
If they find two 35 year old women, the Presidential Candidate being an Asian girl who would agree to be barefoot her entire campaign (and if she wins, her entire Presidency), as well as a beautiful blonde haired girl as her running mate, then that would turn every single incel and coomer in the country to vote for them, policies be damned (and this means /pol/ actually supporting them). They will also both be single, and thus "available" to their new voting demographic they are pandering to. The logic is, why would they try to win a losing battle instead of appealing to the lizard-brain? As well as eye-candy for the next 4 to 8 years?
This would be a much stronger strategy for Democrats if they wish to win by gaining a new demographic overnight, since their old demographic will still vote for them no matter what (as well as having a diversity pick).
So, what does /pol/ think of that plan?
Replies: