Is it really safe and effective to just live in this shit 24/7

Literally cannot escape it without moving deep into the woods or underground

>>513275866 (OP)
if only you knew what else is frying your brain and gives you dick cancer

>>513275952
Yea maybe but that would change the subject ivan

The sun hits you with more and harder.
2nd hottest signal strength is deep space. 3rd place is the earth itself.
>literally cannot escape.
Go in a metal box.

>>513275866 (OP)
Yes. Wifi is non-ionizing radiation, which means it doesn't have enough energy to break chemical bonds or destroy cells.

>>513276016
Sun isnt pulsed in unnatural megahertz frequencies

>>513275866 (OP)
remember this is just 2 frequency bands (around 2.4 and 5GHz) imagine if you could see all EM radiation as visible light. You would go insane.

>>513276191
Im not concerned with the natural em radiation we were exposed to for millions of years

Its the man made strobe light tier shit thats everywhere that is worrisome. Thats all wifi and bluetooth is, its like a radio strobe light

>>513276131
It's pulsed in all the frequencies

>>513276272
Yeah that's the point being made TO YOU
You don't care about the unfathomable quantities of em radiation (in all frequencices) bombarding you all day every day. You only care about the teeny tiny amount coming out of antennas.

>>513276550
Let me explain it to you like a 5 year old.

I hold a strobe light next to your face. You see and and you dont like me doing it.

I tell you the sun isnt always the same brightness either like a smug asshole.

Replace the strobe light with your wifi router and your face with my face.

Only difference is the wifi radio isnt visible light.

>>513275866 (OP)
your comparable is a power outage. do you notice any difference during one

>>513276796
It depends how far away cell towers are because they have battery back ups, so even in power outages, we are still inundated with man made signals these days

>tfw cant go back to the 18th century and live peacefully in a remote area with a very small number of people who all think critically about everything before implementing it into their daily lives

Just put a microwave on your head, wifi cannot penetrate the Mighty Micro Wall.
Sometimes when I feel sick from from wifi radiation I simply turn on my microwave for 5 minutes with the door open. Kills those frequencies dead! No more wifi, no more headache.
Truly a magical device

>>513279116

>>513276904
So to answer the question, no, you don't notice it.

>>513279862
Go turn on your microwave, open the door, and see if you can post any sick memes from the phone.
It acts like a medical quartz lamp, literally raping those pesky wifi neutrinos to total death.

>>513279970
Thats the most unscientific way to experiment with a no signal environment even if there arent cell towers nearby, even if you felt no different, there are many other factors. Its just a short window without signals, and the damage done by the signals could be cumulative and might take years to recover from, if ever.

I intentionally didnt answer the question because i didnt want to introduce bias in any direction that stemmed from an unscientific premise.

>>513276740
If there were a thousand strobing lights all shining into your face wouldn't that cancel out the strobing and produce a somewhat uniform amount of light? They can't all be in sync, can they?

>>513280300
I cant say, because i wouldnt ever want a thousand strobing lights in my face, just like i dont want to stare at the sun either or sleep in a rave party.

>>513280434
>just like i dont want to stare at the sun either
Unfortunately that's exactly what you're doing every second of the day according to your analogy.

>>513280617
Surrounded by wifi and bluetooth you mean? Yea it could be compared to being flashed with a bunch of strobe lights. Its hard to know the effect they have when you are steeped in them most of your life.

>>513276131
Everything is pulsed and sinewaved in all the frequencies.
You just don't hear the background radiation. You can transform it with a radio and amplify it to hear it, but it's always there.

>>513280868
To say its "always there" is a misnomer. We shield ourselves from the sun throughout the day lessening its intensity, and it goes behind the earth at night as well.

>>513280825
So is staring at the sun okay, but having a thousand strobe lights flashing in your face not okay?

>>513281035
No staring at the sun isnt okay thats why i said i wouldnt want to do it...

>>513281073
But according to your analogy that's what you are doing...

>>513281128
It might be a language problem for you, because i never said that.

>>513281186
You compared the radiowave output of the sun to the visible light output of the sun and a wifi router to a strobe light claiming that looking at a strobe light is worse than looking at the sun. Unless I'm mistaken and you actually don't believe the sun produces radiowaves, but then what the fuck was the strobe light analogy for?

>>513281423
>claiming that looking at a strobe light is worse than looking at the sun

No ivan. The strobe light analogy was to explain that a wifi router isnt just "light" period.

Its often handwaived away as being safe because its just "light". I use the strobe light analogy to explain how just "light" isnt always safe, and in fact can be quite dangerous.

I never brought up the sun, i responded to someone else mentioning the sun. Im educating on multiple fronts simultaneously.

>>513281694
In what way exactly are wifi router emitted radio waves worse than the radio waves emitted by the sun and why did you think analogies constitute valid arguments?

>>513276664
>teeny tiny amount coming out of antennas

Better go take your booster buddy

>>513281694
>wifi router isnt just "light"
You are retarded.
Electromagnetic waves are photons.

>>513281862
>In what way exactly are wifi router emitted radio waves worse than the radio waves emitted by the sun

I never said they were. And to compare the two isnt exactly helpful or relevant. When dealing with em radiation its all about source and strength.

A little flashlight is a trillion billion times less intense than the sun, but you dont want it mounted on your wall 5 feet away shining in your face all night, because its so very close.

Using the sun as a means to justify the flashlight is silly.

>>513275866 (OP)
buy some neutral colored EMR paint and paint it down to the cement. There, a faraday cage that isn't insane looking.

>>513275866 (OP)
That's so much less radiation than what the sun throws at you constantly lmao.

>>513282035
Idiot award is for you.

>>513282243
Okay.
What is light?

>>513282112
A faraday environment is a good option for future exposure, i just hope there isnt permanent damage already.

Once you go blind its usually over. I hope the constant tech em radiation hasnt done some similar type of damage we cant fully understand right now. Im just not arrogant enough to conclude its safe and effective. All of this is very new, this sea of devices emitting as they are.

>>513282109
Except you're always being subjected to the sun's em radiation whether you like it or not, yet you seem to think that's not a problem. So is the problem now that artificial em radiation is "shining in your face" somehow but the sun's em radiation isn't? How's that?
Instead of answering in what way exactly are artificial radio waves worse than natural radio waves you shat out another inane analogy.

>>513282397
not relevant in my opinion. I don't shine a light in your face and when you object rudely ask "what is light???"

I don't care to examine what light is, only how its being used right now.

>>513282584
Can you see the electromagnetic waves that is used for wireless communication?

What abouts sounds you can't hear or feel?

>>513282576
>Except you're always being subjected to the sun's em radiation whether you like it or not

A silly thing to say. We experience the sun in varying intensity throughout the day depending on the time and whether we are shielded from it. And again, the sun is Irrelevant to the discussion, see >>513282109

>>513275866 (OP)
Dude I live in a cabin innawoods.
I leave my place, drive for a mile and I'm still in front of my next door neighbors "yard".
I have 5g in my cabin.

There is no escape.

>>513275952
This thread gonna get sliiiiiiid

>>513282689
>Can you see the electromagnetic waves that is used for wireless communication?

Good question. I dont know if there has been enough good experimentation on that question to have a conclusion right now. We know that IR light can damage the eyes without seeing it, we know that many things invisible have proven hazardous longitudinally and especially when in close long term proximity.

>>513282727
No the sun isn't irrelevant, the sun produces large amounts of radio waves which bombard the earth every second. Someone brought that up and instead of providing an argument why the sun doesn't matter you started coming up with analogies.

>>513275866 (OP)
>Is it really safe and effective
it is %100 not. i believe even if it doesn't affect us directly, its probably disturbing the environment in some unseen way that will bite humans up some day.

>>513282958
>instead of providing an argument why the sun doesn't matter you started coming up with analogies.

Instead of admitting you dont know what you are taking about, you continue debating me.

>>513283169
Why is the sun irrelevant? Why doesn't the sun's radiation matter? You haven't answered that question yet.

>>513283025
>i believe even if it doesn't affect us directly, its probably disturbing the environment in some unseen way

This is a very healthy concern to have i think.

>>513283253
>Why is the sun irrelevant? Why doesn't the sun's radiation matter?

Ive already given you my source/strength explanation here >>513282109

>>513283301
Another analogy and still no straightforward answer. It shouldn't be this difficult to say.

>>513283470
If analogies are the enemy to your learning capacity, i think you might be in for a lot of trouble in becoming educated in most things.

>>513283619
An analogy is not an argument. Analogies are only useful if the other person agrees to believe everything you say and trust that things are the way you say they are because you say so. We are having a debate, I do not agree to just believe everything you say, you have to provide arguments to make me agree with you.

>>513283843
Your main issue is arrogance, its less intellectual and more behavioral.

>>513284116
And now you're trying to find personal faults in me instead of just answering the question I asked.

>>513275866 (OP)
No, this is why we don't see fairies anymore.

You get more radiation from ONE hot shower than 5 years of living in a building woth 200+ routers and wifi networks.

>>513284272
Young sir, im answering the questions you ask in the most helpful way that i believe i can.

>>513278092
This bugs me. Technologically wise, shouldn't we have be able to do that for a fraction of the cost they did back then, to the point it would be affordable for most of us who want to to just do it? Other than land, whose offer never rises, and demand controls the price, that is.

>>513284543
Doesnt look like it will get easier anytime soon unfortunately.

>>513284517
You aren't, unless you really can't provide a straightforward answer to this simple question.

>>513284743
Did you take the vaccine?

>>513284822
And still no answer.
I'll answer your question though. If by "the vaccine" you mean a vaccine against covid19 then no, I haven't. If that wasn't what you meant then please be more clear next time.

>>513285043
Why didnt you take it?

>>513276032
But it does have enough energy to excite rotational moments that may increase protein misfolding rates.

>>513285069
Don't change the subject, we are still talking about the harm of wifi radiation. And you still haven't answered my question as to why the sun's radiation is irrelevant to that discussion.

>>513285199
I think the whole ionizing/non ionizing topic is irrelevant. Light affects people negatively depending on many other factors than just that. Its like the sun debate, its just a tangent. We are discussing specific tech doing specific things that arent something to be compared to anything else and require long term studies to fully appreciate their specific effect. Like all fingerprints are different and leave different traces.

>>513275866 (OP)
Well you’ve got the chart. Just stand in the channel 14 area.

>>513276796
yes, a tree fell on a power line in my neighborhood the other day and when my power went out i could immediately think better, it felt like a straitjacket was taken off my mind. it felt so fucking good like i was human again

>>513276131
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Black-body_radiation

>>513285255
Im trying a different approach, but once again your arrogance is a stumbling block.

>>513275866 (OP)
i don't have any of that shit in my house

Use signal blocking paint on your walls.

>>513285656
You're trying a different approach to avoid answering my question. Answer my question.

>>513276016
Why doesn't it drown out the other signals?

>>513275866 (OP)
Bro, if you think that's bad, check out radio waves. You think it's a coincidence cancer exploded the past 100 years?

>>513285624
Weve evolved with the sun in our lives, we know what kind of exposure gives negative effects through lifetimes of trial and error.

We dont have that with wifi and bluetooth device's in our ass cracks and ears.

>>513285804
Ive answered your questions, you dont like them. You cant just say they are unanswered because of your own poor judgment.

>>513285941
Yeah you only get enough energy from the sun to give you second degree burns

>>513285941
yeah it's such a dumb concept with people that have no idea what they are talking about trying to scare other dumb people

>>513285879
Did you know some germans built "faraday houses" when radio was first introduced there? They had thick copper in the walls because people didnt trust it. Some of those houses still survive here and there.

>>513285879
Couldn't possibly be the fact it was almost undiagnosable and/or undiscovered before 100 years ago

>>513285879
>You think it's just a coincidence no one was ever diagnosed with cancer until humans discovered it's existence?
lol

>>513286148
Yes we know that exposure to the sun can be harmful.

>>513286204
>its scary
Im not the one raking in trillions from the wireless industry, i never asked for all of this either

>>513286463
You really don't think there is any kind of pollution new to the modern world that causes any kind of negative health effects?

>>513286412
Yeah bro, radio waves are totally safe. Ignore the fact that when you touch a radio antenna the signal clears up immediately because you're one big walking antenna from the moment you're conceived until the moment you're dead.

>>513286593
I'm sure there are but compared to things like led lined cups humans were using 2000 years ago I don't think WiFi is an issue

>>513286707
The body is an electrical marvel, when your arm goes to sleep, as it wakes up you feel this gif.

To think that we are immune to the technological noise symphony being built around us more and more everyday is absurd.

>>513275866 (OP)
A signal strength of -80dBm is like 10 nanowatts of power, it's one step away from absolute nothing.

>>513286707
>>513286845
We should never have given the internet to retirement villages

>>513286785

That seems a bit short-sighted.

And it's not 'compared to' it's about whether it's bad at all. It's not like people get to choose 'all forms of modern pollution OR all forms of ancient pollution', we HAVE modern pollution and people just ignore it. If people didn't ignore it, then we would have a chance at not having it.

>>513286785
You retard. You absolute fool. People in 2000 years will look at us like we were stone age savages for not realizing the danger X was posing to us our whole life. Pretty sure lead poisoning wasn't as big an issue then as immune system diseases are now, was it? Did everybody have lead poisoning? Because everybody today has allergies. This isn't in regards to radio waves specifically, just our modern world being a nightmare hellscape.

>>513286983
I have come to the conclusion the conspiracies around wifi and 5G are actually pushed by the US intelligence agency to make Americans content they have access to worse data infrastructure than an Indian dirt farmer

>>513286983
What signal strength are your neurons communicating at?

>>513275866 (OP).>>513275952
I doubt it

Radio station have rf warnings for a reason, and a microwave oven uses that exact same frequency to cook shit

We've found some microwave weapons (not microwave oven but 5g and weapons) cause damage to the eyes in particular, but I can't remember the specifics

>>513287021
Shut the fuck up, retard. Enjoy your body vibrating at a million frequencies every day of your life. Remember when they said cell phones were dangerous then they stopped because it was impacting sales? Now imagine being blasted with low levels of the same shit from pre-birth to death. Yeah bro, I'm sure nothing bad could ever come of that.

>>513287119
More often then not you should look up the analysis that was done on Beethoven's hair

>>513286412
>the fact it was almost undiagnosable and/or undiscovered before 100 years ago
People know they have cancer now because they feel lumps inside them. That's how they diagnose cancer. That's not a new technology. The fact that cancer was undiscovered 100 years ago proves their point.

Signal blocking paint

>>513287283
Meanwhile, every modern child has some kind of life impacting allergy.

>>513287216
Neurons don't communicate on radio frequency, the electrical signaling can produce some detectable electromagnetic signals though like any other electronic equipment.

>>513287283
You remember leaded fuel in cars etc? It was proven to cause lead poisoning decades before it became common, but once it was profitable to sell it people became convinced that the earlier science was wrong and it was harmless. Then after half a century it was 'discovered' to be harmful again and it became illegal.

So we know that in the modern world big polluters who are profiting from rolling out technology or products that cause harm to everyone are able to suppress science and convince people to ignore the harm.

>>513287456
What signal strength are they communicating at?

>>513286412
https://slate.com/technology/2023/10/golden-retriever-lifespan-dying-younger-dog-health.html

>>513287456
Name a single wavelength of light you can stand in front of for long periods and not be affected. But for radio waves we're getting blasted with them from the day we're conceived til the day we die.

>>513287296
>The fact that cancer was undiscovered 100 years ago proves their point
Cancer was first observed by the ancient Greeks over 3000 years ago

>>513287124
>I have come to the conclusion the conspiracies around wifi and 5G are actually pushed by the US intelligence agency

The wireless industry is a trillion dollar enterprise which the intelligence community is heavily invested in and lobbies for.

>>513287671
Observed and prevalent are two different words. Pretty much everyone is gonna get cancer these days.

>>513287677
Yeah and the US has always been in the stone ages we didn't get 3G until it was almost a decade old and we have the least 5G coverage in the developed world

>>513287616
I mean the EM spectrum is technically infinite for low frequency, these waves are outside the physical ability to interact with you.

>>513287829
My point being that it doesnt make sense for intel agencies to sow doubt in their own apparatus investment of choice

>>513287917
Yeah, so you fucking say. If they don't interact with me then why do I act like an antenna when I touch a radio?

>>513287535
You're asking a question that doesn't make sense friend. Neurons operate on aqueous ion impulses.

>>513287970
Yes it does it's making Americans think it's actually a good thing we give all our money to Israel to the point we are so technically behind

>>513288031
Heres some info for you on how it all works

>Membrane potential: The electrical potential across the neuron's cell membrane, which arises due to different distributions of positively and negatively charged ions within and outside of the cell. The value inside of the cell is always stated relative to the outside: -70 mV means the inside is 70 mV more negative than the outside (which is given a value of 0 mV).

>Action potential: Brief (~1 ms) electrical event typically generated in the axon that signals the neuron as 'active'. An action potential travels the length of the axon and causes release of neurotransmitter into the synapse. The action potential and consequent transmitter release allow the neuron to communicate with other neurons.

>Neurotransmitter: A chemical released from a neuron following an action potential. The neurotransmitter travels across the synapse to excite or inhibit the target neuron. Different types of neurons use different neurotransmitters and therefore have different effects on their targets.

>Synapse: The junction between the axon of one neuron and the dendrite of another, through which the two neurons communicate.

>>513275866 (OP)
>he didnt line his walls with tin foil paper

>>513287996
Radio waves are higher frequency tho. Even then you're pushing the limits of what it reasonably means to be affected by something. I mean your body can be charged to thousands of volts just walking across a carpet, there's quite a bit of EMI produced in the process, should we also consider this a possible source of danger?

>>513287279
make me boomer retard

>>513275866 (OP)
I wonder about this too. We have keratin and dead skin cell layers on our skin but our eyes, mouth inside our ears are all exposed to this shit.

>>513288409
So in other words it's impulses of electrochemical energy by aqueous ions... what's your point?

>>513287616
The visible spectrum from a 1W LED

>>513275866 (OP)
EMP them!

>>513288748
Ive asked you what signal strength they communicate at, since you brought up the signal strength of wifi.

Now, we see there is a voltage across the axon of neurons during communication, do you know how ohms law works?

>>513288536
One happens and it's discharged instantly. The other is being blasted into you every second of your fucking life. There's kind of a difference, retard. Even if the affect of radio is negligible, the fact you're getting it from conception to death is still enough time to cause issues to build up. Fact is, every other spectrum of light is considered dangerous to us with over exposure but somehow radio waves don't. Weird.

>>513288806
Even if you stood in front of it 24/7 for 80 years? Are you sure about that?

>>513288918
This is trying to compare electromagnetic radiation strength to electrochemistry. It does not make any sense.

>>513285199
TRVTH NVKE

>>513289055
>It does not make any sense.

Ill repeat myself,

>we see there is a voltage across the axon of neurons during communication, do you know how ohms law works?

it's why they banned lead paint

>>513288987
You are on a giant ball of rock revolving around a nuclear explosion with an equivalent intensity of one trillion 1-megaton bombs exploding per second. You are emersed in EM waves all the time whether you like it or not.

>>513289257
Whoahhh. I guess that does explain why they got rid of it instead of just not making it taste sweet to children.

>>513289394
>Yeah, so what's a few more? Go out and get unnecessary x-rays! Vacation in sunny chernobyl!
Kill yourself.

>>513289043
yeah

>>513289747
No you're not, fuck you.

>>513289713
How much energy does an x-ray have and how much energy does a 2.4Ghz wifi signal have?

>>513289799
How long does an x-ray last vs how long you're getting blasted with wifi?

>>513289868
answer my question

>>513289219
There is an electrochemical potential across a cell wall. Ohms law isn't particularly useful here because the signal isn't sent by passing electrons through a conductor but rather through osmotic principles.

>>513275866 (OP)
unplug everything RIGHT NOW

>>513289624
they didn't give a shit about health, leaded fuel was banned 20 years after the paint

>>513275866 (OP)
Nah but the jews already said it safe and effective. JEWISH SCIENCE denies all biological effects of pulsed EM/RF microwaves, beyond mere dielectric heating. According to the jews, this is safe. As long as you're not getting too hot, you're perfectly fine.

>>513289713
I mean the light from the sun will peel the surface of your skin if you stand in it for too long and you're worrying about the equivalent RF radiation levels you might be exposed to by banging two rocks together.

>>513290132
How do people become so stupid?
Let me point a laser pointer in your eye and use the existence of starts to defend why it's safe. Retards, so many of them,

>>513276141
no need to post cringe
its real and its no longer kept secret by the mic glowniggers
see
https://www.eenewseurope.com/en/3d-human-sensing-with-wi-fi/

>>513289257
>>513289624
who cares about lead paint DO YOU KNOW HOW MUCH LEAD IS IN THE UNIVERSE RIGHT NOW? Like a trillion billion tons lol and they're scared shitless of a tiny microscopic sprinkle going in their body

>>513290215
A laser is highly concentrated light though, and even then the damage is caused by the heat generated which is all that typically happens when you're subjected to non-ionizing radiation. It just converts into heat.

>>513289894
Answer mine. The crux of the issue is the amount of time we're exposed to it ie all of it. All of our time we're exposed to it. What's more likely to cause lung cancer, a person who survived a house fire with smoke inhalation or someone who smokes 1 cigarette a day for 50 years? The world should show you that small effects can build up into giant things when given long enough time. Just look at the grand canyon.

>>513275952
Women?

>>513290565
The house fire guy because many things in your house produce smoke that is way more toxic than a cigarette

>>513290547
>which is all that typically happens when you're subjected to non-ionizing radiation every moment of your life for 80 years
You left out that last part, disingenuous prick.

>>513289918
Ohms law isnt useful when there is an observable voltage?? If you are consulting AI for this convo its lost the plot.

>>513290674
You are subjected to non-ionizing radiation every second of your life and so were people 200 years ago

>>513290652
You're full of shit, dude. Anything to suck globohomo dick. An unsurprisingly common attitude amongst your ilk.

>>513290732
Not as much, dipshit.

>>513290695
You're getting into electrochemistry, it's clearly outside your scope of knowledge.

>>513290547
So like a microwave?

Can humans be harmed by microwave radiation?

>>513290912
No offense, but I dont trust your opinion on any of the sciences if ohms law trips you up.

>>513290851
>>513290884
Calm down gramps

>>513290884
Okay but define how much more, because when you're talking about adding ~100nW of additional radiation onto background radiation it's equivalent to a drop of piss in an ocean of piss.

Physics is a kike pseudoscience, DON'T STUDY IT!

>>513275952
chernobyl ?

>>513290596
Based underated knower

>>513291066
You keep talking about Ohms law, explain it's importance with regards to ion transport processes across a cell wall please.

>>513282832
Good thing I always wear something like picrel and have them half way on to look like an old school dj for the lulz. Plus they sound better and don't feel so invasive

>>513291475
Picrel

>>513289868
>How long does an x-ray last vs how long you're getting blasted with wifi?
1 xray can cause a murderous cancer bitflip in you vs wifi cannot bump electrons
wifi damages you cause it is changing quantum entanglements around you. there are so many particles raining down at you from every direction. it's doubtful that radio can do anything to you biologically, only in butterfly effect. the sun is hitting you with ionizing radiation all the time. I would be more concerned about the materials and fallout of the things you hang around.

>>513291299
Ohms law is just a formula consisting of voltage current and resistance and how they relate within a circuit.

I asked you if you knew how it worked (it would have been easier if you just said no so i could explain if that were the case)

Anyway, since we have a voltage, we are still missing some data in order to calculate current.

Once we know the current, we can find the strength of the signal with another equation.

Now, what are these missing pieces to calculate the current, do you know? I ask for a reason.

>>513291629
You need to use equations for electrochemical potential for this.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electrochemical_potential

>>513291109
You define it over the course of a person's entire life. It adds up.
>>513291535
You globohomo cock suckers are so focused on ionization you assume that's the only way radiation could ever damage you. You all have the same fucking line. It exists already so have more. How about since lead exists everywhere, I insert some into your brainpan at 1,500 feet per second? How does that sound?

>>513291912
Please explain why

>>513284517
>how do antibiotics work?
>imagine there are little soldiers inside of you that -
What he's wanting instead of the weird analogy is "they kill bacteria".
Analogies are sometimes fine but not always.

>>513275866 (OP)
Buy a mine. But beware, it gets real quiet down there, too quiet. Can you keep yourself good company for a while?

>>513292010
>Please explain why
Because it's not a signal involving electrons passing through a conductor, it's a signal based on the mixing and separation of ions in an aqueous medium across a boundary. Suppose you mixed a beaker of ferric sulfate in water and ferrous sulfate in water and someone starts asking you about what the ohms involved would be... like what are you talking about friend.

>>513289799
And X-ray techs will wear protective gear to shield them from the excessive X-ray energy they're exposed to constantly. And will make you wear gear also on areas that you're not getting x-rayed.
Not sure that's the argument you want.

Im a rf engineer, I spend time in anechoic chamber (shield for outside + absorb inside emissions). I feel no differences, except that my ear feel funny. People never calculate the power of wifi or whatever. Its extremely small and decay fast with distance

>>513284418
Is that why hippies are so stinky they think the hot in hot water heaters is like a nuclear reactor or something?

>>513292368
Anytime there is an observable voltage, there is electrical activity regardless of where and what it is, and all the same rules apply regarding.. You seem to be oblivious to the fact that the brain is full of electrical impulses, something i thought was common knowledge.

Have you ever heard of an eeg?

>>513290518
Kek! Based leafy bants.

Phew i need a break

>>513275866 (OP)
do you understand the technology and electricity??? how much watts is every device emmiting in every direction and how much per square cm is reaching you (it disipates exponentially?? idk, i have this note about it "x4 output power = + 100% range")

do you ever touched electricity from a cable??? you can touch 220v for a sec and be alright, just a strong zap

>>513278092
The vast majority of people lived in cucksheds without plumbing or electricity or even windows.

It really isn’t that hard to live like a medieval peasant, you just don’t want to. You want to live like a medieval lord with extra bonuses. Obviously that is hard to obtain.

>>513291513
>>513291475
>Nonremovable wire
>Multiple wires
Big yikes

>>513291963
All the other natural radiation also lasts your entire life so that's a pretty flimsy argument. I'm not taking either of you guyses side cause I just don't know either way and don't really care I just hope I don't have to suffer so much before finally getting to be with Jesus.

>>513292132
That depends if I can have an alien boyfriend and raise his child that he gives birth to in the mind (no homo)

>>513293056
Don't listen to this fucking retard

Depending on the amperage of 220 you will absolutely get shocked and possibly have your muscles clinch up and not be able to release your grip and then you will fry

>strongest wifi signal is a jeet's
Unfortunately you can't escape them with their current numbers. Even African shitholes are complaining about the jeet blight.

>>513292896
>49 posts by this id
Yep time to find another thread to ruin mission accomplished

>>513276550
Solar radiation is black body chaos. The only discontinuities are some Rayman absorption lines and some broad atmospheric filtering.
It is as far from digital signals as you can get.

>>513282451
>Once you go blind its usually over.

>>513275866 (OP)
There's whitey running away from economic responsibility again.

>>513293952
They love their wifi and bluetooth dont they.

>>513292654
>hippy bad
Low iq take

>>513299949
You have no idea how horrible they truly are. The greediest most selfish drug addicted psychos in the world who grew into the Yuppy boomers who are still destroying the country as I type this.

>>513276740
Next time explain things like an adult instead of a 5 year old.
The sun is many thiusands of times more powerful than a 5g array AT THE SURFACE OF THE EARTH

>>513275866 (OP)
Just think of it like lightbulbs scattered around you

if you aren't scared shitless by your electrified house and all the light emitting diodes that spew radiation everywhere, then dont be scared of your wifi either

>>513300626
The boomers who have a bad rap are the ones who exterminated the hippies with their greed

If the hippies prevaled we wouldnt be fucking poisoned by everything and rentoid slaves unable to afford anything and everything would be organic and free

>but thats not possible!

Says the boomer

>>513300985
Youre kinda proving his point, but you might be too dumb to realize it ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

>>513275866 (OP)
The Sun produces radio waves too. Might as well move underground.

>>513275952
Wow, the air of authority paired with the hint of mystery of this post is so intriguing that I’m not even irked that he didn’t even leave a clue as to what he’s talking about, I’m just going to open up my internet browser, start with the first website registered alphabetically, and grind my way through the entire thing until the truth just leaps out at me, like it has clearly done for this insightful poster.

Thank you sir.

>>513275866 (OP)
humans suck at assessing risk
you're worried about wifi signals while guzzling down alcohol, processed food and added sugars

it's making people faster, speeding up the circadian rhythm so they turn into hyper-vigilant snitches ruining Timmies high life

>>513303301
Sounds based keep us posted

>>513275866 (OP)
How'd you generate this chart? I need to see mine visualized like that. My computer is picking up 27 routers at this second, not including Bluetooth device emissions. Last week I wrapped my router with 3 loose layers if faraday fabric and there's almost 0 impact on performance except in the known near dead spots in the house, which are now just dead spots. At a minimum, it's way over powered if it's still able to emit through 3 layers of mesh

>>513289938
I told my family 5 years ago that Chuck McGill was way, way ahead of his time and they still think I'm crazy

>>513306601
>At a minimum, it's way over powered if it's still able to emit through 3 layers of mesh

Of course it is, because its a signal strength arms race amongst the retards, if your neighors get stronger router and causes interference, you have to keep up with the jones.

This will eventually be "solved" with an even worse idea even more dentrimental to our health I am sure.

>>513276032
If it can impact complex organisms like bees and butterflies then it can absolutely disrupt single cell systems like what you have in your gut. There is a whole lot of distance between "does nothing at all to the body" and "causes cancer", which is the only one that's been studied

>>513285869
Different frequencies. It's like asking why different frequencies don't drown each other out.

>>513292368
The utter confidence you had being wrong for like 30 posts is amazing

>>513275866 (OP)
What about radio? You can be in Antarctica or the middle of the pacific ocean and still be able to pick up BBC Radio National and foreign militaries beeping at each other over shortwave.

>>513275866 (OP)
If it really were dangerous, why would the ruling class be exposing themselves to it as well?
There probably is Wifi in Davos, or the Vatican, or the City of London.

>>513309426
More cancer brought on by capitalism IMO.

Tesla was a redditor btw, hes the reason why we have deadly high voltage everywhere because it was cheaper and easier to spread the cancer that way than with low voltage. Hes the reason why bulbs flicker because of his ridiculous and schizo AC current. He did everything for the upvotes not caring how it impacted society.

>>513310192
The "ruling class" isnt smart, otherwise they wouldnt glorify their dying flesh as they are obsessed with doing.

Even the pharoah's buried themselves with all their shit hoping they could keep it. Morons.

>>513275866 (OP)
>Is it really safe and effective to just live in this shit 24/7
If you haven't noticed, the average normie (and even the formerly intelligent /pol/ posters) has become a mouthbreathing retard.

Getting bombarded with health-destroying radio waves 24/7 365 is part of that. The other part is the injecting of graphene-laden self-assembling nanobots into human beings with Covid-19 "vaccines"

>>513276032
The right frequency can do all of the things "you" (an AI) claims.

It can be used to harm, maim, control your mind, and even kill you. With ease, by the by.

>>513275866 (OP)
Nothing wrong in moving deep into the woods. Think about that.

>>513312671
Yea? Any suggestions where to?

>>513275866 (OP)
Why do you think 2.4ghz is THE standard for wireless? They use it to give lab rats diabetes so they can test drugs to sell you for the diabetes you have from your wireless devices.

>>513282832
doesnt even matter. i just think of something and its on my social media seconds later

>>513314013

>>513275866 (OP)
Way back in my GATE times, I had a teacher named Gajjar. She had a heavy accent and would always screech at us to
>stop pounding on the keyboard!
Constantly. She’s probably dead now. RIP Ms. Gajjar.

>>513285199
It also doesn't necessarily have to be obviously "harmful" in a "high-energy" manner to be a problem. It doesn't need to be on the "chemical" scale to cause problems, even on the "physical" level of being bombarded with constant "noise" could have a chronic effect.

>>513316548
Correct. Blinking visible lights are enough to trigger epilepsy in some people. Not a stretch to think that blinking invisible lights dont affect us somehow as well.