>>513312559 (OP)No because
1) This is not happening to any of the shitskin countries. In fact the arab nations specifically disallow this from happening by tethering them to a perpetual slave status and just purging them from the country whenever they're done picking the cotton. It's only the white countries that are letting them loiter for generations.
2) The added value is subtracted by the lack of proportional productivity, while at the same time costing as much welfare as a productive native. In fact even more. The companies and financial institutions have to pay higher and higher taxes to sustain this.
3) The risk of a popular rebellion and a race war can easily be quantified and you can very easily conclude that investing long-term in a place like France and Germany is probably not the best idea, so this means that these companies' assets are all a single black swan away from a total bankruptcy, which only adds to the cost of every immigrant brought in.
4) The employment rate of the natives (pic rel) goes down, which also adds to the likeliness of militant dissent, and these unemployed whites are the exact opposite of what your pic is trying to paint as a financial utopia, as they no longer have the ability to borrow.
5) AI is going to automate all of it anyway and you'll be left bagholding millions of unemployed shitskins demanding to be fed through gibs.
When you consider all of these points, you will realize that it is impossible to derive any sort of a profit out of this. There is no profit motive in the flood of our societies. Marxist analysis fails totally in this case, because there is an ideological motive.