>>513490508 (OP)
Where Democrats focus on trannies and illegals, Republicans are the party of the middle class

>>513490508 (OP)
paying workers is bad for the stock market

>>513491065
Turns out that if you don't pay workers they can't buy any of your shit and you have no business.

>>513490508 (OP)
Boeing sees no issues in making partnerships with state owned Chinese firms.
Who is directly supporting communism here?

>>513491238
China is state capitalist.

>>513491368
Then I am sure in your eyes the senator is too.

>>513490508 (OP)
Republicans have always been progressives and of the political Left. What people consider "right wing" or "conservative" in the US is just the right side of the left wing uniparty.

>>513491966
Huh?

>>513490508 (OP)
thats fucking based as hell
more please

>>513491368
Anything larger than a fruit stall in China must have a Party member as a director. It's a planned socialist economy from the ground up.

>>513490508 (OP)
Free market is when three MIC corporations control the entire aviation and weapons industries while also writing the laws.

>>513492159
it really was wasn't it

how is anything this guy said sounding like a communist? he's a public representative using a public forum to chastise a greedy pig for being a scumfuck nigger.

>>513492045
You initially proposed him as a communist ideologue, yet your definition for China is capitalist.
Both positions equalize each other given the context of intervention in the free market.

>>513491368
China is actually national socialist

>>513492348
The CEO is also an employee and in a position that demands more skills than the unskilled workers he's talking about.

>>513492487
i'll let my captcha describe you, faggot

>>513490508 (OP)
Idk but it's pretty based desu

>>513490508 (OP)
National Socialism

>>513492609
>Nooo!! You have to pay guys who work the bare minimum with a single skill the same as the guy who has to handle multiple departments!!!

>>513492789
>i'm a retard
retard

>>513492409
China doesn't even have minimum wages and neither does it demand that CEOs should be paid less.

>>513490508 (OP)
More like a nationalist and more like a socialist. Like some kind of national socialist.

>>513490508 (OP)
>why republicans are talking like communists
They needed to adapt to the very growing communist cultural subversion program

>>513492409
China doesn't even have minimum wage and neither does it demand that CEOs should be paid less.

>>513492348
That's right burger.

A commie would have said: this burgeouis pig should be put to death so the workers can seize the means of production.

This is actually quite reasonable criticism. Like: hey pig why the 45% increase - do you really need it? Inflation is 10% the guys actually making the plane get bleeding assholes from how hard we fucked them by printing money here in good old Washington DC. Pass it on them, will ya Prince greedy fuck?
The only reason your garbage company still runs is because money printing Uncle Sam is your #1client. Get to it you fat fuck. K thanks bye.

>>513490508 (OP)
>32°8 million/yr
And Boeing still sucks.

>>513492487
Boeing relies on government contracts.
Boeing's performance is dogshit, otherwise the CEO wouldn't be sitting there getting scolded by a Senator half his age and taking it like a fat little toddler who got caught with his hand in the cookie jar.

>>513490913
With all that jump in prices because of tariffs? Why are you still here?

>>513493056
Except the CEO doesn't get to decide how much gets "passed on"

>>513490508 (OP)
Too bad he also voted to give them billions in tax cuts and subsidies that they will then use to buy back their own stock and give their CEO another 20 million bonus.

>>513491238
Had been bashing Boeing since 2000s. There was bad incidents with Boeing back then and both parties still defends Boeing to this day.

>>513493033
>China doesn't even have minimum wage and neither does it demand that CEOs should be paid less
But if they act in their own interests they disappear. Seen Jack Ma lately?

>>513492949
So China is actually more capitalist than America, a very unique position.
>>513492789
Boards match the pay to the presumed rise in share price not the CEOs workload.

>>513490508 (OP)
You don't see a problem with that guy paying himself 32 million while that company is being ran into the ground? The govt can't let them fail as they're a defense contractor so... Yea. Some of the funniest shit on the internet was when Trey Gowdy(?) and Jeff Chaffetz would publicly humuliate bureaucrats for being fuckups. Both republicans. "UHHHHH sir do you want to tell us how the fuck you spent 2 million dollars on a bicycle?"

>>513493376
That's when they go against the party, not when they get more salaries than workers.
>>513493391
The rise in share price is also the result of the CEO managing the company.
>>513493521
See >>513493192

>>513490508 (OP)
For the last time, being pro-labor isn't communist. The only difference between a labor union and a company that deals in labor is semantics.

>>513490508 (OP)
good, fuck greedy CEOs

>>513493822
The CEO is also part of the labor force.

>>513493295
The government normally kisses Boeing's ass. Their majority shareholders are Blackrock and Vanguard, the management policies he's getting scolded for are likely DEI shit coming from Blackrock.
They had large 3 insiders (CEOs) resign in 2024 ahead of the election. (2 in March, 1 in September)
Something is going on with Boeing.
Is it theater? Probably, but it doesn't look like the CEO was in on it.

>>513493695
Your original argument was about skilled vs unskilled labour.
It doesn’t take “skill” to make promises to board members in order to get an incentive pay package before even delivering anything.

>>513494653
The 45% increase in question is based on performance of the shares.

>>513492412
China is a fascist oligarchy that LARPs as national socialist. In fact, nearly every state across the globe is a fascist oligarchy as evidenced by the coordinated lockdown of the world in the midst of the Covid Plandemic.

>>513494773
That is an abstract number which takes in emotional value judgements of the past the future.

>>513495100
No, the board decides on the salary increase based on objective data and economic forecasts.

>>513495208
Hahaha

>>513495285
That is how companies are run. If you base things on vibes and emotions, the company goes under.