>>513492761>It portraits defending your civilizationis it really ""your"" civilization if the wealth that has been accumulated by your ancestors through sacrifice and passed down to you is currenly being transferred to ethnical outsiders, at your own expense, and you are blamed as "racist" if you want them to go back home?
is it really ""your"" civilization if there's no sense of belonging or community or camaraderie among your peers and elders that guide you?
is it really ""your"" civilization if media wants you to hate the epic feats of your ancestors and to forget your history because it's problematic?
why would you defend such a civlization in first place, and defend from who?
>having a career as something undesirable.having a dead-end 9-5 is undesirable, definitely
>Would you then agree that onlyfans women work real jobs?Yes, if we draw the parallel that video game stremers are also "content creators" so in that case, even if it's a stretch, you can call it a job.
Anyway my definition or understand and whether I agree with onlyfans or not is irrelevant, what counts is whether your government considers it a job a or not, or whether it's illegal.
>Unless they inherited a fortune or won big on crypto,Or they live together and split the bills, lot of guesswork can be done here
>So something that is rewarding that only benefits yourself?Video game streaming benefits others by providing fun and experience, you also pay your taxes on the revenue from the platform that fund bridges, roads, power grids.....
We are talking semantics here.
You can contribute to astrophysics research if you want, or to FOSS software. You can do whatever you want.
>>513493142Where's the doomercult supposed to be? Those frogs are pretty happy.