One that you strongly believe in?

>>513517505 (OP)
THE BEST DEFENSE IS OFFENSE

>>513517505 (OP)
That Welfare is wrong because by taking resources from the productive members of society to feed genetic failures tampers with the natural selection of the fittest, actually inverting it. This creates a scenario where the unfittest reproduce due to the abundance of resources and lack of future planning abilities while the productive members of society, deprived by the state of resources to produce offspring become scarcer in number and less motivated to contribute. this devolves the human race and thus is wrong for the species, and it shows.

>>513517505 (OP)
All humans should be killed

>>513517505 (OP)
Nationalism and globalism are both wrong, and for the same reasons.

>>513518305
How do you defend this?

>>513518305
No you don't.

>>513517605
The cult of the offensive has been antiquated since before ww2.

The best offense is a strong defense.

>>513517605
Actually, that's an easy one.

>>513518248
We no longer live in a society where doing well means you are the strong, we are perpetuating the weak and often failing the strong before they even had a chance.

>>513517505 (OP)
Women being dei’ed into power

>>513517505 (OP)
cool pic, saved, thanks

>>513517505 (OP)
Self defense and the ability to protect yourself and your family is a holy right. Once someone willingly attacks you, they lose all rights and can be taken down like a rabid animal. If you have video proof or eye witnesses you cannot be charged. If someone breaks into your home it doesn't matter if you shoot him, stab him 70 times with a pair of scissors or beat him up to death with your bare hands. Once authorities show up, they can only clean up the corpse and wish you a good day.

>>513518560
Np

>>513517505 (OP)
>What is a very hard political take to defend?

The number of children a family can have should be based on eugenic principles to produce a smarter, healthier, and more athletic populace.

It would work, the genes of the society would start improving; but if you say it everyone concludes you're a genocidal nazi and rejects the idea out of hand.

>>513518578
That's hard to defend?

>>513518578
Like 90% soon to be 99% of people now grow up in households where someone banging their parents in hopes to steal their inheritance are in the same house as them. How does your theory apply to ‘blended’ environments

we must escape the grid, it is weaponizable. everybody who stays in the city will be destroyed

in other words, there is no saving civilization in its current form, no reform or revolution will work this time, it is ww3. civilization must be abandoned, and started over again elsewhere

>>513518680
The idea that if someone starts so much as a fight with you, you can stab them 100 times with rusty scissors no matter what, sounds pretty unhinged serial killer shit and hard to defend to sane people. Now standing your ground even to the point of the other persons death, is easy to defend.

>>513518611

the problem is largely self-correcting in time, and the problem with your approach is that it relies on human discernment/discrimination, which is incomplete. again, nature reflexively knows best and will sort things out.

>>513518680
Leftist niggers that think all life is sacred, criminal scum included. Also retarded self defense laws in my post communist shithole of a country.

>>513517505 (OP)
Some of you may of heard of the nigger tax. It's a hidden tax we all pay everyday for pretending niggers are our equals. Just a way of looking at what could have been in terms of opportunity cost, an opportunity debt, if you will. I was thinking about it, and I think the foid tax FAR... FAR exceeds the nigger tax. Segregation was ended at bayonette point, and society largely moved on. Things were shittier, forever... but 4 waves of feminism literally ended society.

>>513517505 (OP)
Democrats are a better political party than the republican/GOP.

>>513517505 (OP)
The slavery white people practiced was good and healthy for society. Only the slavery the jews undertook was bad.

Whites/aryans, in the Greek tradition, used slavery as a means to erase debt. Slavery was never permanent, it was always a temporary status someone either inflicted on themselves to resolve a debt, or in the case of criminality, a status society legally inflicted on someone with the intent of erasing a significant criminal debt. It has ancient roots going back to the concepts of blood price, and the Old Testament notion that a man owned the people as well as the things of his household, and could thus demand a price be paid if they were injured or harmed. It was a form of justice. It also has ties to other traditional practices such as Christian Jubilee, and the centennial forgiveness of all debt. This forgiveness was always framed as being divine in origin, as coming from God, or some intermediary for God like the king or the church.

As long as white slave practices, jubilee, and blood prices/wergeld existed, the jews would never be able to operate their usury schemes or realize their ambitions for an international banking cabal. If someone was buried in debt, they could enslave themselves to work it off. If the debt was so extreme it could not be worked off, it would be erased in five or ten years by Jubilee, or some wealthy altruist of the community could buy the debt and release someone from it.

Many argue that putting a price on human life is barbaric, but in reality, the situation we live under now is far more barbaric than it ever was before. Today, you are owned by the state instead of your parents, your property is owned by the bank instead of your family. And jewish lives are judged to have infinite value (forever reparations for the Holocaust) while yours are judged to have none.

None of this would be possible if those old systems still existed. People were better off as property.

>strongly believe
I can help.

>>513518771
and just where the fuck is elsewhere?

>>513519171
Narnia

>>513519110
i think the term slavery was changed to indenture servitude because of this reason and the version of slavery you could be born into made into the current def.

>>513517505 (OP)
That freedom of speech is a positive thing. I don't see the benefit of permitting society-destroying ideas to flourish and poison the minds of impressionable young children. The faggot/troon-epidemic is a case-and-point.

>>513518248
I have never really met anyone who is outright against all social welfare institutions, The common argument is that how they are abused and structured in a way that rewards recipients for becoming even more dependent on it.

>>513517505 (OP)
my confidence in any given belief is directly proportional to how well that belief withstands scrutiny

>>513518611
>>513518821

We're not in the state of nature though.

Evolution isn't picking the most fit. Its picking the lousy men women are picking. More than that people with an average IQ of 70 are having 10 kids a piece and we continually stave off starvation and disease from culling their numbers as their population explodes.

If we don't have natural selection then we need artificial selection.

>>513519171

the wilderness


9 'Whoever stays in this city will die by the sword, famine, or plague.'
Jeremiah 21

5 This is what the Lord, the God of Israel, says: "Like these good figs, I regard as good the exiles from Judah, whom I sent away from this place"
Jeremiah 24

2 This is what the Lord says: "The people who survive the sword will find favor in the wilderness
Jeremiah 31

>>513519494

we're always in the state of nature. imbalances are inevitably corrected.

women picking is only half the equation. it's the only half we've ever known in practice, and to most of you that means it's the only half you can conceive of. but it's not.

>The sexual struggle is of two kinds; in the one it is between the individuals of the same sex, generally the male sex, in order to drive away or kill their rivals, the females remaining passive; whilst in the other, the struggle is likewise between the individuals of the same sex, in order to excite or charm those of the opposite sex, generally the females, which no longer remain passive, but select the more agreeable partners. -Charles Darwin
https://sourcebooks.fordham.edu/mod/1871darwin-desc3.asp

>>513519216
>i think the term slavery was changed to indenture servitude because of this reason and the version of slavery you could be born into made into the current def.
Yes, but that form of slavery is alien to white civilization, which is my entire point. Caste-based slavery was Indian and African in origin, it was practiced by niggers and jeets, it was adopted by (semi) modern jews. It has no roots or history in white civilization, it isn't a part of Greek or Christian society. We had slavery, but it was completely different, and a good and healthy mechanism for society.

Not only was white slavery good, but we never practiced caste slavery. Arabs are the greatest slavers of history, with niggers being a close second. Jews of more recent times purchased their slaves from the nigger slave trade in Africa, then sold those nigger slaves to OTHER jews that lived in colonial-era America. The overwhelming majority of all slave owners in America were ethnically jewish, and every slave ship that operated during the trans-atlantic slave trade was owned and crewed by jews. It was a completely jewish enterprise.

And yet somehow, through historical revisionism and the yiddish alchemy of public perception, white people bare the full brunt of the blame for historical slavery, when in actual fact we participated in it the lest, were the VICTIMS of it more often than not, and what little slavery we did practice was explicitly designed to fight a cancerous aspect of society that, today, is allowed to run totally unchecked: debt.

That's my point. Not all slavery was bad, and white people aren't to blame for slavery. Our societies would be far better off if they still operated with children and wives being treated as property, people had MORE rights and functional freedom under that system than they do now. Modern freedom is a lie, modern rights are a joke. I would rather be directly owned by my father who loves me than proxy owned by a government that actively hates me.

>>513519234
welfare is a factory of dependant voters for corrupt regimes that sacrifice the future of the country they rule to perpetuate themselves into power to become rich in the short term (their livespan) this creates an imperfect equilibrium, a scenario where a few generations may run on the fumes of the former better society. but those fumes are being consumed exponentially faster as time passes because the improductive sector of society grow exponentially while the sector that is being milked to pay for the welfare party dwindles even faster.

>>513518305
based

>>513519234
I think the troon thing, and things like it, are self-correcting over time, it is not worth giving up the benefits of free speech and expression.

>>513519234
People aren't against social welfare; they're against government run social welfare, because it's evil.