>>513520409archaic, as in, the polish of the internet we see now that is clean and crisp and accessible was simply not there. you needed to be smart(ish) and intuitive enough to navigate the rudimentary programs and have a clear purpose on the web. Thing of it like, NES games, and then SNES games, they all look pretty crappy and jank, but at the time, those were each significant improvements on each ideation before it. Same with the internet as it slowly became more accessable and thus, user friendly.
The breaking points as a few folks have said before, are the late 90's dot-com bubble, where thousands of folks would pitch ideas to potential clients/investors about different ways to have people access information or, how to sell/showcase ideas in the form of multimedia, and then as those ideas solidified, 2006 was around the time the iphone became the first real way for there to be the internet in your pocket. Before all of this, it was simply phonelines and and television and if you wanted to know something, you would just like, ask your friends/family if they had any knowledge about it.
It's really hard to see the pulleys and levels behind the scenes now because every single 'app' is designed for accessibility and definitely marketability in this hellscape of AI slop, tictoc, and conglomeration of globohomo taking over every corner of the net into like, 5~ total sites (google, facebook, apple, microsoft, etc) because all of the smaller run and niche creators and webmasters were replaced by far more efficient machines. It was a lot more care-free and had limited-quality media devoted to being cool, odd, quirky, expressive, all-around niche for those waiting to uncover it. A lot of that still exists today, with youtube and this site, but it's just blanketed by parroting rebbit faggotry and a LOT of dullards who have no business being on the net to begin with.