Editors at USA Today felt that it was OK to publish this as a banner headline -- on a story about spiders. I was sorta perturbed about it. I'm thinking about contacting the editors at USA Today. Give me some ideas about what I should say...

>Julia Gomez
Ask them if she's legal. Demand proof.

>Sorry I miss big beaner dick
>Oi oi OI OOOI OOOOIIIIIIIIII

>>513522667 (OP)
I hope a literal giant 50 foot tall ape stumbles across the pervert who wrote this, and puts her thesis to the test

>>513523335

Yeah, I mean, I'm sure the editors would throw a fit if it were a man reporting on stereotypes about women even if what he was reporting were inconvenient truths. What do they call em, double standards or something.

And I can't help but to note this woman's apparent interest in animal dicks. What is she doing in her free time?

>>513523079
(((Gomez)))

>>513523616
>sorry chicks, size does matter: meet the udderly delicious bovines behind 40% of americas mammalian biomass

>>513524111

kek

>>513522667 (OP)
Hi OP. Welcome to pol. This is called a "clickbait" headline. That you are so upset that you're posting about it here, threatening to write emails, shows you're low IQ. You may want to lurk (browse) this website. You will gain insight into how the media works. Insight won't help raise your IQ, but you'll find you'll be less agitated going about your day.

>>513525331

Hello anon. I am well aware that is a "clickbait" headline as you say. As far as posting about it and writing emails to the editor, I think that is high IQ behavior. It demonstrates ACTION, not just talking, doing nothing. I have been browsing pol for some time. We need to hold publications to a standard. You may be interested in the letter I wrote to the editors. It follows....


To the Editors of USA Today,

I am writing to express my disappointment with the headline "Sorry Guys Size Does Matter" on your recent article about spider evolution.

While I understand the attempt at a playful double entendre, I found it to be a poor choice for a publication of your stature. The headline undermines the legitimate scientific content of the article, reducing a fascinating topic in evolutionary biology to a juvenile punchline.

This type of clickbait strategy might generate a momentary click, but it ultimately cheapens your brand and alienates readers who expect serious science journalism, even when presented in an accessible way. The actual findings about spider size are interesting enough to stand on their own without resorting to tired, objectifying tropes.

I hope you will consider adopting a more respectful and professional approach to headline writing in the future. The science you report on deserves to be taken seriously.

Thank you for your time and consideration.

Sincerely,

[Name Redacted]
A Concerned Reader

>>513526155
a gentleman and a scholar

>>513522667 (OP)
Seeing niggers get insecure over this makes me giggle so hard. Every woman I've ever been with has told me size matters. If you haven't heard it from one, you're not in the club and simply a "nice guy" for her to fall back onto after I gape her holes and fart in them

>>513522667 (OP)
>Size Does Matter
That's true. If you are below 15cm, your options are extremely limited.

>>513526867
>>513526878

Even if size does matter do we, even if this were an "inconvenient truth", do we as men have to be confronted by these standards placed on us even in matters where it isn't appropriate, a news article about spiders? Why is it regarded as being ok to do that with no consequence with dudes but not okay when talking about women? That's the issue I have with it.

>>513527227
tightness matters, babies are the most. grannies are the least

>>513527227
> do we as men have to be confronted by these standards placed on us even in matters where it isn't appropriate

Yes. You have to constantly be reminded that you are inferior to me because my pagan gods blessed me with a huge raping cock. Thats the rules

>>513523079
None of them are.

>>513527270

kek

Did you know a whales vagina can be as big as a human head to toe?

>>513527673

Didn't know that

>>513523079

umm post the fucking spider dick or fuck off

>>513527673
A whale's vagina is called a krod.

>>513526155
Based

>>513522667 (OP)
This bitch wants to fuck spiders

Early Life has nothing... curious.

>>513528091
that's a weird fucking way to spell san diego

>>513528391

Yeah i sent the writer, herself, an email. The email follows:


Ms. Gomez,

You have an apparent interest in animal penises, so much so that you compose and publish an article to be seen worldwide on the topic. Not my business what you choose to do behind closed bedroom doors but I sincerely hope it does not involve the use of pets.


Sincerely
A Concerned Reader

>>513528531

Who is that?

>>513528531

Oh you mean the writer. I bowsed the writers Instagram. She looks totally different from her thumbnail picture on the USA Today website.