>>513539809100-120 would be midwit. Midwit means just that, โmiddle witโ. They are the largest population, and most mass media and systemic processes are catered to and created by them on the cognitive backs of a larger population of smarter people. Theyโre the average, goyfeed TV watching, Netflix subscribing, Marvel watching, political party registering, sportsball enjoying person who works a routine job and whose concerns hardly extend outside of themselves, their own household, or friend group.
Once you start pushing over 110-115 you start getting the pseudo intellectuals, the political activists who are useful idiots, and the college graduates. These are the worst kinds of people because not only do they command the interests of the majority of the population, but theyโre comparatively smart enough for the idiot masses to think that theyโre a genius with a plan. Whatโs the most dangerous about them is that they really have no concept of abstract thinking past a few years or decades, so in every moment they think that theyโre geniuses with a solution to everything.
The sub-130 IQ but 120+ are typical politicians, pundits, or business leaders. Theyโre arenโt smart enough to moralize over their decisions, but they can command massive amounts of social power just by sheer virtue of being smart enough to affect change, but dumb enough to not comprehend the consequences. Theyโre completely unbound by the smart personโs ability to question their own judgement.
130+ would be gifted, but usually have immense social handicaps because they arenโt able to relate with the wider population. They have fringe interests and think about concept that are incomprehensible to the midwit. A large company will typically have a sub-130 IQ group of executives directing the work of a 130+ group.
140+ are at the level that theyโd barely even consider most of the population to be human, at least not the concept of a human that they have in their own mind.