I know we’ve all been saying how we want feminism to reach the basement and course correct, but I don’t think you guys can see around corners like I can. Rather than reduce themselves to mere fuck holes, women are going to seek the exact opposite, whereby they show no ass, no titties, no visible thongs, etc. We are on the precipice on a new Ice Age the likes we’ve never seen before. Prepare to see birth rates straight up disappear. Women are realizing they don’t need or want us OR our attention. It’s unironically over.

Most of them have been sterilized anyway.

>>513534582 (OP)
I thought Conservatives were in support of women dressing modestly? There's no pleasing you idiots

>birth rates were high in the 1800s because of women dressing slutty

This is bullshit

>>513534582 (OP)
Can zoomers do anything but copy the 90s style? At least us millennials invented sexcore

>>513534996
Thats not a zoomer

>>513535110
Millenials didnt creat anything its 100% nostalgia/irony posting. Millenials are responsible for everything just being remade into something more shitty. Millennials were kids in the 90s they didnt come up with the style. Kids dont invent culture

>>513534582 (OP)
zoomers are based they also see no-show socks as peak faggotry
total millennial death

>>513534582 (OP)
pussy gone Ice Age cold, colder than an Eskimo nun's pussy at the north Pole
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SdOFadTTV_8

>>513535460
Thats where they are wrong. Long socks while wearing shorts, socks with sandles is sloppy nigger shit and zoomers look stupid for it.

>>513534582 (OP)
>women are obeying god now
based

>>513534582 (OP)
>at the gym
leggings are still a perfectly reasonable thing to wear to exercise in. what we're talking about more specifically here is the so called "athleisure" style that spawned out of wearing what you wore to gym out and about. people dont shower and change after working out anymore, so from an exercise to being in public standpoint, all gym clothes need to fall under the same umbrella as pic rel.

>>513534734
We are.
OP is likely a jeet.

Women that dress like whores disqualify themselves from wife material. This increases the number of breedable women.

>>513535269
>zoomertranny has an opinion
into the trash

Oh my God, all the women who will never have sex with me will continue to not have sex with me!? Quick, toss "dark" in front feminism! I bet Obama did this!

>>513534582 (OP)
Women cant deal with social isolation like men can. They want to be seen, not just by men, but by other women. And when they see a lone dove in a dress getting more attention than they are in their frumpypants, they will seatglhe. Lmao. Women.

>>513535110
I've been noticing girls wearing these over size baggy pants and yeah it's just 90's all over. I still remember how they suddenly became cringe too.

>>513534582 (OP)
is that Frida Durst