Why is the true threat to society primarily niggers and illegals, but not the broken economic system that necessitates them and others to form a permanent underclass?

>>513575090 (OP)
Because that "broken" system is a continuation of all that has brought us wealth and anything good at all over the past centuries.

And also because the alternatives are even worse, like to a horrifying degree.
Like it's not even close; fascism, communism, theocracy, all so completely and utterly deranged and deformed that yes, the current system is better.

I am not opposed to trying new things, but rehashes of old failures are not new things at all.

Idk it depends. If you get shanked and killed by a nigger walking to buy a pack of smokes then nothing else really matters. If you avoid that then I think the greatest threat is technology. The underclass normcattle has always got by, I guarantee there are millions of people making pathetic wages that live happier and more fulfilling lives than Elon or Bezos. Now that you have 24/7 instant access to seeing Chad fucking models on his vacation it is harder to appreciate what you have, whether that is a loving wife and family or a comfy night staying in and playing vidya

>>513575266
What if we just taxed higher earners and large corporations at a higher rate and and used the revenue to guarantee a minimal standard of living instead of letting people fall out from society into the desperate poverty the encourages crime

>>513575598
problem is with a "minimum standard of living" lets say you gave everyone 2k a month, suddenly it costs 2.5k a month to live. You would have to freeze entire markets to make it happen.

>>513575598
Define value independently of valuta and perhaps we can come to an agreement, otherwise it's just going to keep ending up as the thieves' argument, as >>513575717 alludes to.

>>513575717
You assume that I am advocating for subsidizing demand, which is not so much the case for any modern welfare state. While, say, a government voucher for subsidized rent ala rent-control will undoubtably effect surrounding markets, government provided housing functionally does not draw from the same pool of demand as the private market. Public schooling functions similarly.
>>513575861 Certainly a dutchman who has hardly heard of bankruptcy from medical debt in his own country, as we have here in the United States (where they make up 66% of total personal bankruptcies), could understand the benefit of government regulated service over forcing everything to a profit-first industrial complex (which most people whose workplace doesn't provide an option can't even access).

>>513575090 (OP)
Now factor in being born into a good family and the gap becomes astronomical.