i've got into kind of a political rabbithole today and i was wondering if a democratic type of strasserism would work, i mean by replacing the strong authoritarian value and the furer with a more democratic leaning type of government, what do y'all think? i've discovered the existence of strasserism today so i might not have all the answers for your questions/statements guys mb

>>513647464 (OP)
Ah, the beefsteaks.
Too red.

>>513648571
but wouldn't communism go against racism therefore nationalism and especially white/aryan supremacy? that wouldn't work for a nazism based ideology

>>513647464 (OP)
>fascism is the way

>>513649000
Marx was racist as all fuck mate see; his letters to Engels, and the things he says about that mulatto chap, Ferdinand Lassalle.
The whole "multiculturalist anti-racist" thing was permutative on marx's ideas.

But also "Racism" in that sense is the idea of belonging to or having a "racial identity" at all.

That is the great project; to deracinate the people, as part of the process to building the "new Soviet man".
A man who's culture "was" Socialism.

It failed.
We are now living through another iterational failure of this abortive, anti-natural idea, but this time the "proletariat" role is played by -the entire third world-.

Post-war Marxists of the frankfurt school basically concluded that the working class had "betrayed" socialism itself, and were to be replaced with the "global proletariat" that consisted of the populations of the underdeveloped world.

And so, a new era of colonialism began; Marxist socialism in Africa has killed almost as many people as malaria.

>>513650678
alright i guess i get what u mean, but i cannot think of how one nation (or more idk) could be happy giving all the decisions for their lives and future in the hands of just one person, that in that case would be the Fuhrer, imo democracy would suit everyone's needs better since they go by with got most votes among all the voters and not the choice of only one individual

>>513649000
Reject mentions of race in the court of the optics king.
We are all [Class] and [Labor].

Unions (left) control most large labor pools, the only way to get around it is long marches through various industries, let them have their universities and eat them too.

A complete labor monopoly on a [Trade] in a local area allows you to finance and support other like-minded people and then take over sectors, then when the Jannie needs his toilet fixed because shit is spewing everywhere, the only people who are willing to do it in 300km all hate Jannies and won't, causing the Jannie fuck to have to pay some normie to drive 600km and do it for him.
It's called based labor actions, kind of like labor strikes but without the explosives.
>Seriously 1800-1918 labor strikes were fucking intense and there's a reason they don't teach you about them.
You can bleed people or make them suffer by directly targeting their labor supply by poaching guys and offering them a few dollars more and a better deal, take the right people at the right time and you can collapse a company or make them look stupid and thusly limit further growth.
Just imagine a videogame where you couldn't use violence, but you could use [Labor] to smash people in the face with, and starve them, that's all business, restricting the labor supply and profiting off handing out work and taking a cut, then pretending buying a new paintbrush would cause Africa tier famines.

Also watch gangs of new York, it's a movie about getting class and labor together for your own means.
>Achieving power.

yes, socially right wing with left wing economics is a great value, governments should fear its own citizens and only provide for them

>>513647464 (OP)
>more democratic leaning type of government
a group of vanguard intellectuals is needed to set the cultural egemony, from there organizing political structures is very easy

>>513651568
so if the citizens would all reunite and "elect" the most suited workers to kind of guide the nation that'll still be considered some kinda democracy am i right?

>>513647464 (OP)
I've been drinking discounted beer in my underwear for the last couple weeks and I think I've reconciled NatSoc with constitutional libertarian ideals. Runs on a jewish kibbutz system on the local level without all the commie bullshit so it's entirely voluntary and people should segregate themselves. Ultimate states rights where everyone is encouraged to be heavily armed. On the federal level I'm leaning towards some type of patriarchal quasi theological fascist triumvirate. Bronze age agrarian Uncle Ted society melded with futuristic space faring industrialization and positive eugenics. Horses and carrier pigeons next to maglev trains and automation. It's all seems a bit retarded I still need to hammer out a few minor details