>singlehandedly debunks all theories claiming that blacks can't build a functioning state
/pol/xissies, our response?

>>513685351 (OP)
Use Namibia next time as an example

>>513685351 (OP)
>>513685384
Both ran by Whites behind the scenes

>>513685351 (OP)
prove it's a functioning state first before you ask me to disprove it and stop with the low effort shit posting.
GAwd I wish you assholes would be banned for three weeks and not three days. read the fucking rules.

>>513685351 (OP)

>>513685384
Well Namibia was part of SA for a while so it wasn't really founded by blacks. I guess Gabon could also be a good example.

>>513685427
Nuh uh, we made it ourselves
>>513685439
Well it's the longest standing democracy on the continent, has a gdp per capita on par with many mid-level countries, relatively low crime, and a bustling tourist industry. Even the infrastructure is modern!

>>513685605
/thread

>>513685351 (OP)
South Africa and Namibia are relatively nice countries, so ofc they would be as well

>>513685605
>>513685881
What's the religion gotta do with race tho? There's plenty other Christian countries in Subsaharan Africa.
>>513685894
Yea but everybody always says that those countries were only nice because they were built by whites, and as soon as apartheid ended they got worse. Botswana and Gabon however were always run by blacks so that excuse cannot be made for them!

>>513685991
(You) are the one who claimed this was the one example of an African country that was untouched by (((whites))) and successful on its own. Either the other examlpes of Christians African countries are doing poorly because kike subversion blamed on whites, or Christianization is enough of a foreign influence for you to handwave away saying this country was successful on its own merit.

>>513685633
>50% of gdp from oil
>coup 2 years ago
>"good example"
lmao

>>513686267
Well if religion and colonization at one point are your bar then no black-controlled African countries exist in the modern day, I don't think religion makes as big of an impact on development as you think it is. Most of what Botswana has was made by them, not by Europeans simply because the Africans practice a semitic religion adopted by Europeans.
>>513686742
What's it matter where the money comes from? Nobody denies that the gulf countries are successful and they're entirely propped up by oil. That's not even mentioning how a big chunk of Russia and Canada's economies are also led by natural resources. The coup was also not the best, but political stability and QoL are two different things in this example.

>>513685824
Only 13% of Namibia's small-medium enterprises are black majority, 75% of Namibia's mining sector and 70% of it's farmland is White South African owned. Namibia's entire economy is ran by White Afrikaners, without them it'd be a dumpster.

>>513687410
I was talking about Botswana, not Namibia. Botswana only has a mere 3% white population, and all mining companies are jointly owned by the government and multinational corporations.

>>513687249
The purity bar was set by you, I merely pointed it out.
On religion not playing a big role, you severely underestimate religion.