What is the most right-wing belief you have? The one that's so far right it would get you removed from the family Thanksgiving dinner or suspended from school if you uttered it.

This thread is a safe place for Frens. Let it out.

>>513685648 (OP)
Im pro abortion (not pro choice) bcuz the White:black ratio is heavily in our favor.

>>513685648 (OP)
I don't even consider myself right wing anymore, I'm at the point where political positions, ideas, and morals are just changes of clothes. Out of the few things I truely give any fucks about, keeping the european bloodlines going and thriving is one of them

>>513686075
I have two criteria for whether or not I support abortion:
1) the race of the mother
2) the race of the father

>>513685648 (OP)
All that is solid melts into air, all that is holy is profaned, and man is at last compelled to face with sober senses his real conditions of life, and his relations with his kind.

>>513685648 (OP)
I have three kids and I low key want them to be white supremacists. Not like the militia gun club kind, but the have 10 kids and build our own Zion in the mountains kind.

>>513685648 (OP)
I think everyone should be required to experience hardships and abuse. In a sanctioned manner of course. With guided training and resources on how to deal with internal turmoil and conflict resolution
Perhaps not a “right wing” take

>>513686719
>All that is solid melts into air
Even steel beams?

>>513685648 (OP)
I'm past that 'haha racism is funny' phase. Or that 'racism is edgy' phase. I am in full on 1950s 'what is that nigger doing in this store' mode. 5% of blacks are ok. Maybe less.

>>513686075
yes abortion was working in our favor big time. whites are not getting abortion en mass like niggers.

>>513687083
I can appreciate this. I look at black kids playing in my neighborhood now and hope they get hit by a car.

>>513687083
But also Im not a closet racist. I front on niggers in public. And not in a 'it was real in my mind' kind of way. I make them feel uncomfortable intentionally. Why? Because i know they do that same shit to white people recreationally. I also know niggers are bitch made and their hearts pump kool-aid.

>>513687140
theyll probably get killed by another black. start the timer.

Introducing women to the workforce was a ploy by kikes to essentially double the working population without changing total jobs, thus increasing competitive and lowering wages. Add in unlimited immigration and the white man can't catch a break.

>>513685648 (OP)
>What is the most right-wing belief you have?
I never interact with niggers on social media, ever. If I read a tween then see the profile pic is a black I stop and keep scrolling. Interacting with niggers is a waste of your time. Im not trying to 'win' any 'debate' with someone who has a IQ 30 points lower than mine.

>>513687083
How old are you boy?

>>513685648 (OP)
I dunno i would bribe north african countries so refugees cant come here or only a fixed contingent.

>>513687286
Niggers are professional shit talkers. It's part of their culture. Total waste of your time. They have YEARS (decades) of practice and hundreds of lines memorized. While you are thinking about stuff like the fall of the Roman Empire niggers are thinking about how to get under someones skin.

Niggers are very similar to jews in this way. Niggers and Jews have a lot in common, and this point should be repeated often.

>>513687337
You had that with Ghadaffi and you let him be killed. He was the one man holding back the floodgates of niggers into Europe.

>>513687292
probably twice as old as you.

>>513687003
Under capitalism, yes.

>>513685648 (OP)
First of all, you’re a retard. There’s no such thing as “right-wing” faggot. That’s just a psyop.

Second, this is probably some honeypot thread. But I don’t care. 1. I think the majority of Jews should be systematically genocided, and the rest should sterilized be put in a surveilled enclave. 2. All Indians should have their genitals snipped off. No exceptions. 3. People who run factory farms should have to face reciprocal punishment. I think we should actually stuff them in tiny cages and torture them, or use them for experimentation instead of mice, monkeys, etc. Those are probably my most radical beliefs.

>>513687390
Me? Look at your fucking flag.

>>513687452
>There’s no such thing as “right-wing” faggot. That’s just a psyop.
jesus christ.

>>513687452
>some honeypot thread
I think the same. I also believe that whatever I say will end up completely useless or even detrimental to them in the end.

>>513687494
First time on /pol/? You need to lurk for two years before posting.

>>513685648 (OP)
Ive been looking for this pic awhile, wish it was fullsize though. :(
Also "right" and "left" are jewish concepts from the French revolution. National Socialism transcends left and right.

>>513687580
OP has 3 post and it will be a 'real' thread on the front page for a change. Maybe something decent for the lurkers.

>>513685648 (OP)
trump is a kremlin asset
Mcarthy did nothig wrong

>>513685648 (OP)
Meditations on Welfare
A Brief Preface for the Observant Reader
Let us consider the machinery of society not merely as a collection of men and institutions, but as a living organism, fragile, susceptible, and guided by incentives invisible to most. In these meditations, we examine how a single policy, embraced with the best of intentions, may twist the course of generations, and what consequences follow when short-term gain supplants long-term prudence.

I. The Inversion of Natural Selection
Welfare is fundamentally flawed because it diverts resources from society’s productive members to sustain the least fit, thereby interfering with natural selection and inverting its function. The result is a dynamic in which the least fit multiply—enabled by resource abundance and their inability to plan for the future—while the productive are stripped of the means to raise families, leaving them fewer in number and less inclined to contribute. The long-term effect is a regression of the human species itself, a decline both visible and undeniable.

II. The Welfare Machine and the Fragile Equilibrium
Welfare operates as a machine generating dependent voters for regimes that prioritize their own enrichment and retention of power over the long-term viability of the state. This produces a fragile equilibrium: for a few generations, society survives on the residual productivity of its past. But those reserves are consumed ever faster, as the unproductive segment expands while the productive segment—taxed to sustain the system—shrinks. Over time, this dynamic accelerates systemic decline, undermining both societal resilience and inter-generational stability.

>>513687616
eat a dick nigger. but thanks for bumping the thread anyhow.

>>513687733
III. Democracy and the Fatal Component
In modern democracies with universal suffrage, this dynamic becomes fatal. Once the dependent population exceeds the productive population, removing the corrupt politicians who initiated the welfare system becomes politically impossible. The very voters sustained by welfare perpetuate their benefactors in power, guaranteeing continued resource diversion.
The system accelerates toward collapse: the government eventually runs out of funds, triggering widespread hunger, civil unrest, and sudden deaths. The structure is parasitic: corrupt politicians form the parasite’s head, welfare recipients form the digestive system, and the productive population constitutes the host. Together, the parasite devours its host—society itself—provoking systemic death.

Final Considerations
What is described here is neither myth nor fantasy, but a sober meditation on incentives, demographics, and human nature. The machinery of welfare, if left unchecked and intertwined with political self-interest, carries within it the seeds of its own destruction. A civilization may survive for a few generations on the fumes of its former vitality, but these fumes, consumed exponentially faster than they are produced, will vanish—and with them, the society that mistook generosity for stability.

>>513685648 (OP)
No brown people deserve the rights and protection of the law, if you're brown it shouldn't be illegal to shoot you at first offence no matter how small
Jews are descendants of neanderthals that were eating ancestors of whites and it is been existential battle between the two the whole history
Browns are also just different species that only exist to serve, and they earn for it too

>>513687860
Toward a Sustainable Polis: A Proposal for Post-Welfare Governance
Preface: The Necessity of Structural Reform
History demonstrates that societies relying on welfare without constraints create a self-reinforcing cycle: corrupt politicians perpetuate dependency to secure power, while the productive population bears an increasing burden. The inevitable consequence is collapse. Any meaningful reform must address the root mechanism, not merely the symptoms.

I. The Root Problem: Political Parasites and Dependency
The collapse of welfare-driven societies is not an accident. It results from a simple dynamic: politicians seeking short-term retention of power deliberately expand the dependent population, converting recipients of state aid into perpetual voters. This strategy ensures survival of the political class while depleting societal resources, ultimately undermining the productive base and threatening systemic survival.
Traditional countermeasures—voter education, anti-corruption laws, or caps on welfare—fail to address the structural incentive: as long as votes can be bought with redistribution, politicians will exploit dependency to remain in power. Any post-collapse system must therefore align voting power with net contribution to society, making the act of participation in governance contingent on sustaining the community.

>>513685648 (OP)
any of my views on
>niggers
>jews
>faggots

i want them all to be put against a wall and mass executed

>>513685648 (OP)
I bet this is a glowie baiting retards lmao

>>513687675
Been here since 2007 Fren.

>>513687970
II. The Net-Tax-Payer Voting System
The proposed system is straightforward in principle, rigorous in consequence:
1. Eligibility: Only individuals who contribute more in taxes than they receive in welfare can vote. This defines a “net-taxpayer” as the arbiter of political authority.
2. Neutrality: This system makes no distinctions of race, gender, or personal wealth beyond net societal contribution. The metric is economic responsibility, not identity.
3. Enforcement: Governments maintain precise accounting of taxation versus welfare disbursement per citizen. Eligibility is updated periodically, reflecting current fiscal contribution.
4. Consequences: Political incentives shift. Politicians must now appeal to productive, net-contributing citizens, eliminating the advantage of expanding dependency to secure votes.

III. Expected Outcomes
• Elimination of Perverse Incentives: Politicians can no longer rely on dependency to maintain power; systemic corruption tied to welfare expansion is curtailed.
• Alignment of Policy with Productivity: Public policy is now informed by those who sustain the state financially, ensuring decisions favor long-term societal survival over short-term political gain.
• Self-Correcting Feedback: As citizens recognize the tangible link between contribution and influence, cultural norms evolve to value productivity and responsibility, further stabilizing the system.

IV. Addressing Objections
• Equity Concerns: Critics may argue this disenfranchises the poor. Yet the system measures net societal contribution, not wealth alone. Low-income individuals who contribute more than they consume retain full political agency.
• Complexity: Administrative tracking is required, but modern fiscal systems already record taxation and benefits. Precision is achievable; enforcement is a matter of design, not principle.

>>513685648 (OP)
There is quite literally nothing wrong with non lethal eugenics

>>513687684
McCarthy didn't go far enough. Trump is an agent of Tel Aviv, not Moscow.

>>513688066
Transitional Risk: Initial implementation may provoke unrest among previously enfranchised dependent voters. However, the long-term survival of the polis justifies short-term adjustments, especially in a society recovering from systemic collapse.

Conclusion: A Rational, Resilient Polis
The net-taxpayer voting system is a precise, rational response to welfare-driven collapse. By restricting political influence to those who sustain the state economically, the system eliminates the incentive to expand dependency, aligns policy with societal survival, and establishes a sustainable feedback loop. Quantitative projections confirm that, if implemented rigorously, the post-collapse polis can stabilize and gradually recover, transforming past structural weaknesses into long-term resilience.

>>513688058
Very cool. I dabbled a little back then mainly on /b/ but noped out pretty fast. Pics were too sketchy back then.

Honeslty, I would gas all the kikes and gypsies. Actually a few years ago, me and a few friends of mine threw a molly into a gypsy house. Heard some gypsies died afterwards kek

>>513688203
Welcome to the thread fellow oldfag.

>>513685648 (OP)
Property rights for women through divorce, second marriage, whooring should go away. Illegal to divorce

>>513688414
Thanks anon.

>>513688423
>Illegal to divorce
people think this is a bad idea but it'd make women get A LOT more picky about marriage and do more long term dating.

>>513688367
Tf is a molly?
In Weimerica, it means a party drug.

I'm just really fucking tired of working with women. Mostly white women. At least latina or black women can be flirty and give compliments that you make you feel decent.

For all I care niggers can have white women and choke on that faustian bargain. Because I know she's gonna try some bullshit after Tyrone's had a rough day at work and he's gonna snap and beat the shit out of her.

>>513688693
anon this is not a right wing view. this is anti-white woman demoralization.

>>513688621
Nigger the simps are always there. The U.S has a 50% divorce rate between men and women with 80% of them initiated by women. Yet dudes still get married. I ask young guys at work.
>Would you board an airplane if it had a 50% chance to crash?
They overwhelmingly respond, no. Yet they'll still get married, because they all imagine that they will be the 50% that makes it.

>>513688762
That's just my experience with them anon, you work with them for a long time and you just come to those conclusions.

>>513688892
>The U.S has a 50% divorce rate
people are getting married too fast after a few years of non-serious dating. people are marrying people who are blatantly a bad match for them but are too stubborn to see it.

>>513688655
Short for Molotov-Cocktail, the memeflag might be German, as I know I've used it and others aswell, it's not something new.

>>513689076
Anon I've merely entertained the thought in casual conversation with women that maybe sex after marrying isn't such a bad idea and I've never talked with a woman who responded positive to the idea. Even if you bring up the benefits like.
>the guy is committing to you
>he's not using you for sex and actually loves you
>he's STD free, especially if he tested
Women are completely against it even though they can't really specify anything negative about the concept and most of the positives benefit only women.