>dogs are divided into different "breeds"
>but these two people are considered the same and aren't divided like dogs are and race doesn't exist according to scientists

Explain this /sci/

Perhaps dog breeds are not a great comparison because they are created over tens or hundreds of years, whereas Asians branched off from Europeans ~45000 years ago and Africans 60-80000 years ago.

That said, human races do exist despite all the dancing around it.

>>513710335 (OP)
Breed is a term that only applies to variations within domesticated animals. There are no breeds of naturally occurring organisms. For that terms like ecotype are used

Because behavioral genetics, as embraced by the managerial regime, functions less as an objective science than as a legitimizing ideology—a tool deployed to rationalize and preserve the ruling class’s political axioms. Any broad acceptance of inherent group differences, particularly racial inequality, would undermine the moral foundations of managerial orthodoxy and threaten the entire ideological architecture of the 21st-century Anglosphere.

>>513710335 (OP)
Retarded comparison. There is more genetic diversity between Africans than there is between a White and a Chinaman. Human "race" exists in a gradient and if you're still thinking about genetic clusters as analogous to dog breeds then you are mentally deficient.

>>513710338
Correct. Better said than i ever could.

>>513710335 (OP)
Breeds are made up by humans just like human races. The existence of mutts is laughable because unlike what autistic kennel club managers insist, mutts exist on a smooth gradient between breeds - the only reason why they're not in a breed is due to purely subjective reasons

>>513710337
Humans are domesticated animals.

>>513710342
You just might be

>>513710339
This. Broad genetic groups exist, but the way the term race is used by hairless monkeys with iphones has always been about looks and culture because of our tribe oriented brains

>>513710338
>"This wrong because da joos are making us brown or something"
Back to pol retard

>>513710345
No it's wrong because it's immediately obvious based on basic observation that it's wrong.

>>513710335 (OP)
FACTS:
Not ONE of the top 100 world rated Universities is run by Black Africans
Not ONE of the world's 500 largest companies is run by Black Africans

You can NOT blame RACISM for 1.5 BILLION people being unable to run ONE world class university or Business.

We ARE the same species, we are NOT the same!

>>513710335 (OP)
Your argument is valid but I still like Asian girls.