Jew. So much Jew.

>>513734709 (OP)
>finkelstein

@grok what does his early life section say?

EVERY

>>513734781
Fpbp

>>513736007
SINGLE

>>513734709 (OP)
It is a deliberate attack, not a fucking oops, death to jews, jew bioweapons and jew golems are 100% called for.

>>513734709 (OP)
>but encouraging white majority resentment as a response

So does he mean. The idea that white people as a majority being resented is bad.

Or that white people, being the majority, and resenting mass migration is bad.

this is also true

>>513736227
He means now that Whites are a minority they shouldn’t be resentful.

>>513734709 (OP)
>WHITE POWERRRRRRRRRRRRR

Mass immigration wasn't an "error", it was the result of imperialism and american interventionism
They destroyed south america and the middle east, so people flee their war torn shithole countries and go somewhere that's both peaceful and more prosperous

>>513736007
>>513736113

>>513736113
TIME

>>513734709 (OP)
nice tracking dot

>>513736476
The problem is that their populations weren’t totally eradicated so they don’t migrate.

>>513734709 (OP)
>Multi-ethnic societies are hard. I’m not saying they should be hard. To be quite honest, people’s failure to live and let live baffles me. I’m just saying that they are hard.

>There are great advantages to pluralism; of course there are. Advantages to individuals, like my parents, who can find safety or build a better life in a foreign land. But also to host nations, which benefit from different perspectives and from people who arrive with energy and imagination. But nonetheless, maintaining harmony and stability turns out to be difficult. And that is not simply because not everybody in a mixed population is energetic and imaginative.

>So from Vietnam to Venezuela, and from Serbia to the Sudan, multi-ethnic countries struggle to maintain their balance, suffering civil wars and violent struggles for domination between groups. Even where the outcome is less dire, ethnic tensions can come to dominate politics. Which is why for more than a quarter of a century, in active politics and in this column, I have been warning against allowing mass migration into the UK.

>My concern was less the numbers than the speed. Let us welcome people, but not huge and rapid movements that have allowed little or no time for integration. It was, I argued, a reckless policy we would come to regret. It was an uncomfortable position at times. Not least because I am the son of refugees and keenly aware of the impact of saying no to people who want to come here. But I held fast, nonetheless. My family has been safe here precisely because of British culture. We want to be part of it. I hope we have enriched it but I would never wish either to ignore it or erase it.

>>513736720
>The course of modern politics in Britain, I fear, has vindicated these warnings. Among the most valuable political assets is victimhood and most political disputes consist of groups arguing over who should legitimately be considered the most victimised. This has now attached itself to ethnic groups. There has been the Black Lives Matter movement, calls for “decolonising” museums and the curriculum, demands for reparations for slavery; rows over antisemitism in the Labour Party; fury over the way the mainstream has ignored Muslim sensibilities over schooling and Gaza. And now the white majority population is making its own bid for victim status. The country is being invaded by foreigners is the claim frequently made, leaving its natives the victims of sex crime and economic exploitation.

>My purpose here is not primarily to assess the value of these claims. I have views, of course, thinking, for instance, the demand for slavery reparations ridiculous while other claims of victimhood (my own among them, naturally) are more plausible. Instead, I want to note that mass migration has produced a multi-ethnic society, that multi-ethnic societies are hard and that we need to stop making things harder.

>It may have been reckless to have allowed mass migration at such speed. But we have a multi-ethnic society and we aren’t going to unhave it. And the pressure to allow more people to come here will not let up. It is the product not only of foreign conflicts but also of people escaping extreme poverty and having the ability to assess where they wish to live.

>So now, the job of statesmen is to make what we have work as best it can. And there are certainly things we can do.

>>513734709 (OP)

I dunno, I for one welcome white people chimping out. Because when they chimp out, they chimp out. Let's turn the hands backward a few notches on the ol' progression clock.
Humanity can only benefit from the death and destruction of the weak and unworthy.

>>513736776
>The first thing is to stop deepening the problem. Mainstream democratic politicians simply cannot tell voters that we are unable to stop people moving here illegally and are unwilling to restrict how many people move here legally. If there are international conventions that prevent immigration control, we have to change them. If there are courts that insist on an expansive view, we have to reform them. If there are technical barriers to enforcement, we have to overcome them. Failure is not an option. Letting in thousands of illegal migrants, including large numbers of young men here for economic reasons, and housing them in local hotels is simply not a viable policy.

>Second, we have to insist upon integration. Gentle tolerance of the religious practices and idiosyncrasies of all sorts is very British. But if people come to live here, they choose to bend to the British way of life. It’s reasonable to demand that.

>Third, we have to tell the truth. The Times, led by my late and lamented colleague Andrew Norfolk, was the first mainstream media outlet to expose the grooming gangs scandal. I wrote many editorials on the subject, each pointing out the disastrous mistakes that had been made because people were afraid of being called racist. Such cover-ups make tensions worse, quite apart from being wrong in principle.

>There is one more thing we have to do. We need to choose stability and peace over fear and resentment. We need to demand that our politicians choose to lead the whole country rather than engage in a race to see who is best at finding outrages and building an audience for themselves on TikTok.

>>513736814
>There is obvious political gain in exploiting tension and becoming the articulate champion of ethnic grievance. It can win seats in parliament, as the independent Muslim MPs demonstrate, and being the champion of majority white grievance can bring even more than this. Perhaps it can bring government. The only political hitch is that you can be outbid — Robert Jenrick by Nigel Farage, Farage by Rupert Lowe and so on — since victim status is a bottomless pit.

>But it is a disaster for the country. Portraying every migrant as a sex pest, whipping up protest mobs, thrilling at the potential for ethnic violence, pretending that white people are being dealt with more harshly by the courts than ethnic minorities, suggesting that Britain (which we all have to go on living in) has been entirely destroyed, fantasising that the police (the police!) are organising pro-migrant protests — all of this is calamitous and irresponsible.

>Scouring the internet to find a primary school that serves halal meat and claiming (ludicrously) that “it is now impossible to wish someone Happy Christmas” may bring the psychological benefit of vindication along with short-term political reward, it may help produce an audience for an insurgent campaign, but it is not statesmanship. It is a politics that should be shunned.

>I accept that this probably sounds a bit quaint. So be it. I realise that combining a tough position on immigration with some sort of limit on the exploitation of feelings of white victimhood is now deeply unfashionable. But I can’t advocate open borders and I can’t join in ethnic war, either.

>I still think there are enough of us who feel this way to make a bit of a difference. And if you are one of them, I’m glad to have had a chance to say what we both think.

>>513734781
FPBP

>>513736720
Do jews not understand that this kind of rhetoric makes a lot of people want to strangle them?

>>513735911
Son of Steinberg & Bergstein

>>513736476
Interventionism, etc, can exacerbate mass immigration, but border policy is the issue here. You cannot migrate if you cannot physically enter. There are ports of entry, that must be used, and if they do not follow proper procedures, they should be shot like in Poland.

>>513737050
I think they're aware, but they also recognize that people don't have the ability to do anything to them legally, and that they are a protected class in many places. The online resentment further allows them to claim victim status. That being said, we should still be very vocal about our disgust. You know what they say: You get what you put into this world.

>>513734709 (OP)
this war is the best thing that could have happend for our goal to get rid of the kikes in our governments

They want to establish a jewish empire in the Middle East while they are whining about white people being racist

>>513734709 (OP)
>Reckless error
They really want a bullet in their face, don't they?

>>513734709 (OP)

Oy Vey! OYEST OF VEYS!!! what have We done

>>513734709 (OP)
Well yeah, but it's too late to cry over spilled milk.

>>513738628
they cant help temselves. The enternal parasites and subverters

>>513734709 (OP)
>Now that you're soon to be a minority there is no reason to give a fuck what you think. Here's an article gloating about the fact that three generations of you were tricked into accepting conditions leading to your obsolescence.

>>513736227
He means that they were stupid to bring in so many rapists and thieves and murderers, and that it would be worse to encourage an uprising against white people.
Implicitly, because we would rape the rapists so unbelievably hard that the Jews would sacrifice themselves to stop the slaughter. And then the slaughter would continue faster.

>>513734709 (OP)
>haha whoops, we destroyed your countries, please don't kill us
lol
lmfao

>>513734709 (OP)

>>513734709 (OP)
(((STEIN)))

>>513737735
Yeah legally but at some point when there is nothing to lose law matters fuck all, they are actually end up being victims if they continue this kind of stuff

>>513740620
hanz whetter
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4FYtNQ8izM0

>>513740643
That kike in particular needs to die.

>>513734709 (OP)

>>513734709 (OP)
it's only a 30 year reckless error
oy vey, goys
why are you so resentful