>>513879274>Every anon could form one. But the question then becomes how to attract members and deal with the inevitable assaults by antiwhites.Rejecting the ideal of a "group" is the first part. There never is a group, your either a normie, a sympathizer, or a participant in advocating for the advancement of your....group.
Once you mention race, the normies flip out and label everything racist and then it snowballs from there and goes downhill..so you have to tell them the soothing lie,
"We are all Mel Gibson fans"
"We all really enjoyed the passion, so much"
"It's not about color, it's about Mel Gibson's plan for all his children "
Then before you know it, you have normies cheering "vermussen der juden asroten" and marching in unison with happy faces.
If you have a large group, it's obviously going to get co opted by feds and or pressure from their supporting groups (see gangs talking) will grind you down into making mistakes or overthinking things until you do a dumb minor thing like run a stop sign or litter and they charge you and your on "The Program" where they dictate what you can or can't do, then throw you in jail for violating one of 30 bullshit rules that of, and from there your chances of employment get hurt and if it's a small town the rumor mill grinds you down.
But, if you have a large amount of decentralized leaderless clubs in one local area, the amount of resources and brain power they have to throw at it quickly becomes overwhelming where now you have them dedicating most of their time and resources into following people who work for a living and are mostly nonviolent, simply because it isn't one group, it's a loose interconnected mesh of people who have a few basic signs and code words to signify they are on the same team.