Long Wikipedia Argument Over Attempt to Fix Page of "Q" Actor John de Lancie - /pol/ (#513900557) [Archived: 67 hours ago]

Anonymous ID: LHiMUCYOUnited States
8/25/2025, 12:29:05 AM No.513900557
1702229061035545 (2) (3)
1702229061035545 (2) (3)
md5: 7bc31ad7af1331f6deeb9511ab4a7427🔍
Image in op is only a small portion of the ample discussion, refer to the below links for all of it:

Main Bulk of Discussion:
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:John_de_Lancie/Archive_1#Roles_mentioned_in_first_paragraph:_Q/Discord

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:John_de_Lancie/Archive_1#New_Edit_Proposal_for_Discord_Mention_in_the_Lede

Other related discussions:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/IncidentArchive1143#h-User:FlightTime_showed_bad_editing_etiquette_&_abused_their_admin_powers_to_thre-20231208000900

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Dispute_resolution_noticeboard/Archive_240#John_de_Lancie

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Dispute_resolution_noticeboard/Archive_241#John_de_Lancie

TLDR: The user wanted to move the mention of his Discord role to be mentioned as his most well known role along with Star Trek's Q, but the other users did not agree. Do you believe that this edit was justified? Yes or no? I'm looking forward to the discussion. This edit caused quite the discord...
Replies: >>513900699
Anonymous ID: KQWQMByBUnited States
8/25/2025, 12:30:56 AM No.513900699
IMG_3622
IMG_3622
md5: 623f52b26f4637fcdf6ac222b6e4ced5🔍
Go to hell jidf>>513900557 (OP)
Replies: >>513900952
Anonymous ID: r5CthjN7United States
8/25/2025, 12:34:49 AM No.513900952
>>513900699
how is this thread Jewish