>

>>513954333 (OP)
So Trump won?

Then I guess him accepting a disadvantage in order to end an objective evil, mail in voting, proves he's good and cares more about what is right than what benefits him personally.

>>513954333 (OP)
Trump is not running again and the poster said that other gop candidates wouldn't do as well with mail-in votes, so what's the problem for him. Even without that outcome, Trump will end mail-in votes for being too exploitable in practice.

>>513954463
>...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4FYtNQ8izM0

>>513954463
Absolutely. Trump has the well being of the country in mind . He's cleaning up the voting process. Doing the right thing even if it hurts you is a prime example of a good leader.

>>513954333 (OP)
>never interrupt your enemy when they're making a mistake
if mail-in ballots favor Trump and the Republicans, then let them get rid of it.

I love open borders and trannies. We're all voting for Gavin, right groyper bros? Democrats are based

Does this consider the dems' mail in ballots too? Because everywhere was saying dem votes are largely mail in which is why so many dem votes are counted during the later counting process and why the lead narrowed in 2024. Seems to me like they're pointing to something insignificant to prevent getting rid of mail in voting that benefits them.

>>513954463
Except if mail in voting disproportionately benefits R's it hurts his claim that mail in voting exists only to help Dems steal elections. The reality is Trump is a stubborn, illogical person and simply grabbed onto the very first thing he thought of to argue he didn't actually lose in 2020.

>>513956203
If getting rid of it will help dems them why are they always throwing a fit about it? It's the same for everything. The system supposedly heavily favors republicans but the second anyone tries to change anything the democrats get up in arms about it. It's pure deception.

>>513956530
>If getting rid of it will help dems them why are they always throwing a fit about it?
Perhaps for the very reason you argue Trump wants to end it: they're principled.

>The system supposedly heavily favors republicans but the second anyone tries to change anything the democrats get up in arms about it.
Holy strawman

>>513956203
Except that's not what is says doofus. Trump gained 9 points over 2016 in mail in votes and lost 5 points in 2024. Dem gains/losses weren't even mentioned. It wasn't a comparison.

>>513954432
He can only beat women in elections.

>>513958548
Yeah. Women are pretty incompetent. Good point, Anon.

>>513959436
Thanks.

>>513955655

The problem is that in 2020 they justified mailing out tens of millions of ballots because of the pandemic even though some laws to do this came about before covid.

People documented leading up to the election that people were getting ballots at their house for people who didn't leave there, and ballots were getting sent to vacant addresses, and in some cases fake addresses and vacant lots were used as addresses. Democrats absolutely used mass mail in ballots to stuff ballot boxes.

>81 million votes

They only got to this number with various dirty tricks, and fraud. They harvested the fuck out of the tens of millions of ballots they sent out.

>>513954333 (OP)
Yes because Trump activates voters who AREN’T politically active. Dems do better with lower turnout in this scenario because 40 year old libtard Betty and 27 year old Shaniqua with a bachelor’s are voting every 2 years and routinely vote Democrat. Trump wins the 23 year old guy and 47 year old plumber that voted like 2-3 times this century