You can’t burn flags in public just as a means of giving the veterans and police the middle finger.

Burning flags as a roundabout way of saying “fuck you” to conservatives and vets that might be standing around isn’t protected under free speech.

It never was fully protected under free speech the way liberals thought it was. Like burning the flag outside a veterans home because you think he’s a conservative and don’t like him is flag desecration.

>>513970358 (OP)
shut up you silly faggot
I'll tell you that in person too as I burn any confederate or American flags I want

>>513970358 (OP)

Good Goyim

>>513970458
Burn all you want, after your in cuffs I’ll be laughing and having a beer at your expense

Weren't they trying to ban and prosecute israeli flag burners? Best I figure is they didn't want to ban one without the other

Burning the flag is nothing compared to to war in Israels name, especially against the interest of America

>>513970519
Durka Durka…

I love the faggot hypocrisy.
>Guy takes down lgbt flag hanging on church
Gets 5 years, didn’t burn it and did it at night when nobody was around. TOTALLY COOL

>Faggots and blue haired lesbians desecrating flags and setting them on fire in front of vets and cops get charged and arrested
REEEEEE YOUR A GOY, your a good boy for doing to us what we have done to you. Only goys get even or believe in equal treatment. If you don’t want to be a goy then you should let us do whatever we want to whatever we want

>>513970358 (OP)
Based. This will be the perfect way to kill Trumpers.
Burn and destroy flag, kill anyone who lays a finger on me, including cops. And be completely protected by the Supreme Court.
Republicans are just death marching into the void by refusing to adapt to a new world. You lost, everyone hates you because you behave like uncivilized losers, there is no reality where you win without creating a North Korea type country, but that's also a losing bid (look at North Korea).

>>513970358 (OP)
>If you ignore the time they said flag burning is constitutionally protected, they've never said flag burning is constitutionally protected

>>513970358 (OP)
I thought burning flag laws were on the books for at least 100 years. did I wake up in wrong timeline again?

>>513970358 (OP)
if the purpose is to start a fight then that would constitute imminent lawless action so baiting people to (attempt to) kick your ass by burning a flag is not protected under Brandenburg v Ohio decision.

>>513972379
I think you meant that the other way around. I know people right now that if they catch you trying that gay shit to their flag, you’ll have an AR aimed at your underdeveloped forehead. And if you were to do much as act like you were feeling brave they’d turn you into Swiss cheese.

You and your fairy friends have lots of fun getting yourselves in wax coated cardboard boxes