Anonymous
ID: 7iTzPobM
8/25/2025, 9:41:08 PM No.513971784
Most modern psyops focus on the epidemic of male loneliness. OnlyFans serves as a platform for legalized human trafficking and as a social experiment. Its popularity is linked to rising isolation among men and declining societal values, making it almost integral to daily life.
Women use it for financial gain, while men often seek to fill a void. For many men, it’s about more than just porn; it’s about finding a parasocial relationship.
When those in power recognized the time and money men invest in OnlyFans, they saw an opportunity to exploit this aspect of the human psyche for their own agendas. This is what I call the weaponization of male loneliness, which underpins many psychological exploitation efforts.
Many "online political movements" lack a foundation in shared morals or ethics. Instead, they comprise individuals desperately seeking companionship, even if that connection is insincere.
When you engage with them, regardless of how compelling your arguments are, they often tune you out. They’re not genuinely interested in politics; they may subconsciously recognize their inability to grasp complex issues. They participate for the sense of belonging, not because they care about the future.
This explains why grifters enter these discussions, even when their involvement seems illogical. They quickly identify easy targets to extract money from. Their main motivation is profit; they seek crowds that yield the most clicks with the least effort. Both the griftee and the grifter are driven by instinct, lacking deeper thought.
You can often identify these individuals by specific phrases in their Twitter bios. These phrases signal to lonely users and create a false sense of belonging, making them feel part of an exclusive club. In reality, anyone can add such phrases, rendering them meaningless markers of loneliness.
Women use it for financial gain, while men often seek to fill a void. For many men, it’s about more than just porn; it’s about finding a parasocial relationship.
When those in power recognized the time and money men invest in OnlyFans, they saw an opportunity to exploit this aspect of the human psyche for their own agendas. This is what I call the weaponization of male loneliness, which underpins many psychological exploitation efforts.
Many "online political movements" lack a foundation in shared morals or ethics. Instead, they comprise individuals desperately seeking companionship, even if that connection is insincere.
When you engage with them, regardless of how compelling your arguments are, they often tune you out. They’re not genuinely interested in politics; they may subconsciously recognize their inability to grasp complex issues. They participate for the sense of belonging, not because they care about the future.
This explains why grifters enter these discussions, even when their involvement seems illogical. They quickly identify easy targets to extract money from. Their main motivation is profit; they seek crowds that yield the most clicks with the least effort. Both the griftee and the grifter are driven by instinct, lacking deeper thought.
You can often identify these individuals by specific phrases in their Twitter bios. These phrases signal to lonely users and create a false sense of belonging, making them feel part of an exclusive club. In reality, anyone can add such phrases, rendering them meaningless markers of loneliness.
Replies: