Thread 513977216 - /pol/ [Archived: 162 hours ago]

Anonymous ID: vaeWn69aUnited States
8/25/2025, 10:53:13 PM No.513977216
92847821
92847821
md5: 7ecec9fabb541489c2e2206a64a5ad4a🔍
Trump mindbroke the left so bad they're now screaming they can't burn the American flag.
Replies: >>513977329 >>513977353 >>513977393 >>513977490 >>513977571 >>513977578 >>513977636 >>513978073 >>513978120 >>513978357
Anonymous ID: WyvmZcN6United States
8/25/2025, 10:54:34 PM No.513977329
>>513977216 (OP)
Looks like someone wasn't a boy scout. Sad!
Anonymous ID: tXVLl12DUnited States
8/25/2025, 10:54:56 PM No.513977353
>>513977216 (OP)
burning the flag is better than burning the constitution
Anonymous ID: kJcwoTjwUnited States
8/25/2025, 10:55:31 PM No.513977393
>>513977216 (OP)
My most libtarded opinion is that burning the flag is free speech and therefore a human right.
Anonymous ID: qkRBdijoUnited States
8/25/2025, 10:57:03 PM No.513977490
>>513977216 (OP)
The American flag represents anti-whiteness and jew supremacy. Burning the flag is based.
Anonymous ID: QDuY2XbAUnited States
8/25/2025, 10:58:09 PM No.513977571
>>513977216 (OP)
>Trump mindbroke the left
Go back to r/thedonald faggot lmao
Anonymous ID: hzMd05zFUnited States
8/25/2025, 10:58:13 PM No.513977578
>>513977216 (OP)
>The majority of the Court, according to Justice William Brennan, agreed with Johnson and held that flag burning constitutes a form of "symbolic speech" that is protected by the First Amendment. The majority noted that freedom of speech protects actions that society may find very offensive, but society's outrage alone is not justification for suppressing free speech.

>In particular, the majority noted that the Texas law discriminated upon viewpoint, i.e., although the law punished actions, such as flag burning, that might arouse anger in others, it specifically exempted from prosecution actions that were respectful of venerated objects, e.g., burning and burying a worn-out flag. The majority said that the government could not discriminate in this manner based solely upon viewpoint.

https://www.uscourts.gov/about-federal-courts/educational-resources/educational-activities/first-amendment-activities/texas-v-johnson/facts-and-case-summary-texas-v-johnson
Anonymous ID: xyZifxWJUnited States
8/25/2025, 10:58:55 PM No.513977631
This is probably one of Stephen Miller's 4d chess moves.
>ban flag burning
>leftists protest by burning the flag en masse very visibly in public
Leftists can't help themselves from stepping into these bear traps
>bad optics
Anonymous ID: acJhpcCUUnited States
8/25/2025, 10:58:58 PM No.513977636
>>513977216 (OP)
burning a flag is protected speech.
only a zognaldbot would selectively apply rights to american citizens.
Anonymous ID: cHeikx0PUnited States
8/25/2025, 11:01:25 PM No.513977829
You're supposed to burn the flag if it touches the ground
Replies: >>513977925
Anonymous ID: acJhpcCUUnited States
8/25/2025, 11:02:37 PM No.513977925
>>513977829
america touched the ground in 1964. can we burn it?
Anonymous ID: MhRtJ1/bUnited States
8/25/2025, 11:04:34 PM No.513978073
>>513977216 (OP)
The only people upset about this are anti-American so fuck them.
Replies: >>513978269
Anonymous ID: +q35yRgFNetherlands
8/25/2025, 11:05:07 PM No.513978120
>>513977216 (OP)
this guy is just getting more retarded by the minute
Anonymous ID: tXVLl12DUnited States
8/25/2025, 11:07:00 PM No.513978269
>>513978073
>valuing constitutional rights is anti-american
Replies: >>513978399
Anonymous ID: 2FwNywHOUnited States
8/25/2025, 11:08:18 PM No.513978357
>>513977216 (OP)
Ironically, America as a country is worthless without the 1st Amendment, so now there's no longer any reason to not burn the flag
Anonymous ID: acJhpcCUUnited States
8/25/2025, 11:08:50 PM No.513978399
>>513978269
zognaldbots are too stupid to understand liberty. they only care about what is good for israel.