In the absence of obedience to GOD in our societies, the first principality that takes over is Baal, the owner, causing rulers and governors to become oppressive.
The second principality to take over is Ashtaroth, the whore, and it is chief over lustful debauchery. It's temples feature harlots and cross dressers, societies over come by that spirit promote and celebrate sexual debauchery of any kind and pornography becomes common place either with graphite or idols.
The third principality to take over is Moloch, the destroyer. A society that produces unwanted children from fornication will eventually sacrifice their infants to Moloch. The worship of Moloch also leads to the corruption of creation with technology, turning living organisms into idols.
>>513981905Friendship with this world is enmity with GOD for the same reason. You can be a part of the Body of Christ or a part of the body of Babylon. At least from our prospective today.
>>513983197Who's perspective? You and your pirates?
>>513983619>Who's perspective?Everyone that lives today.
>>513983801does it help prevent scurvy?
>>513983197>I am a Christian. He who answers thus has declared everything at once -- his country, his profession, his family; the believer belongs to no city [nor country / civilization] on Earth but to the heavenly Jerusalem.- Saint John Chrysostom
This perspective is mentally ill.
Telling people to abandon their civilization (i.e. France, Germany, USA, Western civilization as a whole) for some globohomo New Jewrusalem that isn't even relevant to this World is schizo talk. Like an international proletariat communist pipe dream telling the workers to abandon their station and work for international communism.
Truly a proto-bolshevism.
>>513981905Leviathan is a Levi. Same as a Jew. Levi even angered Jacob and had his inheritance taken from him
Why did you post this lost tribe for?
>>513983619Me and my fellow 12 members of the holy church of discord
Rousseau accuses Christianity of separating Church and State:
https://www.earlymoderntexts.com/assets/pdfs/rousseau1762.pdf
>You may ask: ‘Why were there no wars of religion in the pagan world, where each state had its own form of worship and its own gods?’
>My reply is that just because each state had its own form of worship as well as its own government, no state distinguished its gods from its laws. Political war was also theological war; the gods had, so to speak, provinces that were fixed by the boundaries of nations. The god of one people had no right over other peoples. The gods of the pagans were not jealous gods
>This was the situation when Jesus came to set up on earth a spiritual kingdom, which, by separating the theological from the political system, destroyed the unity of the state, and caused the internal divisions that never ceased to trouble Christian peoples. This new idea of a kingdom of 'the other world' could never have occurred to pagans, so they always regarded the Christians as really rebels.
>However, as there was always a prince and civil laws as well as a church, this double power created a conflict of jurisdiction that made it impossible for Christian states to be governed well; and men never managed to discover whether they were obliged to obey the master or the priest.
>Several peoples, however, even in Europe and its neighbourhood, have tried to preserve or estore the old system–tired and failed, because the spirit of Christianity has won every time. The sacred cult has always remained or again become independent of the sovereign and not essentially linked with the body of the state.
>The philosopher Hobbes is the only Christian writer who has seen the evil and seen how to remedy it, and has dared to propose bring the two heads of the eagle together again, restoring the total political unity without which no state or government will ever be rightly constituted. But he should have seen that Christianity's domineering spirit is incompatible with his system, and that the priest's side of the divide would always be stronger than the state's. What has drawn down hatred on his political theory is not so much what is false and terrible in it as what is just and true…
>But this religion, having no special relation to the body politic, leaves the laws with only the force they draw from themselves without adding anything to it; which means that one of the great bonds for uniting the society of the given country is left idle. Worse: so far from binding the citizens' hearts to the state, it detaches them from that and from all earthly things. I know of nothing more contrary to the social spirit.
>Christianity is an entirely spiritual religion, occupied solely with heavenly things; the Christian's country is not of this world.
>But I'm wrong to speak of a Christian republic–those terms are mutually exclusive.
