Anonymous
(ID: gz4yprzw)
9/6/2025, 6:35:00 AM
No.514929996
[Report]
>>514930100
>>514930274
>>514939965
A conversation between Adolf Hitler and Dietrich Eckhart on Jews
Hitler exclaimed, “We’ve been on the wrong track! Consider how
an astronomer would handle a similar situation. Suppose that he
has been carefully observing the motion of a certain group of
celestial bodies over a long period of time. Examining his records,
he suddenly notices something amiss: ‘Damn it!’ he says.
‘Something’s wrong here. Normally, these bodies would have to
be situated differently relative to one another; not this way. So
there must be a hidden force somewhere which is responsible for
the deviation.’ And, using his observations, he performs lengthy
calculations and accurately computes the location of a planet
which no eye has yet seen, but which is there all the same, as he
has just proved. But what does the historian do, on the other hand?
He explains an anomaly of the same type solely in terms of the
conspicuous statesmen of the time. It never occurs to him that
there might have been a hidden force which caused a certain turn
of events. But it was there, nevertheless; it has been there since
the beginning of history. You know what that force is: the Jew.”
“Yes, certainly,” I replied, “but to prove it, to prove it! For the
last fifty or hundred years, so far as I’m concerned, it’s been
obvious; indeed, a good deal further back, perhaps even in pre-
Christian times. . . .”
an astronomer would handle a similar situation. Suppose that he
has been carefully observing the motion of a certain group of
celestial bodies over a long period of time. Examining his records,
he suddenly notices something amiss: ‘Damn it!’ he says.
‘Something’s wrong here. Normally, these bodies would have to
be situated differently relative to one another; not this way. So
there must be a hidden force somewhere which is responsible for
the deviation.’ And, using his observations, he performs lengthy
calculations and accurately computes the location of a planet
which no eye has yet seen, but which is there all the same, as he
has just proved. But what does the historian do, on the other hand?
He explains an anomaly of the same type solely in terms of the
conspicuous statesmen of the time. It never occurs to him that
there might have been a hidden force which caused a certain turn
of events. But it was there, nevertheless; it has been there since
the beginning of history. You know what that force is: the Jew.”
“Yes, certainly,” I replied, “but to prove it, to prove it! For the
last fifty or hundred years, so far as I’m concerned, it’s been
obvious; indeed, a good deal further back, perhaps even in pre-
Christian times. . . .”