Thread 515090633

What are some politically incorrect implications of 98% of people being fucking retarded?

>>515090633 (OP)
lel

It means that I will never make it as far as people with no morals or ethics.

idk i bought a bunch of these funny little bitcoins in 2010.

>>515090898
Same

Is this actually real or did he make this up for engagement bait

lol had a buddy that lost 150K + another 300k he convicned his pops to loan him investing in fucking online stickers nfts lmaoooo. Im pretty sure he clocked out with less than 5k.

the only fools that bought into this shit was like 16-19 year old kids and dumbies who were jealous as fuck and seething that they missed the early crypto booms like BTC and shit

>>515090633 (OP)
This has to be fake...right? Right guys? This isn't really real is it....?

>>515090985
>This has to be fake...right?
Isn't the whole premise of NFTs is anyone can verify ownership

>>515091066
Of a cartoon pic on the internet? How is that worth even $1?

>>515091185
bro that's not even the most expensive one. Punks nft goes to millions and there's buyers

>>515090633 (OP)
That you could kill half of them and still be outnumbered 25 to 1?

>>515090633 (OP)
That tweet reads like a derivative of pic rel

>>515090985
Maybe this individual case, but the NFT market crashed years ago wiping out the most gullible retards inherited wealth.
Not a single fucking person who works for their money was investing into something that stupid, they got money from their family and were told to invest it so they chose the hip new bitcoin.

IIRC the bored apes group started on /biz/ and was a scam from the get go.

>>515090633 (OP)
Im still throwing a tantrum because i want to quote logical fallacies at people reeeeee

>>515090633 (OP)
I still don't understand what an NFT is. Is it just a shitty JPEG with an ownership address built in? Is it basically the retarded version of investing in original artwork? Does Hunter Biden release NFTs?

>>515090633 (OP)
The political implications are the society we’re living in

>>515091564
You remember how companies used to sell people ownership of stars?
Essentially that, the jpegs themselves weren't on the blockchain they just pointed at google drives.

>>515090898
Hitler exists. You just need to be choosen or follow the choosen one. The whole natsoc party isn't going exactly saint but they are far more moral than the current ruling class.

>>515090633 (OP)
laughing at retards' self-inflicted wounds is one of the last joys in my life

>>515091564
the nft is just an address on the blockchain an that specific address is associate with the jpeg
but its not like its real ownership because actual ownership of something, like property, is recorded by the state.
in theory the state could use something like the blockchain to record ownership of the jpeg or anything, like a house, but it doesn't
it was all code + theory + scam

>lost almost half a million on a picture of a cartoon monkey
what a time to be alive

>>515091338
Can I do it? You want to buy "friendly black man" NFT from me?

>>515091866
>recorded by the state
okay but what if the state decides you don't own it any more? they can just change the record to say they own it since you didn't pay your property tax.

>>515091564
No it's literally a code that points to a cloud storage copy of a JPG, and the idea that having that code is "ownership"
Most of them were just randomly generated character avatars for Twitter being sold as some kind of collector's card for people who want to invest but are too stupid to understand how. Basically a scam targeting Elon Musk's exact demographic.

>>515090633 (OP)
These are the people who claim to be such galactic brain geniuses that they should be made our feudal overlords btw

>>515092061
>okay but what if the state decides you don't own it any more?
well yes that is how it works. if the state says you don't own something anymore you don't.
the state has the monopoly on violence.
in reality you don't actually own anything beyond what you can hold in your hand a secure with the threat of violence.

>>515092043
How much?

>>515092490
I wanted a million, but will settle for $31,000. It has to be worth at least a mil though. You are getting a pretty good deal.

>>515092221
>the state has the monopoly on violence.
Not if you can shoot an intruder in your home.

>>515092864
The state decides if that's worth sending their own armed group to shoot you, anon.
The government could kick down your door and execute you and say they found themselves not guilty and there's 0 recourse.

>>515091866
Now this is the level of midwittery I like to see.

>>515090633 (OP)
The fact that it was almost entirely white people that did this NFT shit is why I can never be truly racist. Almost every white person on the planet is a nigger.

>>515090633 (OP)
Anyone with half a brain knew this was the direction NFT's were headed, the smart ones pumped and dumped that shit long ago.

>>515093547
becoming misanthropic doesn't really make you any less racist, you just graduate to eugenics

>>515090633 (OP)
>Celebrities like Justin Bieber and Stephen Curry, who invested in Bored Apes, have seen their investments lose value. A class-action lawsuit has been filed by celebrities, including Bieber, Paris Hilton, and Madonna, alleging that they were misled into buying the NFTs.

>>515093917
Didn’t faggot ass Eminem buy one too? Only morons like these people.

>>515093131
Depends on the state. In MS or AR for example, the police are the ones that tell you to shoot the intruder. If your property is "posted" you can shoot them for just coming on your property.
In any case, it isn't a "monopoly" as the other anon suggested. An armed populace always has armed resistance as an option.

There's a reason Jews say most people are cattle.

Since they cannot help themselves and never will, you might as well profit from it.

>>515090898
I have no morals or ethics, and high intelligence, even drive, and I accomplished a lot so far but I acknowledge a lot of wasted potential not being an elite like the others. I'm uninhibited and unhinged and still just want to be left alone, live in nature away form sociey and everyone until I die.

>>515094606
if your so smart solve p vs np
checkmate jeet nigger

>>515090633 (OP)
I don't get it I have all the apes for free

>>515092813
Do you accept checks?

>>515091564
current NFTs are useless jpegs but theoretically, via the blockchain, you could make your mortgage an NFT. once you do that, it's like the first baby step to eliminating banks. i see why people would be interested in that aspect, but literal millions will die before we each this hypothetical bankless future so it's all a giant mug's game

Funny how everyone was investing on these massive scams just a couple of years ago
>metaverse
>nfts

>>515094882
No, but I will accept an NFT of a check.

It would be OK if you were able to somehow tie NFTs to real-world pieces of art as a means of authenticity.
As it stands, no matter how pretty a piece, no-one is going to pay thousands of dollars -- outside of retarded hype-beast "the next BitCoin" buy-in gold rushes like the BAYC were -- for digital artworks.
They're just not.

You can't be as impressively creative or impressively imaginative with digital artwork as you can with a real-world piece.
You just can't.

Real-world pieces *actually* exist, don't need NFTs to be authentic (they are naturally authentic, as in, they are simply themselves), can have more impressive dimensions, can vary in texture and material, and can occupy a space impressively whereas NFTs are just ... a .jpeg on a big screen at best.
Sure, you can make the big screen look pretty ... it might even be a very expensive HD 10k resolution screen or something.
Hell, you may even place a pretty picture frame around the TV and go down the hyperreality route, make it look like an actual picture in a gallery.
But it's not a picture in a gallery --
it's a fucking .jpeg on a fucking LCD screen.

You can make digital media look like anything without much effort; and they all use the same dimensions, they exist on a flat screen on a fixed two-dimensional plane; and you can make perfect 1:1 digital copies of all the pixels and the image hash with just a right-click and save. Or fuck it, a copy and a paste if you want to get technical.

With real-world art, it can be big, small, 2D, 3D, play with light, play with shadow, play with both light and shadow, be textured, be smooth or rough, be jagged, be made of a whole variety of interesting materials, can invoke emotion through sensory input like smell or hearing, can be interactive, play with their environment, comprise multiple medias at once; and so on and so on ad infinitum possibly.

A .jpeg on a screen is just always gonna be a .jpeg on a screen no matter how you dress that window (or screen).

>>515090633 (OP)
Eugenics are not only good but necessary.
Because statecraft is hard it's easier to do it right once than hundreds of times, so globalism is unironically the future.
Tkd will be needed to free the world from banks, they are too lazy not no default back to wanting money to reproduce on it's own.

>>515091338
here's the thing... BAYC is OFF-CHAIN.. the NFT is just a link to some webpage with a pic of a monkey.. PUNKS are ON-CHAIN. they will exist as long as the ethereum network exists. It is immortal. The monkey dies as soon as the web page that contains it goes down (link rot). PUNKS are stored on EVERY ethereum miner. The blockchain is where the Punk resides. This is why punks sort of have value.

If you bought any exotic EV from the last 10 years, you are in the same boat. Eventually those cars will reach the end of their service life(no more batteries being made, no more connection to servers, etc) and you'll have a $1M piece of useless trash sitting in your garage with all your other expensive disposable trash.
Yes, people with $1M-$20M are what is called "nigger-rich" and they always go broke.

>>515090633 (OP)
Faggot loses 400k and still can't put his mistake into words. Many such cases.

Yes MOST people are retarded, and a little less than most are MENTALLY ILL. People don't act based on logic and research. The main reasons they do things is because other people do them or it feels good. Democracy puts those most able to manipulate the most prep people into power. That's not a good system. People who value NFTs do not vote in their, or the peoples interests.

>>515090633 (OP)
This guy had 425k to spend in the first place. I have never seen this amount in my lifetime.
I don't think he's dumb at all. I admire him. Why should I hate him? Sad he made a bad incestment, but congratulations

>>515090633 (OP)
we need to cull every sub 120 iq retarded cunt
kill them all
i realize this will kill every woman but artificial wombs are already a thing

>>515095222
yeah but eth is a centralized shitcoin that will eventually collapse
also why would anyone want to buy a jpeg of a nigger smoking a cigarette for 4 million dollars?

>>515090633 (OP)
BAYC=BAJS

>>515091564
When we say something is fungible we mean it's like paper money where if I swap a 20 with your 20 it doesn't make a difference, and said paper bills can be circulating around and are interchangeable.

Then we have tokens, where I can take something like say 1 ETH and make as many of a given token as I want so like 1,000,000 paddynigger tokens get "minted". These were also fungible, someone could then trade them around and whatever the price of a paddnigger token is in ETH or BTC or USD would be the same per paddynigger token.

The idea behind the non-fungible tokens was that there was effectively a (digital) signature for each token. So you knew which token was which. Then people got the idea of let's take a jpg for each individual token, now that they're separate they could be treated like digital collectables. To take it further when minting the tokens you could even do what they do with collectable cards where certain ones would be rare. That was the idea behind it. And people thought oh cool so there could be an equivalent to a Michael Jordan type token which could be worth a lot of money.

Now it could've been cool if these tokens were actually connected in a meaningful way, like there are collectable card games for example that have a utility outside the art on the card. One thing that I thought maybe had potential was representing in-game items (think for MMOs) as NFTs. But I think Steam basically banning anything to do with NFTs killed that angle. I'm also not saying that this thing would've been a new Bitcoin or something but just that it might've carved an interesting niche in the digtal space (equivalent to card games or something).

But I think ultimately these things were like a solution looking for a problem and greed and hubris overtook the normies. Also on chain you don't know if some fag is just trading tokens with himself (for more ETH each time) creating fake demand, that also gave it scammy vibes to me.

>>515095431
this. he is making moves in the arena some of us will never be able to

>>515090633 (OP)
I remember that Eminem and other rappers used these ugly monkeys as avatars, probably to promote the scam and make normies buy it

>>515090633 (OP)
I may be miserable, have fucked up health, and nothing good in my life, but I will never be as pathetic and retarded as these people.

>>515090975
this might help
this ryder ripps made a clone and now they're suing for likeness
https://www.coindesk.com/policy/2025/07/24/yuga-labs-bored-ape-yacht-club-usd9m-win-against-ryder-ripps-overturned-must-better-prove-trademark-infringement

>>515090633 (OP)
anyone got the screencap of the guy losing his life savings on "bingus token"?

>>515090633 (OP)

the retard that paid 37g's for an nft is a bigger retard than the faggot who lost 400k. At least that retard had all the peer pressure in the world at that time, swearing that NFTs were the next big thing. This other dumb nigger really dropped thirty-seven large on something that has been fundamentally debunked as a scam.

This is just another one of the LORD's miracles at work, keeping undeserved riches out of undeserving hands. Some of you were born to live and die poor, get with the program please. It's for your own good.

>>515090633 (OP)
unironically the biggest loser here is the one who spent 37k on a jpeg in fucking 2025

>>515095658
That's the classic mistake of thinking that because something is unique it's valuable. Modern art is based on this fallacy. Rather than being an expression of rare talent or wide aesthetic appeal, modern art is treated as valuable solely because it's unique. The art market is fake and highly manipulated. True value requires broad appeal AND rarity. Monkey pictures, or digital collectibles, never had broad appeal.

As for rarity a screenshot of a digital image captures the exact properties of the image, making infinite perfect copies possible and available to everyone.

Anyone who took it seriously was either a scammer or a scamee.

>pic being possible
the global market is fucked

>>515090633 (OP)
honestly the faggot diserved it for buying into NFTs im pissed at the whole culture because they took over tech that could have had a good use for archival purposes.

>>515091866
That's why this tech was killed with fucking monkey pictures. Imagine if selling your home or car removed all of the middle men(jews).

>>515090633 (OP)
>Three years ago, I told myself I wasn't just "buying a jpeg." I was buying culture. I was buying access. I was buying a ticket to the "future of the internet."
No, bro. You thought you were buying the next Bitcoin and that would be a billionarie because you owned a monkey cartoon
kek

The Ape NFT shit was beanie babies for zoomers.
Now they've done it again for Alphas with the labubu shit.

>>515090633 (OP)
I mean you can copy past that ape and you still have it.

>>515090633 (OP)
>i made a huge mistake and learned a lesson
>so now i will explain the lesson to an audience
no thank you, i don't want to learn from someone who makes stupid decisions

>>515090633 (OP)
That means the bottom is in, NFT SEASON IS STARTING BOYS

>>515096393
Part of me hopes all the NFT shit comes back full swing and this new buyer sells this shit for like a 20x so this Ripps retard can feel like a bigger idiot.

>>515090633 (OP)
You idiots keep getting this wrong.
He didn't buy a jpeg.
He bought a receipt for a jpeg.

>>515096437
Check out telegram nfts, people paying 60k+ for plushie pepe

>>515092061
then people just bootleg more things without even the fear of legal trouble
fact is though, most copyright when it comes to ip only really get challenged when a big company feels like its worth pursuing, because law suits are expensive and can be seen as bad pr if they are going after the guy who is just drawing fanart of a character for commisions

nft idiots were the only people who thought it was reasonable to start suing people for saving an image

>>515096760
>labulu

>>515096760
i am getting way to old because those damng things remind me of benie babies.

>>515096949
they are basicly acting like the ad companies who want to sue ublock because it destroys thier buisness model

>>515096785
Learn, no.
Erase all doubt, that nagging little voice that say "but what if?"
That's why stories of people who make examples of themselves have some value.

>>515094606
>I have no morals or ethics
Typically Estonian
>high intelligence, even drive,
Doubt. I've never ever met an intelligent Estonian. The most retarded American and the most streetshitting Jeet is still miles above the average STEM degree holder from Estonia.
>I'm uninhibited and unhinged
That's so Estonian. Let me divine: you get like that when you have a few glasses of alcohol in you?
By the way, high IQ is associated with higher prosocial behaviour: smart and intelligent people tend to act in way that respect and benefit others due to their ability for abstraction and theory of mind. The high IQ and lack of morals and ethics is a stupid meme. Just google IQ and prosocial behaviour and see for yourself.
And
>I'm uninhibited and unhinged
are traits of low IQ impulsive cluster B personalities, who get ahead in life not because of intelligence, but because of manipulation and abuse of people and power systems that they learned in their childhood home where they were raped every day by mommy and daddy.
The latter fits you more cozily than high intelligence. Just like every other Estonian.

>>515090633 (OP)
>Imagine buying some stupid cartoon monkey NFT and not an actual Trump NFT.

>>515097209
Based Russian chad tearing the mini-finngoloid a new asshole

>>515096471
Right at least if it was tied to something like a game, and that game is fun to play and has players then rare items correspond with some advantages in the game or something like that which translates to something.

I remember watching a video on how someone was making these NFTs and it was just a folder of bits like eyes, hats, t-shirts and so on and then a very simple program that was creating images with a weighted random (layering them on top). So yes, it had 'rarity' but there was no demand or utility for these, they were just shitty drawings.

I think with the BYAC they knew this and tried to make it seem like a status symbol and artificially create demand. The only real signal normies saw was price. But like the post you replied to wrote, because this was all just on chain, there was nothing stopping someone from just trading tokens for Etheruem back and forth for higher and higher prices, trying to convince normies that there was real demand and then we saw the greater fool in action. And I think a lot of the people that had Ethereum to play with likely did dump on a lot of these idiots who "FOMO'd" into a jpg because the ETH price was rising and they better buy it now before it gets "too expensive".

>>515091564
So basically, regular block chains like ETH or BTC, it's a ledger. Each item is Address (User) gave X amount of token to Y user.
There's no arbitrary metadata in that. Summing up all that information is how you get how much someone owns.

NFTs? Each ledger transaction can contain arbitrary metadata. Can be any type of text. Including, let's say, a URL to a regular webpage on the internet. Or not even a webpage. How about a URL to an image? Maybe an image of a faggoty looking cartoon monkey?

That's... It. That's the whole premise. That particular ledger line item can be attributed to an address and you can prove you own that ledger line item. Meanwhile, the URL it points to? Someone could change whatever that image is at any time by changing what's at the source the NFT metadata points to. Someone could also make ANOTHER NFT that points to the same thing. It'll be a different line item in the ledger though.
Even funnier, a URL could be used and the website domain gets lost or shuts down. Then the URL resolves to nothing.

>>515090756
isn't this kid a trustfundfag? like this won't hurt him at all?