Anonymous
(ID: 8FXtncnM)
9/8/2025, 6:45:17 AM
No.515096467
[Report]
>>515096614
>>515096736
>>515096934
>>515097175
>>515097239
>>515097364
>>515098486
>>515098669
>>515098672
>>515101604
>>515103923
>>515104013
>>515106435
Eat The Rich
I can't think of any good reason why we shouldn't eat the rich. All of the usual coping and bootlicking doesn't really do it for me.
>They're job creators!
So are small business owners and mom&pop's, but they hoard far less wealth at the type. How is better than a co-op?
>They help invent and innovation
No billionaire has ever invented more than one thing (if even). They exploit and tap actual creativity, and usually stifle further innovation/competition through monpolies, lobbying and patent hoarding. Examples like public research, github, open source, etc. should prove well enough that innovation doesn't require some billionaire or corporation.
>We need their taxes!
Which they often don't pay. Or they hide it offshore, launder it in art or other assets, bury it in so deep in shell companies/llcs that the IRS can't afford to track it down. We didn't have this deficit, until the rich started paying lower tax rates.
>They earned it
If they earned it, then they wouldn't have any employees. It's like if a baseball team won the World Series and you only gave the manager or owner a trophy. Fine, all billionaires and corporations with zero employees can keep all of their wealth. That's fair...oh, but they did use the roads to move their goods, the telecoms to advertise their services, the society that purchased their products...
Scrap that one, too.
>They're job creators!
So are small business owners and mom&pop's, but they hoard far less wealth at the type. How is better than a co-op?
>They help invent and innovation
No billionaire has ever invented more than one thing (if even). They exploit and tap actual creativity, and usually stifle further innovation/competition through monpolies, lobbying and patent hoarding. Examples like public research, github, open source, etc. should prove well enough that innovation doesn't require some billionaire or corporation.
>We need their taxes!
Which they often don't pay. Or they hide it offshore, launder it in art or other assets, bury it in so deep in shell companies/llcs that the IRS can't afford to track it down. We didn't have this deficit, until the rich started paying lower tax rates.
>They earned it
If they earned it, then they wouldn't have any employees. It's like if a baseball team won the World Series and you only gave the manager or owner a trophy. Fine, all billionaires and corporations with zero employees can keep all of their wealth. That's fair...oh, but they did use the roads to move their goods, the telecoms to advertise their services, the society that purchased their products...
Scrap that one, too.