>>515582387
>someone who is incapable of thinking logically
Anon, you wouldn't know what logic is if it smacked you upside the head, I wager. There are millions of logical conclusions one can make off limited or stunted evidence and those conclusions can have friction with each other. Just because someone came to a different conclusion from the available pool of data doesn't mean they're "incapable of thinking logically." This tells me you have a fundamental misunderstanding of what logic is.
Also sometimes when you investigate something, there can be seemingly clear signs of internal foul play substantiated, without literal dictative evidence available. Example:
You're a P.I. trying to solve a murder. You arrive at the scene and something reeks of foul play based on the way the body is laying, past history of the person, the caliber of round used to shoot them, the bullet hole(s) in walls/windows, etc. You also know multiple people in the police dept didn't like this guy, and some had an axe to grind against him while putting on a straight face to the public.
You don't have direct dictated evidence it was an inside job, but you have enough environmental evidence to look further into it. Of course the police dept will take you off the case if you tell them that you suspect someone INSIDE the dept because that's too obvious. So you quietly begin collecting enough corroborative evidence to begin piecing together a more coherent picture.
That's how we autistic anons handle these situations. We don't know for sure Israel did it, but Israel has shown tendency to swing bigger hammers at those who once allied with them and then left their bedside opposed to those who simply never allied or hated them to begin with. Jews are the ultimate jilted lover.
It's also dangerous to discredit Mossad's ability to wage multiple conflicts asymmetrically simultaneously. Educate yourself on what "logic" actually is, you're surface level right now.