>>515770584
'Birth rates' are kind of a distraction, since they are self-correcting over time (people with breeder genes will become more of the population). But if you sabotage your demographics during a period of lower birth rates, the situation may not be recoverable.
>>515769639
This all turned out to be cope, unfortunately. I remember stories from the 2010's predicting a 'Trump baby boom' and so on, but in real-life, the birth rate sank to below 1.6 per 100K, and whites started to decline in raw numbers due to aging a few years ago as well.
And anecdotally, things are simply NOT looking whiter across the US. I was in fucking eastern Tennessee not long ago, and it was not nearly as white as advertised. And people told me it had been changing in the past few years.