Thread 516622175

Why are British cops allergic to these?

we're all allergic as long parts come from india

they are so used to bowing down to royalty they forgot how

>>516622537
The royals own guns. Imagine not having a gun but your king can

>>516622630
But you can burn the palace down with the king inside without guns.

>>516622175 (OP)
If british cops had those, there'd be no british left to grift.

Imagine being a brit cop and having at best a nightstick and pepper spray and being asked to police a population of africans and arabs with knives who listen to rap music

Yeah, I'd rather go bully the boomer who posted something online

>>516623235
the only thing more humiliating than being forced to wear that outfit, is being arrested by the man wearing it

>>516622175 (OP)
British cop here. Cuurent and past governments have been allergic to spending money on police and criminal justice. There's this pervading themes of British exceptionalism that somehow we police better and everything comes down to the public's consent.
In short the issue of money is masked behind antiquated laws and principles

>>516622175 (OP)
everyone is allergic to the p320 anon

>>516625365
So cops don’t have guns there because the government doesn’t have enough money to afford it

>>516622175 (OP)
>P320

>>516622175 (OP)
You don't need a gun to harass citizens about their online banter.

>>516622175 (OP)
no loysense m8

>>516626404
No he's chatting shit. There's no political will nor civil will for armed police beyond a small specialist force. The idea of British policing is 'to police by consent' and the public don't consent to armed police.

>>516627876
Well that was all well and good when y'all were mostly British. Times have changed.

>>516628086
Yes, exactly, with diversity quotas and recruitment of non-Brits there's probably even less support for armed police.

>>516626404
Mostly
Its a comfy, non issue for govts to ignore
>>516627876
You are, quite frankly, wrong
The public dont give a fuck about consent of that sort. Not since they've fot
Gotten that they're the o es who report hurty feelings messages then complain cops are arresting people over it.
The public just was crime, violence, and criminals very visibly dealt with.
Guess what sending unarmed, conflict shy, underpaid rejects is going to achieve? The exact opposite
I'm completely reliant on some armed crew on most days 15 to 20 mins away to come save my bacon if there's a terrorist or manic with a knife or gun

>>516625365
>British cop here
haha! fag!

>>516622175 (OP)
They know it will blow their bollocks off while holstered is why

>>516622175 (OP)
I left my knickers in the lorry with my crisps. Brilliant crisps. Doing maths at Hospital. Pan is nice and hot.

>>516622175 (OP)
They'll get beat up and their guns stolen because they are cucks

>>516622175 (OP)
I wish Canadian police were unarmed too.

>>516625817
This lol

>>516622175 (OP)
civility

>>516623629
>british police
>arresting

>>516629036
If you're somewhere 15-20 mins away from armed police (you're not btw) then you're pretty safe from any form of terrorism or mass shooting happening in your area. Regular polling shows the public do not want armed police, members of the police do not want to be armed and the politicians do not want the police armed - the media seem to keep trying to push it though, especially pro-Israel GB News. It is not a financial issue. A Glock 17 would be the most probably standard issue sidearm and that costs £460, there are 146,868 police officers in the UK so it would only cost around £67,559,280 then maybe another £10-15mn to train.

>>516622175 (OP)
Nigga have you seen our police? They're being hired straight out of uni and can't even be trusted with pepper spray. I don't want them within a hundred miles of a gun.
Even the armed units are becoming more and more incompetent.

>>516622175 (OP)
issue the P320 to the trans brit cops.