>>516646362
Agreed on the overton window shift. There's a sizeable anti-zionist crowd now all vying over the narrative on the fundamental nature of zionism and it's roots. As a result, they'll be attacking each other over a lot of shit on whether it's an extension of western imperialism (communists), anti-human rights (liberals), anti-muslim jews (muslims), the israeli state leadership (tucker), some esoteric world government conspiracy (schizos), anti-whites jews (nat socs), jewish subversives (nationalists), etc. I sorta glazed over the fine details there, but the main motive and source of zionism is seen different among the groups from being caused by the american government, right wing israelis, the gop, the israeli government, religious jews, all jews, or influential/powerful jews.
Obviously the more race-blind anti-zionist wing will attack the racialist anti-zionists to delegitimize them as it is in their interests. They might view them as discrediting them by association.
For any nationalist, you'd want to uproot domestic jewish power (american jews), but the more moderate types will of course will do what they do with blacks and run defense for the vast majority of them in institutional positions on the principle that it's "not all jews."
I think this is in part why Nick is taking additional flak. It's an open opportunity to push him out, and take more control of the conversation.
As a result of his more principled and reserved approach, he'll lose credit amongst anti-zionists. However, I think he'll edge out in the longterm over that impulsively dumb candace nigger. Might take some time.