Thread 518873267

Would it be objectively better if we somehow reverted back to ancient tech?
>sail and row ships
>spear and shield
>horses
>no electricity
>no firearms

>>518873267 (OP)
Yes. Yes it would.

>>518873267 (OP)
No.

>>518874464
ha. fag.

>>518873267 (OP)
no. imagine being forced to talk to normalfaggots for entertainment. I would kms

>>518874583
if they are that disagreeable to you why not just challenge them to a duel?

>>518874581
>NOOOOOO PEOPLE DYING OF CURABLE DISEASES AND AILMENTS THAT COULD BE FIXED WITH MODERN MEDICINE AND INFRASTRUCTURE WOULD BE HECKIN BETTER BECAUSE ITS COMFY AND WE WOULDNT HAVE MUH HECKIN INTERNETERINO AND ELECTRICITINO!!!
>IT WOULD BE BETTER BECAUSE WOMEN WOULD TALK TO ME IRL, WHO CARES ABOUT LIFE SAVING TECHNOLOGY AND OVERALL QUALITY OF LIFE?? NOOOOO

>>518873267 (OP)
>women in the kitchen
Im in

>>518874878
you seem vaccinated

It would be fucking cool, but most would die. We couldn't farm enough to eat without the modern production methods and machines. Even things like modern sewage treatment and water distribution become required.

>>518873267 (OP)
>Would it be objectively better if we somehow reverted back to ancient tech?
yes, you'd be busy rowing and we wouldn't read this bullshit from you
also the internet would not exist so we wouldn't even know your retarded ass asked that question
REVERT NOW!

>>518873267 (OP)
No, because any nation with an internal combustion engine would absolutely push your shit in.

>>518875296
sorry i bumped your bbc thread off the catalog anon

>>518875504
>bringing up nigger dick memes out of nowhere
mutt's law never fails

>>518873267 (OP)
>Dies from ingrown nail

>>518873267 (OP)
>Would it be objectively better if we somehow reverted back to ancient tech?

No joking, how did you know how the future turns out? After the AI burndown all modern tech is banned. About 70 years from now. About a quarter of the current world population. Yes, feudalism is back.

>>518873267 (OP)
we can't. we lost the technology.

>>518873267 (OP)
You can go to russia for this

>>518875741
oh you were looking at the tranny thread. my bad anon sorry
>>518875800
is that ancient eugenics?

>>518873267 (OP)
Think of all the things you hate about your life. Now realise that they'd be non-existent but for modern technology.
>Foreigners can't show up on your doorstep with a 12 hour flight
>Police can't put you under 24/7 surveillance to prevent you taking care of your own justice
>Bleeding heart faggots can't make their entire personality the current thing happening on the other side of the globe
>At any moment, you can just get a wagon to another city and start fresh, not haunted by mistakes of the past posted online
>Virtually all of the interest groups, like furries, trannies, MAPs, refugees welcome, homosexuals, etc., wouldn't exist if they couldn't find wider support online.

>>518876225
yes, but >>518875800

>>518874878
then just fix the part about women not talking to anon without the need to get the part with the mega-plagues, no?
you can be doing everything so well if people think about returning to the roman empire times to fix it, no?

>>518874878
It filtered the weak and dysgenics. Most of us shouldn't be alive today

>>518873267 (OP)
>sail and row ships
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZnwSEzCIcWc

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RPxktyL7SzE

>>518876952
now do the atlantic like the norse

>>518873267 (OP)
No.
Deporting all the browns will do the trick though.

>>518873267 (OP)
there is a point where technolgy implementation becomes maladaptive. Technology should allow humans to more effectively and efficiently engage with the environment to extract needed resopurces and maintain the existence of the species. Anything beyond that is at best a wastre of time, resources and energy, and at worst actively weakens humanity by physically seperating humans from the reality of living on the planet and warping perspective of that reality. Much of the first world is at that point.

>>518874878
The more medical science moved away from natural remedies, the more medical scientists realised that their pharmakeia is counterproductive and that fundamentally the only thing that can heal a disease is your own body.
Doctors are flooding patients with chemotherapy to the brink of death, and patients just wanna sit outside for 30 minutes before they croak and make a sudden recovery.
Who'd have thought that being locked in a hospital ward without sunlight means your mitochondria shut down and you die of the resulting disease.
It seems obvious.
Wanna know the stupid part? They already knew that, and refuse to implement changes to hospital wards and the general structure to bring more sunlight into the rooms.
It's difficult enough to get permission to bring patients outside. Bureaucrats want to feel important and won't give permission unless this was their entire idea and get to take all the credit for something they didn't do.

Unironically, fewer people would die if there were fewer pharmaceutical treatments available and there was no fucking choice but to drink clean sanitised water and sit in the sun for an hour every day.

>People would rarely leave their hometowns
Sign me up.

>>518873267 (OP)
Yes but only in warfare