>>518996842
I can't do online games because of the effort involved to be good and the fact that being good means nothing, maybe I should just play offline classics
>>518996718
It gets boring after extended periods of time or playing the same game/genre. Take a break and come back, if that doesn't work its most likely your dopamine receptors being burned out from a repeated experience.
>>518997049
I recommend emulators. Endless variety and free (for now). It's always fun to use a controller as well
>>518998963
anon what I said was the truth. Online gaming isn't fun to me anymore because the effort involved in becoming an elite player has no real reward or prestige attached to it. I've been world ranked in games and I got absolutely nothing for it.
>>519001592
yeah a small percentage of entertainers who play games for entertainment they often aren't even good at. Most gaming content creators aren't pros at the games they play
>>519001592
At a certain point why would you give ecelebs money? I don't understand subscribing or donating them money in general. I get the parasocial aspect but maybe I'm not permalonley enough to get it.
But why would you keep giving money while living in a shitbox while these "people" flaunt that they have million dollar houses and so much money that they have to buy businesses to post a lower gain while generating more than the initial investment over time.
>>518997049
in-game grinding vidya sucks
if its like mario cart with say 5min multiplayer races its kino af
a game should be so you can walk away for months and when you return its the same. sadly a lot of them demand daily attention. hence why there are so many soi tranny neets in the zoomer generation