Thread 519145218

"Because the idea of racial superiority was a widely held belief at the time, in the early days of archaeology a lot of historical achievements of non-white peoples were either ignored, downplayed, or were theorized to actually be done by white people. The ancient city of Great Zimbabwe is probably the most infamous example of this, to the point where the Rhodesian government in the 1960s and 70s censored archaeologists who said it was built by blacks."
Is this true?

First reply, I just broke this threads hymen.

Anyone else who posts after me is getting my sloppy seconds, my leftovers.

Just remember that the first reply is the most special reply and you'll never experience this thread the way I did and this thread will never feel the way it felt about me about you.

Its over, you might as well just go post on reddit and talk about how much of a "man" you are for replying on a thread that I pumped and dumped. Have fun with my scraps, cucks.

>>519145218 (OP)
>70's archaelogists
just say jews, anon

>>519145218 (OP)
yes, great Zimbabwe was the largest civilization in subsaharan Africa before the European invasion. Most of the sites were already abandoned at the time of contact, but there were over 200 such small enclaves with stone walls 30+ feet high

>>519145298
D-dad?
Please come home with those cigs and that gallon of milk you stepped out for.

>>519145218 (OP)
https://youtu.be/ORBBap-m0tY?si=SnySWUd2EwIacYJi

>>519145218 (OP)

Historical records have been manipulated in favor of whatever narrative TPTB decide.


They install retards like Hawass at Giza to prevent any real research into the ancient history of humanity.

Work archaeology is just a joke. Somehow we’re expected to believe the city of Troy was just a few huts but “Great Zimbabwe” was a massive sprawling Wakanda. It’s absurd even on the face of it. I’ve got to admit that the way the leftist dogma has slid into blatant and bad historical revisionism is actually almost hard to believe. The Big Bang was believable. This shit is so unbelievable you’d have to be an actual retard to buy it, but then again I guess belief works different among the noble descendants of Great Zimbabwe.

Perhaps, but I believe it's more likely that they're lying and exaggerating to suit their own political ends

>fake ruins

Egypt and Africa have some pathetic shit in common

>>519146457
politics;
>its absurd
>the revisionism is almost hard to believe
>you'd have to be retarded to believe this

>>519146085
>they stacked small stones 30 feet high omhywoaowawoawoawoaw trvly an advnced civilizvtion

its amazing to me that so few nigger civilizations managed to stack rocks that this is actually some type of massive accomplishment they had

Hahah silly Europeans thought any great civilisation must be Aryan because they are racist and stup-

>The R1b haplogroup has been identified in DNA analyses of several ancient Egyptian pharaohs from the 18th Dynasty, based on peer-reviewed genetic studies.
Key findings include:
>Tutankhamun, Amenhotep III, and Akhenaten (identified via the KV55 mummy): Assigned to Y-DNA haplogroup R1b in a 2020 study by Gad, Hawass, et al., which analyzed mummies from Tutankhamun's family. The profiles for Tutankhamun and Amenhotep III were incomplete but derived from the full KV55 (Akhenaten) profile due to confirmed kinship. A 2025 commentary by Ehret et al. references this R1b assignment (subtype M89) and suggests possible origins through Asian back migration or trans-Saharan connections, noting its presence in Chadic populations (though not specifying the V88 subclade).
>R1b has also appeared in some non-pharaoh ancient Egyptian mummies, such as one from the 1st millennium BCE in a 2020 study by Yatsishina et al., identified as R1b-M269 (rare in modern Egyptians but common in Western Europe).

It was probably built by arab slave traders.

>>519145218 (OP)
>Because the idea of racial superiority was a widely held belief at the time, in the early days of archaeology
your guy just admitted white people invented archaeology