Thread 519153390

Damn, I did not see that one coming..

>>519153390 (OP)
yeah kek its quite a stunning reversal after years of karabogaposting

definitely not on my 2025 meme calendar t b h

>>519153390 (OP)
i get that muhammad was doing it to gain sexual strength, but why did he want ibn mas'ud to watch it happen behind the cuck line?

Why are you saying it like that? Did something happen? That Hadith is not considered authentic btw.

Good. Good. Greeks only became Greeks when non Greeks entered the premise. This is not a safe space. Please leave

ZUTT ZUTT IN THE BUTT

>>519153390 (OP)
When I fall asleep tonight, will I get zutted in the butt?
I'm scared

>>519153390 (OP)
>Zuṭṭ is an Arabicised form of Jat. Originally inhabitants of lower Indus Valley, Jats were present in Mesopotamia from the 5th century AD
zutt=jat=jeet
fucking hell, lmao

>>519156302
>That Hadith is not considered authentic btw.
why are you lying?

isnad chain:
>companion, companion, trustworthy, trustworthy, trustworthy and sound, trustworthy
https://hadithweb.com/ahmad:3788

>>519156091
>why did he want ibn mas'ud to watch it happen behind the cuck line?
Asking the real questions

>>519156302
It's really convenient how islam is the only religion where it's followers get to simply pick and choose what was real and what wasnt

>>519153390 (OP)
Neither did Muhammad lmao

>>519153390 (OP)
Zutt-posting is the hardest I've laughed at a meme since that lady at the UN that looked like an alien a couple of years back. Good times.

>>519156946
they're not supposed to
there's a structured system in place for hadith grading
the system is retarded, but the lay moslem is supposed to submit to it rather than just handwave embarrassing ahadith as daif because they don't like it

>>519153390 (OP)
>jeetfarm thread

>>519155474
karaboga is for turks
not arabs
even tho they do worship the zutt slut

>>519157383
zuttbroken

and it's not even just the zutts

>>519156843
I might be mistaken. I've just heard an argument against it. Why would Muslims consider it authentic when they can just wave it away?
>>519156946
Not really, Quran and some of the sahih hadith are consideted authentic by most mainline muslims.

So is this real or not? It is just some meme?

>>519157652
>Why would Muslims consider it authentic when they can just wave it away?
because they can't.
calling bullshit on this would invalidate a shitload of other hadith crucial for established sunni jurisprudence.
hadith are graded based on known the reliability of the transmitters, they all have what's called an isnad that shows the chain of narration.

ibn mas'ud is the narrator of ~800 hadith, he's like one of the top ten guys.
he was also a companion to the prophet (this sounds prestigious but the companions (sahaba) number about 114,000, it IS an A+++ in a chain of narration grading though according to the system)

then you have next in the chain amr al-bakali, another companion. al-bukhari says he's good as gold.
then tarif ibn majlad al-sulami, who's "trustworthy"
then a bunch more trustworthy dudes filling out the chain.

>>519158890
is it real that poo-ham-head (pajeets bust up him) loved to get stinky poopy penises cramed and jamed in his holy meca holes? that he was a zlut for sweaty zutt cock? moohamad, the pro(lapse)phet of islam is a sissy faggy, dick sucking, ass gaped, homo gayboy? who probably used his child bride to lure well endowed pigs, goats, and camels to come fuck his royal brown asshole?
is that what you're asking?

>>519159218
an interesting tangential piece of trivia is hafs.
any time hafs ibn sulayman al-kufi in a chain of narration, the hadith is almost always considered garbage because he's a known liar and fool.
there are multiple different recitations of the quran, the version that most muslims (90 to 95%) use is the one recited by... hafs!
the quran is daif.

>>519159740
Yeah I mean it's fucking insane. And why are these old writers always so fucking vague about shit? He keeps talking about how he was le scared, but barely explains what actually happened.
Anyways I mean what actual counter to this is there? It seems to basically be what you are saying but if there is another explanation I'd like to hear it. So far it seems they aren't even trying.