Anonymous
(ID: OrCvdGMP)
10/23/2025, 5:54:39 AM
No.519585923
[Report]
>>519585756 (OP)
Yes, but almost anyone else as king please.
Anonymous
(ID: DkHWvWsM)
10/23/2025, 6:02:27 AM
No.519586319
[Report]
>>519586438
The big issue is, how is the leader chosen?
Hereditary monarchy doesn't work because of regression to the mean.zo what do you do?
I favor a monarchy of the type by which society had an objective series of measures to select the ruler. Measuring for leadership, honor, passion, intelligence, and wit.
To some extent, our current system of campaigns simulates that. But I think it should be much more explicit.
Each society will have their own gauntlet of measures, and therefore would select a different type of ruler.
An african nation might select the most ruthless and feared ruler possible. A Bulgarian nation might select the wittiest. The English might select the best orator....etc.
Each society develops their own gauntlet of tests and thereby the monarchy is always in the hands of someone who measures up to that society's standards.
As for the hereditary component. Perhaps the candidates for the throne would be selected democratically, although the king has a "guaranteed slot" for his own son or heir. That way the monarchy has some element of heredity, which is necessary. The king most know that his progeny can succeed him, and has every incenive raise them to be the absolute best there is.
Anonymous
(ID: DkHWvWsM)
10/23/2025, 6:05:19 AM
No.519586438
[Report]
>>519586319
Basically I think it's important that the final determination is done by "objectivd measures", like actual measuring real-world ability.
Perhaps candidates could do war games against each other, or take a gauntlet of IQ tests, or even a painting competition. It really depends on what that society's values are, for what tests they will implement.
Anonymous
(ID: TfoeVL/s)
10/23/2025, 6:06:38 AM
No.519586505
[Report]
>>519586890
>King SHABBOS Goy!
>Attack our enemies!!
>Oy Vey!
Anonymous
(ID: HJeM91lB)
10/23/2025, 6:08:07 AM
No.519586579
[Report]
>>519587025
"JESUS OF NAZARETH, THE KING OF THE JEWS." - John 19:19
Anonymous
(ID: HJeM91lB)
10/23/2025, 6:09:49 AM
No.519586662
[Report]
Revelation 19:16: "And on His robe and on His thigh He has a name written, 'KING OF KINGS, AND LORD OF LORDS'".
Anonymous
(ID: ucuGZnOw)
10/23/2025, 6:10:57 AM
No.519586719
[Report]
>>519585756 (OP)
Yes. Heaven is a monarchy. Hell is a democracy
Anonymous
(ID: HJeM91lB)
10/23/2025, 6:12:14 AM
No.519586781
[Report]
Revelation 17:14: "They will wage war against the Lamb, but the Lamb will triumph over them because he is Lord of lords and King of kings"
Anonymous
(ID: HJeM91lB)
10/23/2025, 6:14:14 AM
No.519586890
[Report]
>>519586505
Matthew 21:12-13
"Jesus entered the temple courts and drove out all who were buying and selling there. He overturned the tables of the money changers and the seats of those selling doves. 'It is written,' he said to them, 'My house will be called a house of prayer,' but you are making it a 'den of robbers'"
Anonymous
(ID: H09/ySdG)
10/23/2025, 6:17:25 AM
No.519587045
[Report]
>>519585756 (OP)
THEY TRIED RILING UP THE LEFTOIDS WITH THIS PSYOP BUT NO KANGS DINDU NUFFIN
Anonymous
(ID: KSoUiQNI)
10/23/2025, 6:53:04 AM
No.519588780
[Report]
>>519585756 (OP)
No, but the average slave cattle probably needs one.
Anonymous
(ID: w4wSkCmj)
10/23/2025, 7:45:09 AM
No.519591027
[Report]
>>519585756 (OP)
Britain is a monarchy and it's a worse shithole than the USA.
Anonymous
(ID: w4wSkCmj)
10/23/2025, 7:47:54 AM
No.519591169
[Report]
>>519585756 (OP)
I prefer Direct Democracy.
Anonymous
(ID: +apO8ogU)
10/23/2025, 7:50:41 AM
No.519591308
[Report]
>>519585756 (OP)
No. I would move.
People say that a lot but this would be enough to get me to go.
Anonymous
(ID: pYkYBB4i)
10/23/2025, 7:52:12 AM
No.519591375
[Report]
>>519585756 (OP)
no thats why i didnt vote democrat who destroyed democracy in their own primaries and just put a king or queen biden in front of the people
all while trump was voted for
Anonymous
(ID: w4wSkCmj)
10/23/2025, 7:56:32 AM
No.519591551
[Report]
>>519585756 (OP)
You have to be born into a royal house to be a king and have the right bloodline. You can't just declare yourself to be a king. All royal houses are mongrelized except maybe the House of David which exists among the Germans. But no one knows who is who. Kings are all dead. The era of kings is dead. There are no more real kings anymore. I thought I descended from the House of David and was going to be king of all Israel/Germanics but I am just a schizo mutt riff raff with delusions of grandeur. I used to namefag a lot here, you might recognize who I am. Now I support Direct Democracy since I am not real royalty.