Thread 520203822

After seeing all the spam that retarded browns and kikes make, I'm all for a digital ID, this is political.

We need digital IDs to end communist malinformation campaigns.

you think they'll digital ID them? Ahahahahahhahaa you expect their own countries to enforce it? They'll only require it for western countries.

>>520203822 (OP)
Shalom!

>>520203822 (OP)
what makes you think the digital ID would do anything to stop jeets from jeeting

>>520204015
>>520204187
>>520204277
they wouldn't be allowed on our internet without it, the way it should be.
I also want segregation

It's all fucking Jews you faggot. This Indian shit, this zutt shit, ALL OF IT is to take heat off the Jews.

Don't fall for it.

>>520204399
jews should be banned from the internet as well, once the GOP boomers are dead in five minutes they will have no friends left anyway

>>520204399
this
6th post best post

>>520203822 (OP)
kek imagine thinking Indians won't scam the digital ID system like nothing else. I don't think you understand the implications of billions of poos with fake ID cards running around pooing everywhere and scamming while the only people following the rules are white people like a bunch of cuck retards.

>>520204767
ok fine, then we should firewall india, israel, canada and the uk

UK and Vietnam starting digital ID now

>>520204854
So basically the digital ID then is useless since India will still do scams on a daily basis even with a digital ID only for white people.

Yes make it even worse with a digital ID only for white people because now poos can just steal your biometrics when the inevitable dataleak happens. Opps, now Rapewinder Sukdeep has your iris scans, your communication, your face, your social credit, your bank details and more to pretend to be you in his next scam call! What an amazing idea!

Just admit this entire system was broken from the start and offers people nothing but vulnerabilities just because some old senile Jews want control over the world.

>>520205269
ok, no digital ID but kill all jeets

>>520203822 (OP)
The internet was better before brown people flooded it. But it was also better when it was more anonymous. If the internet moves more towards something like kikebook where everyone is a namefag that's also shit.

What made the earlier internet good was that it was less centralised and corporate. We need to go back to the days where people actually ran their own websites, chat and forums. It's not actually that hard. There is a lot of open source software you can use to do that kind of thing. If people even put 10% of the effort they put into complaining about brown people on the internet into learning about how to self host and actually doing it, then things wouldn't be so bad. Also self hosting gives you complete control. If you really don't want Indians or Israelis visiting your website you can geoblock them and take measures like that. Invite only is another method of keeping out browns.

The white man needs to return to his roots. 20 years ago some of the sites I visited (that used things like PHPBB, wordpress or hand crafted HTML) some guys were running them off old computers (some in college dorms) and one guy was actually using an old laptop with a damaged screen as a webserver, which because it was such an old laptop plugged in all the time. These days there's nothing stopping people from buying some really cheap device like a raspberry pi type thing and connecting it to your internet router and running a bunch of services.

>>520205969
>What made the earlier internet good was that it was less centralised and corporate. We need to go back to the days where people actually ran their own websites, chat and forums. It's not actually that hard. There is a lot of open source software you can use to do that kind of thing. If people even put 10% of the effort they put into complaining about brown people on the internet into learning about how to self host and actually doing it, then things wouldn't be so bad. Also self hosting gives you complete control. If you really don't want Indians or Israelis visiting your website you can geoblock them and take measures like that. Invite only is another method of keeping out browns.
Problem is that the government wants to force digital ID even on your own hosted websites, so even if you want to be outside of their grip, they still want you inside because it drives up your costs and pushes out competition.

>>520205457
>ok, no digital ID but kill all jeets
You forgot a few other browns that are just as willing to wreck a society.

>>520206552
should probably start on the larger populations first

>>520206598
So all of them.

>>520205969
Reddit destroyed forums.

>>520206252
Kier Starmer was trying to sell it as this ID would serve as a way to prevent you from having to keep giving your details to companies, that this government issued ID could be used across both government and private services.

I can see them pressuring any internet services (via websites, mobile apps, games) that are owned by LLCs, i.e. to make businesses comply with this. But if you have some personal website or server, that's yours and you're not a business, I find it hard to believe they'll mandate things like digital ID.

Maybe it's clearer with an example. Right now, someone can go and play some online game via a third party service. That big company is also not only more likely to be pozzed and ban you for "racism" or whatever they feel like, but if some law like digital ID or relating to online "hatespeech" were to come into effect they will absolutely use their resources to comply with that, I wouldn't be surprised if in the future all of that moderation (even in voice chat) is just fed to an LLM and they just automatically ban you.

Now compare this with self hosting your own server. You set it up so things like your voice or text chats are encrypted (both on disk, and in transit). You only invite your friends you know IRL or people you trust online. You have your gaming sessions in privacy and you don't have to worry about some "AI" Jew banning you or some company asking for your ID because the government demands they do it. You are more free to speak your mind.

If it's just a handful of people that are self hosting then it makes it very easy for the government to pressure them. Or like in the EU they were proposing "chat control" where they wanted to be able to have a backdoor to decrypt people's private chats on messenger apps. The thing is that it will look suspicious if people start then moving from telegram to matrix and there's a lot more different traffic. Better to set these things up now before any such laws and not use third parties.

>>520208132
In Canada the government was talking about banning websites that had "harmful content" at the DNS level. Similarly this was done in the EU. The problem we have is fundamentally structural and not something we can just skirt around. Doing nothing against those in power trying to force their will on the rest of us seems to be the fundamental issue.

Yea same. We should have licenses to access the internet. Also licenses for speakers.

>>520203822 (OP)
This will just mean that the Jews and the new Hindu overclass of America are the only ones to use the internet. You’ll lose your job because your digital ID will be recorded criticizing the American oligarchs for ethnically erasing White Americans with Indians.

This transparent veil of “anonymity” is the only thing that allows White Americans to air their grievances while they complete their goal of ethnically cleansing us from America.
Why would you want to get rid of that? So you’re prohibited from talking online and forced to talk about your favorite nigger in the most recent sportsball game?

>>520208487
>The problem we have is fundamentally structural and not something we can just skirt around.
It isn’t about skirting the issue but about building a layered defence for the future. Set up and maintain private, encrypted channels now, so if state‑run infrastructure ever becomes even more hostile you already have a trusted network for coordination. Keep those tools looking ordinary a long‑running game server or a hobby site for example so they don’t raise suspicion. It's about building your own infrastructure now while it's still easy to do so. Not waiting until after they make it more difficult.

Encourage everyone to adopt the lowest‑risk actions that fit their comfort level, not because it's going to be a knock out blow but because it gradually adds stronger safeguards for those willing to take more risk. The government only has a certain amount of resources, if lots of things on the internet are all centralised and in the hands of corporations then it makes it very easy for some authoritarian and dystopian government to lean on them. And sure, that pressure might force at least some people to take things like self hosting or privacy more seriously but the vast majority won't. We have to create the future we want.