>>520326432 (OP)
>Should eugenics be considered the primary ethical framework in the formation of a so-called perfect ethnostate?
Part of Eugenics is also "survival of fittest".
Which means wild mutations must also exist in eugenics, if you try to breed to a specific goal. You'll most likely actually create an abomination.
Not trying to project, but numerous families have literally pure bred this situation time and time again and it often ends up in failure.
Spontaneous random mutations are a good thing.
>>520326528
Like this anon not understanding that some disabilities on specific chromosomes actually counteract other disabilities that are more damning that happen when eventual combinations come across (which is always possible).
Also
If you don't breed some level of violence back into your people, your people will become weak, effeminate, etc.
Look at the french for reference.
Only people more effeminate than them are the jeets.
Now they are being overwhelmed by migrants.
Guess too many of the fighting age males were killed off in that hundred year war or whatever and now all that's left is the betas.
