Thread 520469748

>>520469748 (OP)
Fuck almighty. God damn that is pure fucking slave cuckery. At least niggers on plantations tried to escape.

>>520469748 (OP)
mushroom grow on shit

>>520469748 (OP)
>>520469895

>>520469952
rainbow yarmulke
That's some funny shit, literally got the gay on their minds.

>>520469748 (OP)
Thank God this kind of christianity is dying.

>>520469748 (OP)
Christianity is in direct opposition of judaism.

>>520470288
how so? what church? who?

>>520470227
You are satanic assholes um no none of that is christianity as late as 1902 they were being burned and 1730 and 1448 1602 and 1797 you ca. Thank judeo freemapsnry christnity is not heretics keep trying to horsehot the dumbasses christiantiy exists before you fucking jews you love so much

>>520470227
P*otestantism is in its death throes

>>520470227
what is a christ?
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=MPHyR92MQic

>>520470432
The NT is directly antithetical to Judaism. There is no Judaism to Christianity, if you want to get to heaven you MUST accept Jesus. You cannot be a worshiper of any other being, only God through Christ.
Churches OTOH can warp this with easy. The problem with Christianity is not itself, it's churches that commit heresy. Which the overwhelming majority do now, especially Evangelism.
Jews cannot be God's chosen people, it is impossible. Anyone saying otherwise is blatantly committing heresy. It's not even a question.

>>520469895
Its called bribery anon.

>>520469748 (OP)
I'm so fucking happy Christianity is dead with everyone under 40

>>520471304
No, it's called being an enslaved whore.
>Pay me and you can fuck me, jews!
"Heh heh, okay goyim!"

>>520470288
>Christianity is in direct opposition of judaism.
Killed 80M europeans, Haavara agreement, poisoned norse symbols.

>>520471043
pic related

>>520469748 (OP)
Is this guy a crackhead? The jews converted gentiles(who the talmud claims aren't full humans) to a religion that says they killed the savior, then spend 1500+ years living in ghettos and being seen as leeches and blasphemers by europeans. Jesus literally whipped jewish bankers in the temple, when people say "what would jesus do?", this is actually an option in the bible. Jesus told them off over and over, they kept trying to kill him, he kept escaping, and then jesus gives up at the appointed time to complete his mission. And jews lost their status as god's people by turning their back to god. But somehow this cuck thinks modern jews have converted people to follow christ? This is heresy.

>>520469748 (OP)
>>520471043
>>520470227
>>520470288
>>520471964

Jesus is a Jew, a fictional character made up by the Jewish spin-off cult of Christianity.

Everything about Jesus is consistent with Jewish beliefs and traditions. He is believed by Christians to be the long sought after Messiah in Judaism. Jesus, as a first born son, sacrificed himself to to Yahweh to cement his authority as the Messiah which is in keeping with Jewish child sacrificial rituals, especially the sacrifice of first born sons (the preferred form of child sacrifice in the eyes of Yahweh). Jesus also declared himself the god of Venus, which is a highly prized title in the ancient world to spite the Jewish enemies which also claimed the title of the god of Venus which include Satan and the Babylonian god Ishtar, whose followers were growing in power at this time and produced things such as the Ishtar Gate. Ishtar is a god of whoredom, the literal Whore of Babylon.

Thus Jesus is nothing more than a Jewish fiction thoroughly embedded in Jewish traditions and narratives established no later than 400 BCE. And used to spite enemies to gain clout.

>>520472091
That's so rad and you don't even realize it.

>>520470288
Then why did they pretty much eliminate Norse, Celtic, Roman, Mayan and who knows what other religions, but allowed Judaism to exist for 2000 years? Not just exist, but have exclusive rights to usury!

If anything Christianity opposes everything BUT Jews. The Bible might have some passages here and there that you can interpret as being against Jews, but the actions of the religion speak louder than words.

The New Testament and Jesus is Christianity, nothing else. without those two things there is no Christianity. Without the belief in Jesus, there is no Christianity. Without the New Covenant there is no Christianity.
The life and death of Jesus is Christianity.
If you don't believe in Jesus you aren't Christian.
If you don't believe in the new Testament you aren't Christian.
Jesus gave his followers one mission and that is to spread the gospels of Jesus, his life and death.

>>520473065
See
>>520472091

But for an additional comment on your specific post:

Jesus repeatedly mentions facts in the Old Testament. Jesus also states that all the laws in the Old Testament are still valid to this day.

Christianity is the Old and New Testament. There is no way around it.

Jesus said, “Do not think that I have come to abolish the Law or the Prophets; I have not come to abolish them but to fulfill them. For truly I tell you, until heaven and earth disappear, not the smallest letter, not the least stroke of a pen, will by any means disappear from the Law until everything is accomplished” (Matthew 5:17–18).

>>520473269
Through his death and resurrection. Jesus fulfilled the old covenant and gave a new one.

>38 “You have heard that it was said, ‘Eye for eye, and tooth for tooth.’[a] 39 But I tell you, do not resist an evil person. If anyone slaps you on the right cheek, turn to them the other cheek also. 40 And if anyone wants to sue you and take your shirt, hand over your coat as well. 41 If anyone forces you to go one mile, go with them two miles. 42 Give to the one who asks you, and do not turn away from the one who wants to borrow from you.
Love for Enemies

>43 “You have heard that it was said, ‘Love your neighbor[b] and hate your enemy.’ 44 But I tell you, love your enemies and pray for those who persecute you, 45 that you may be children of your Father in heaven. He causes his sun to rise on the evil and the good, and sends rain on the righteous and the unrighteous. 46 If you love those who love you, what reward will you get? Are not even the tax collectors doing that? 47 And if you greet only your own people, what are you doing more than others? Do not even pagans do that? 48 Be perfect, therefore, as your heavenly Father is perfect.

Jesus gave you examplea of the old and new.

That meeting was a bunch of no-name retards, completely out of touch with normal people (the majority of people on earth)

>>520471304
Some of those idiots are in it because their minds are captured by that perverse manufactured branch of christianity

>>520471043
Jesus never said he needs to be worshipped. and his project wasn't about codified / ornamental worshipping it was about liberation

>>520473432

Jesus explicitly stated that the old Laws will remain until Heaven and Earth disappear.

You are just completely wrong and the verses you cited have nothing to do with the validity of the Law.

Honestly, Jesus made this so explicitly clear that even denying this is practically heresy.

The problem, in a nutshell, is this:

>Christianity defines jews wrong. Thereby precluding solving the problem they present.

First, let's look at this from the christian perspective. Christianity does not place any value on race. None whatsoever. Absolutely nothing. Rather, it values individuals. No matter their station, race, ethnic group, location in the world (or universe, one assumes). Christianity is about the individual soul. And the cult has the One True Way. All men must go through Jesus to reach heaven, otherwise they are doomed. All that matters is whether a man has been converted and saved. So jews, being arguably human, have no different status from any other group of men. They are jewish individuals. They require conversion to xtianity, same as any random Zulu, Guatemalan or Iowan. The church's job is to love jews and evangelize them with the good news about Saver Jesus, and win them over to the church. For 2000 years the church has attempted this, and its record in converting jews is one of complete failure. Very few jews have ever converted or been tempted to. For the obvious reasons that: 1) xtianity isn't true, its central claim (jews know this because a) they are intelligent genetically; b) they invented xtianity); 2) they get a lot more practical benefits out of their own 'religion'; 3) they prefer being with their own kind, and that means race, and that means their fellow Ashkenazis. 4) There's a negative carrot too - as we will hear today in the unabridged The International Jew, Ch. 15, regarding the excommunication and execration and cursing of Spinoza for leaving the hate group called jews. They get socially and otherwise punished extremely viciously for cutting with their own race.

Jews wrote the xtian books attributed to God. Which right there shows you the feebleness of the xtian mentality, their bent toward seeing jews as worthy people rather than adversaries, and their general mindset of hagridden otherworldliness. Yet xtians paid no attention to jews until a rare jew convert brought to the Pope's attention the crazy stuff written against jesus in the Talmud. The xtians responded by developing a policy called Sicut Judaeis Non. Very few xtians have heard of this. They will look at you blankly if you mention it. SJN says the church must love jews as individuals, but it is ok to prevent them from messing up xtian culture. It is wrong, however, to kill them or use force to get them to convert. Sounds great, doesn't it? Very tolerant and fair. In reality it amounts to this: the xtian defenders have to win every time; the jew subverters only have to win once. This battle has been going on for hundreds of years. Guess who won? The only reason the jews didn't win in ten years rather than 1000 was the existence of the internet. For proof, consider they were able to move xtian publics from hostility to support for homosex deviants in roughly one decade, purely through electronic and government-school propaganda.

Jews now dominate all white lands. All xtian cultures have been poisoned by jewish crank ideas like liberalism, tolerance and sexual liberation. Whites suffer from this. Jews were kicked out of various countries 109 times, if the numbers are correct. Yet they were readmitted 110 - and that is what matters. Fools fooled with jews, and the jews ended up eating the fools. That's where we are now. Jews standing on top of our countries, standing on their necks. Filling the white heartlands in Germany and America with Syrians and Mexicans.

(more)

https://www.alexlinder.com/orig-2015-11-3-christianity-defines-jews-wrong.html

>>520473664
Jesus gave you examples of the old covenant and new covenant
But you wont listen.
He fulfilled the old covenant, as you stated.
What do you think fulfilled means? It means he finished it, or completed it.

>>520473894
> What do you think fulfilled means?

>> For truly I tell you, until heaven and earth disappear, not the smallest letter, not the least stroke of a pen, will by any means disappear from the Law until everything is accomplished.

The Old Testament Laws are fulfilled when the Apocalypse happens.

>>520474051
>3 For they being ignorant of God's righteousness, and going about to establish their own righteousness, have not submitted themselves unto the righteousness of God.
>4 For Christ is the end of the law for righteousness to every one that believeth.

>4 For Christ is the end of the law for righteousness to every one that believeth.
>4 For Christ is the end of the law for righteousness to every one that believeth.

>5 For Moses describeth the righteousness which is of the law, That the man which doeth those things shall live by them.
>6 But the righteousness which is of faith speaketh on this wise, Say not in thine heart, Who shall ascend into heaven? (that is, to bring Christ down from above:)
>7 Or, Who shall descend into the deep? (that is, to bring up Christ again from the dead.)
>8 But what saith it? The word is nigh thee, even in thy mouth, and in thy heart: that is, the word of faith, which we preach;

>9 That if thou shalt confess with thy mouth the Lord Jesus, and shalt believe in thine heart that God hath raised him from the dead, thou shalt be saved.
>9 That if thou shalt confess with thy mouth the Lord Jesus, and shalt believe in thine heart that God hath raised him from the dead, thou shalt be saved.

>10 For with the heart man believeth unto righteousness; and with the mouth confession is made unto salvation.
>11 For the scripture saith, Whosoever believeth on him shall not be ashamed.
>12 For there is no difference between the Jew and the Greek: for the same Lord over all is rich unto all that call upon him.
>13 For whosoever shall call upon the name of the Lord shall be saved.

Jesus is fulfillment of the law. And only through him can you be saved.

>>520474383
>> 4 For Christ is the end of the law for righteousness to every one that believeth.

This does NOT mean the Law is fulfilled. This verse is just saying that Jesus is the last legitimate prophet. Judaism was waiting for the Messiah (last prophet). Christians claim that Jesus is the last prophet. Islam claims Mohammed is the last prophet. Etc.

> >5 For Moses describeth the righteousness which is of the law, That the man which doeth those things shall live by them.

Again, affirming that the Laws of Moses remain valid. These are the most fundamental Laws, the 10 commandments.

Do you believe the 10 commandments are not valid in Christianity? That would be heresy.

The rest is just Christians claiming that you have to worship their specific prophet for protection/salvation.

> Jesus is fulfillment of the law. And only through him can you be saved.
>> For truly I tell you, until heaven and earth disappear, not the smallest letter, not the least stroke of a pen, will by any means disappear from the Law until everything is accomplished.

I think, at this point, you are a heretic. It's pretty obvious what is being said here by anyone who isn't into mental gymnastics to protect whatever Biblical Law breaking they have been doing.

>>520469748 (OP)
I dont care about American Proddies
I am sorry, but I dont,

>>520474737
The old law was fulfilled because it lead people to Jesus, and that was it's purpose, to lead people to Jesus.
Again the law was fulfilled because of Jesus..
The whole point of Jesus was to teach you how to enter the kingdom of heaven, and to save you.

>>520471416
>Jew/jeet detected

>>520472091
Christ is the Son of God. Not some dead jew.
>BCE and not BC
Kys faggot

>>520474934
>> For truly I tell you, until heaven and earth disappear, not the smallest letter, not the least stroke of a pen, will by any means disappear from the Law until everything is accomplished.
>> UNTIL HEAVEN AND EARTH DISAPPEAR

You know when Heaven and Earth will disappear? The Apocalypse.

The law has not been fulfilled. That is cope by Christians who have grown a preference to break the Biblical Law.

Heresy

>>520474737
>1 Stand[a] fast therefore in the liberty by which Christ has made us free, and do not be entangled again with a yoke of bondage.
>2 Indeed I, Paul, say to you that if you become circumcised, Christ will profit you nothing.
>3 And I testify again to every man who becomes circumcised that he is [b]a debtor to keep the whole law.
>4 You have become estranged from Christ, you who attempt to be justified by law; you have fallen from grace.
>5 For we through the Spirit eagerly wait for the hope of righteousness by faith.
>6 For in Christ Jesus neither circumcision nor uncircumcision avails anything, but faith working through love.

>You have become estranged from Christ, you who attempt to be justified by law; you have fallen from grace.
>You have become estranged from Christ, you who attempt to be justified by law; you have fallen from grace.
>You have become estranged from Christ, you who attempt to be justified by law; you have fallen from grace.
>You have become estranged from Christ, you who attempt to be justified by law; you have fallen from grace.

>>520475151
>You have become estranged from Christ, you who attempt to be justified by law; you have fallen from grace.
>You have become estranged from Christ, you who attempt to be justified by law; you have fallen from grace.
>You have become estranged from Christ, you who attempt to be justified by law; you have fallen from grace.
>You have become estranged from Christ, you who attempt to be justified by law; you have fallen from grace.

>>520469748 (OP)
xtianity is second temple judaism + greek philosophy + roman pagan faith

>>520470227
>Thank God this kind of christianity is dying.
You mean all of christianity?

Catholics are the same
Orthodox are the same
They suck the cocks of Israel and foreign invaders

>>520469748 (OP)
>im an evangelical
>but I won’t evangelize

>>520475010
> Christ is the Son of God. Not some dead jew.

"I was sent only to the lost sheep of the house of Israel" (Matthew 15:24)

Jewish practices: He observed Jewish festivals like Passover and the Feast of Tabernacles.
Teaching from the Hebrew Bible: He taught from and fulfilled the Jewish scriptures, which are part of the Christian Bible.
Identity as a Rabbi: He was identified as a rabbi by his followers, a title for a Jewish teacher.
Born and died as a Jew: He was born into a Jewish family and died a Jew, never distancing himself from his Jewish people or their faith.
Messianic claim: He was identified as the Jewish Messiah, and the high priest confronted him with the claim, "I charge You under oath by the living God, tell us if You are the Messiah, the Son of God!" (Matthew 26:63-64).

Jesus claimed to be the Jewish Messiah.

Yes, according to the Gospel of Luke, Jesus was circumcised on the eighth day after his birth, as was the Jewish custom. This event is commemorated in some Christian traditions as the "Feast of the Circumcision," and it also marked the day he was given the name Jesus.

>>520475179
>> 1 Stand[a] fast therefore in the liberty by which Christ has made us free, and do not be entangled again with a yoke of bondage.

Typical religious claims that their god/prophet makes them free of whatever XYZ oppressors.

>> 2 Indeed I, Paul, say to you that if you become circumcised, Christ will profit you nothing.

This just means that circumcision, alone, will not save you. You have to have faith in Christ, doing works means nothing.

Luke 2:21 states that "when eight days were accomplished for the circumcising of the child, his name was called Jesus".

See
>>520475350

>>520475350
>6 For in Christ Jesus neither circumcision nor uncircumcision avails anything, but faith working through love.
Even thought Jesus was circumcised as a baby his coming fulfilled that law.
Circumcision is old law, and doesn't have anything to do with anything today.
Those rituals and sacraments don't really matter, now that Christ has come

>>520475350
Male circumcision was a thing before Jews did it.
Jesus didn't claim to be the Jewish Messiah He claimed to be Jehovah/Yahweh, the Son of Man.

>>520475479
Again Baby Jesus was circumcised under OLD LAW
which was fulfilled
as Paul said
>>6 For in Christ Jesus neither circumcision nor uncircumcision avails anything, but faith working through love.

>>520475565
it was old laws that Jesus fulfilled which Paul said it didn't matter

>>520475716
They still matter. Jesus didn't chuck away the OT. He IS the God of the OT (Jehovah).

>>520469748 (OP)
If Jesus is Gods fulfillment to the promise made to Abraham then wouldn’t that make Judaism the byproduct of Christianity?

>>520469748 (OP)
Do not fall for glownigger divide & conquer tactics.

Christianity is the definition of "right wing" political ideology:
- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Left%E2%80%93right_political_spectrum#Origins_in_the_French_Revolution

Christianity has always been a racist religion:
>"Oh, race of Franks, race from across the mountains, race chosen and beloved [...]"
>"the kingdom of the Persians, an accursed race, a race utterly alienated from God [...]"
- https://www2.cbn.com/article/church/pope-urban-iis-speech-calling-first-crusade

The racist and anti-semitic Confederates have always been Christian.
The National Socialists used the Celtic cross and gave out iron cross medals for bravery. The white term for "swastika" is hakenkreuz, meaning hooked cross.
- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hakenkreuzbanner

Here's a growing list of Christian political commentators who are racist and anti-semitic:
- https://rentry.org/Deus_Vult
Feel free to reply to this post with others.

Educate boomers irl. If you don't preach to them, the anti-Christian kikes will:
- https://news.antiwar.com/2025/10/06/israel-to-spend-up-to-4-1-million-in-propaganda-campaign-targeting-american-christians/
israeli nationalism ("zionism") is a heresy:
- https://youtu.be/GKlT-hhZXoM&t=658s
- https://youtu.be/odNoExd8a5U
- https://youtu.be/rp92-3aBL-A
The "holocaust" (burnt offering) is a lie made up by kikes, both soviet and freemason:
- https://rumble.com/c/ScriptureandTraditionFrJM/videos
Boycott israeli products:
- https://bdsmovement.net

Common glownigger talking points:
>"jesus is a kike"
The word "kike" comes from "kikel", which means circle. The kikes hate the cross so much, they would sign documents with a circle, hence the nickname.
- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Plus_and_minus_signs#Alternative_plus_sign
>"off topic"
Reminder the pope is the monarch of a country. In fact in many white nations there is no separation between church and state.

>>520475563
Jesus addressed circumcision by stating that while he did not come to abolish the Law, a physical act like circumcision was less important than the spiritual change of the heart. He argued with the Pharisees about healing a man on the Sabbath, explaining that making him whole was more important than observing the Sabbath rule, just as circumcision was given by the patriarchs before Moses and was tied to faith. Later apostles, particularly Paul, clarified that neither physical circumcision nor uncircumcision is necessary for salvation, emphasizing instead that faith working through love is what matters.

Jesus coming did NOT fulfill the Law.

Jesus explicitly stated that the Law is fulfilled when the Apocalypse happens.

You are going to have to explain why he said this:

> “Do not think that I have come to abolish the Law or the Prophets; I have not come to abolish them but to fulfill them. For truly I tell you, until heaven and earth disappear, not the smallest letter, not the least stroke of a pen, will by any means disappear from the Law until everything is accomplished” (Matthew 5:17–18).

> UNTIL HEAVEN AND EARTH DISAPPEAR

Try explaining that without omitting text or inserting heretical bullshit.

>>520475565
> Male circumcision was a thing before Jews did it.

So? It was still tied to Jewish faith and used by Jews both as identifiers and a sign of domination over enemies. Yahweh himself demanded circumcision on multiple occasions.

> Jesus didn't claim to be the Jewish Messiah He claimed to be Jehovah/Yahweh, the Son of Man.

The Gospels report that Jesus claimed to be the Jewish Messiah, identifying himself with Messianic prophecies through direct statements and actions. For example, in John 4:25-26, he tells the Samaritan woman, "I who speak to you am he," in response to her statement about the coming Messiah. He also declared that a prophetic passage in Isaiah 61 was fulfilled "in your hearing", a statement claiming to be the Messiah.

>>520475633
Paul is just saying that circumcision alone will not save you.

>>520475786
Adam, Moses, Abraham, Noah, etc all had faith in Christ. Yes you're getting it Christ is the God of the OT and existed before all other religions. Every time you read "the Lord" or "Lord God" in the Bible that's Jesus.

>>520475762
Also, Commandments aren't laws.
JESUS FULFILLED THE OLD MOSAIC LAWS
They were useful to bring people to Jesus and that's it.
Now that Jesus has come the Old Laws are fulfilled.
Just like how baby dick cutting has nothing to do with the new testament, or salvation.

>>520475904
He saying that it doesn't matter.
Since Jesus fulfilled those laws and if you are doing it to keep the law, You have become estranged from Christ. Like you are.
>3 And I testify again to every man who becomes circumcised that he is [b]a debtor to keep the whole law.
>4 You have become estranged from Christ, you who attempt to be justified by law; you have fallen from grace.
>5 For we through the Spirit eagerly wait for the hope of righteousness by faith.
>6 For in Christ Jesus neither circumcision nor uncircumcision avails anything, but faith working through love.

>>520476036
> “Do not think that I have come to abolish the Law or the Prophets; I have not come to abolish them but to fulfill them. For truly I tell you, until heaven and earth disappear, not the smallest letter, not the least stroke of a pen, will by any means disappear from the Law until everything is accomplished” (Matthew 5:17–18).

> UNTIL HEAVEN AND EARTH DISAPPEAR

Try explaining that without omitting text or inserting heretical bullshit.

>>520475943
Cope. The OT still stands.

>>520472091
>BCE

Kike identified

>>520475850
Jesus told you that he fulfilled those old mosaic laws. Which severed their purpose of bring people to him. Those laws didn't go away, they were fulfilled by Jesus.
Those mosaic laws, such as an eye for and eye, and love they neighbor.
Commandment aren't laws.

>>520476087
The old testament stand but the mosaic laws have have been fulfilled by Jesus.
The Old testament fulfilled its purposes bring people to Jesus.

>>520476084
The Bible says heaven and earth will pass away at an event described as the "Day of the Lord," though the exact timing is not specified beyond its connection to Jesus' second coming and the end times. In Matthew 24:35, Jesus states, "Heaven and earth will pass away, but my words will never pass away". This verse is echoed in other scriptures like Mark 13:31 and Luke 21:33.

Matthew 24:35: "Heaven and earth will pass away, but my words will never pass away".

2 Peter 3:10: Describes the Day of the Lord as the time when "the heavens will be destroyed with a fiery blast, and the elements will be dissolved with intense heat".

Revelation 21:1: Mentions that "the first heaven and the first earth had passed away" before a new heaven and a new earth were created.

>>520470288
Your statement is in direct opposition of reality.

>>520476157
Fulfilled just means he followed the Law. He explicitly says the Laws remain valid until Heaven and Earth disappear.

> “Do not think that I have come to abolish the Law or the Prophets; I have not come to abolish them but to fulfill them. For truly I tell you, until heaven and earth disappear, not the smallest letter, not the least stroke of a pen, will by any means disappear from the Law until everything is accomplished” (Matthew 5:17–18).

> UNTIL HEAVEN AND EARTH DISAPPEAR

Try explaining that without omitting text or inserting heretical bullshit.

>>520475786
Judaism emerged after Christianity as an antichrist satanist sect, so yes.

>>520476275
The coming of Jesus fulfilled the old, and Jesus brought in the new.
Jesus established a NEW covenant.
Its not that hard to understand.

>>520476137
Retard identified.

Before Common Era is just a term used to describe when a common point in time without having to imply religious affiliation to Christcuckery.

>>520476212
Just because Christ fulfilled them doesn't mean they're irrelevant today. He's the one who wrote the law.

>>520476352
You keep repeating this but Jesus explicitely said:

> “Do not think that I have come to abolish the Law or the Prophets; I have not come to abolish them but to fulfill them. For truly I tell you, until heaven and earth disappear, not the smallest letter, not the least stroke of a pen, will by any means disappear from the Law until everything is accomplished” (Matthew 5:17–18).

> UNTIL HEAVEN AND EARTH DISAPPEAR

Try explaining that without omitting text or inserting heretical bullshit.

Here's what Jesus meant by the Heaven and Earth disappearing:

The Bible says heaven and earth will pass away at an event described as the "Day of the Lord," though the exact timing is not specified beyond its connection to Jesus' second coming and the end times. In Matthew 24:35, Jesus states, "Heaven and earth will pass away, but my words will never pass away". This verse is echoed in other scriptures like Mark 13:31 and Luke 21:33.

Matthew 24:35: "Heaven and earth will pass away, but my words will never pass away".

2 Peter 3:10: Describes the Day of the Lord as the time when "the heavens will be destroyed with a fiery blast, and the elements will be dissolved with intense heat".

Revelation 21:1: Mentions that "the first heaven and the first earth had passed away" before a new heaven and a new earth were created.

>>520476381
>Jew/jeet/athiest detected
Only science worshipping and God denying faggots use BCE/CE

>>520476388
Their purpose was to bring people to Jesus and the were fulfilled by his coming.
Jesus established the New Covenant through His life, death, and resurrection.

>>520476429
He didn't abolish them he fulfilled them.
Their purpose was to bring people to Jesus and the were fulfilled by his coming.
Jesus established the New Covenant through His life, death, and resurrection.

>>520476438
I'm an atheist. I will use BCE/CE. I'm not going to worship your dead Jew on a stick.

Yahweh is a false god.

>>520476477
WRONG

Fulfilled just means followed the law. The laws are still valid, hence he did not abolish them and he explicitly told you when they would be abolished:

> > “Do not think that I have come to abolish the Law or the Prophets; I have not come to abolish them but to fulfill them. For truly I tell you, until heaven and earth disappear, not the smallest letter, not the least stroke of a pen, will by any means disappear from the Law until everything is accomplished” (Matthew 5:17–18).

> For truly I tell you, until heaven and earth disappear, not the smallest letter, not the least stroke of a pen, will by any means disappear from the Law until everything is accomplished

>>520476499
>I'm an atheist. I will use BCE/CE
Yeah because you're a faggot
>Jesus was just some dead jew
Shut up faggot. He's the Son of God.

>>520476571
Lol. Your God got killed with pointy sticks.

GAY

>>520469748 (OP)
No lies detected

>>520476443
Just because a new covenant was added doesn't mean the old ones are gone.

>>520475762
> Jesus said unto them, Verily, verily, I say unto you, Before Abraham was, I am.

>>520476744
Then He resurrected to shit on every gaytheist and Christ hater like yourself to prove He's the Son of Man.
You mad?

>>520476819
Based.
Finally an anon here gets it.

>>520469748 (OP)
We ought to try to normalise referring to any U.S. or western politician as a “zionist senator” for example, rather than “republican senator”.

If they have loyalty to that foreign people then they’re not American and don’t represent American parties.

>>520476550
>>520476783
The purpose of Old Testament was to serve as a witness to God's plan for the coming of Jesus.

>>520476571
The Egyptian Shasu people worshipped Yahu. They moved to present day Israel in Canaan and adopted one of the Canaanite languages, Hebrew, and turned Yahu into Yahweh and fused Yahweh into the Canaanite pantheon.

Before 400 BCE, Jews did not know any Biblical stories, as evidenced by the Elephantine Papyri. Those were not fabricated until around 400 BCE due to various political conflicts where Jews repeatedly rewrite Yahweh to become increasingly monotheistic by melding the characteristics of the other Canaanites gods into Yahweh and even giving Yahweh a wife, Asherah, which used to be the wife of the Most High Canaanite god, El.

The oldest Biblical scriptures still mention Yahweh's Canaanite origins:

Dead Sea Scrolls - Deuteronomy 32:8-9: “When Elyon gave the nations as an inheritance, when he separated the sons of man, he set the boundaries of the peoples according to the number of the sons of God (bene elohim). For Yahweh’s portion was his people; Jacob was the lot of his inheritance”.

Modern Bibles still mention some Canaanite stories, such as when Yahweh and his Jews lost a war to Yahweh's brother god, Chemosh, worshipped by the Moabites in 2 Kings 3. The Moabites also recorded this story in their own scriptures in the Mesha Stele because Yahweh, Chemosh, and all other Canaanite gods once belonged to the same pantheon.

Also, see
>>520472091

>>520476858
LOL

> Muh god died for you
> Gotcha
> He resurrected himself, he didn't actually die or fear death
> He just pretended to die/kill himself to absolve us of sin or something

Highly retarded story.

In actuality, Jesus killed himself because it was Jewish tradition to use human sacrifice, especially sacrificing first born sons, to appease their gods. In this case, Yahweh. Nothing more. It was all about gaining political/religious clout among the Jews.

Jesus fulfilled the Old Testament law.
Jesus was the final perfect sacrifice for the forgiveness of sins
The new covenant provides a way to be made right with God through faith in Him, rather than through the Old Testament rituals of blood sacrifice and ceremonial cleanness.
If we where to being going by the old testament we would still be doing blood sacrifice.

The Old Testament law has been fulfilled. Its that simple.
Or you would still be doing blood sacrifices, like the jews.

>>520477030
Yes but that doesn't mean the laws that were given out are obsolete now. Christ IS the law..He is Jehovah.

>>520477210
>>520477253

You keep repeating this but Jesus explicitely said:

> “Do not think that I have come to abolish the Law or the Prophets; I have not come to abolish them but to fulfill them. For truly I tell you, until heaven and earth disappear, not the smallest letter, not the least stroke of a pen, will by any means disappear from the Law until everything is accomplished” (Matthew 5:17–18).

> UNTIL HEAVEN AND EARTH DISAPPEAR

Try explaining that without omitting text or inserting heretical bullshit.

Here's what Jesus meant by the Heaven and Earth disappearing:

The Bible says heaven and earth will pass away at an event described as the "Day of the Lord," though the exact timing is not specified beyond its connection to Jesus' second coming and the end times. In Matthew 24:35, Jesus states, "Heaven and earth will pass away, but my words will never pass away". This verse is echoed in other scriptures like Mark 13:31 and Luke 21:33.

Matthew 24:35: "Heaven and earth will pass away, but my words will never pass away".

2 Peter 3:10: Describes the Day of the Lord as the time when "the heavens will be destroyed with a fiery blast, and the elements will be dissolved with intense heat".

Revelation 21:1: Mentions that "the first heaven and the first earth had passed away" before a new heaven and a new earth were created.

>>520477162
Jesus is Yahweh/Jehovah. He wasnt sacrificing Himself to Himself. He was chosen by Elohim to create and save Earth.

>>520477358
If we were to being going by the old testament we would still be doing blood sacrifice.
But we aren't.
Jesus fulfilled the old laws.

>>520470288
Why did christians then stop the persecution of jews in Rome?

>>520477333
It's Yahweh, not Jehovah. The name "Jehovah" was invented in the 1600s as an English mistranslation.

>>520477333
>>520477358
explain why we don't do blood sacrifices anymore if Jesus didn't make that OLD LAW obsolete?
you cant because JESUS FULFILLED THOSE LAWS

>>520470793
That is funny. You have a literal nigger that kisses ice cubes running your heresy, which also says that Protestants (and Jews and Muslims) are your fellow Christians.

>>520473269
Look up what "fulfill" means. It doesn't mean continue.

>>520477503
Means the same thing though

>>520477542
Sacrifices happen all the time. Crazy shit goes on in the world still. Nothing has changed.

>>520469748 (OP)
Not even hundred years ago all Christians would have laughed at him for saying stupid shit like that.
Five hundred years ago he would have been stabbed and thrown into a ditch for saying stupid shit like this.
Christianity needs to go back to its roots.

>>520477600
that's what I thought fuck face.
the old testament's salvation, the old testament law, was based on blood sacrifices and other bullshit.
which we don't do anymore because
JESUS FULFILLED THOSE LAWS

>>520475904
Thanks for outing yourself, Baumstein. Titus 3:5 says no works save you: Jesus' mercy washes you with His one work on the cross, in your place, the moment you accept the claims He made about Himself:
>John 11:25-26
"I am the resurrection and the life: he that believeth in me, though he were dead, yet shall he live. And whosoever liveth and believeth in me shall never die. BELIEVEST thou THIS?"

>>520477395
Jesus repeatedly makes it clear that he is NOT Yahweh. Jesus even prayed to Yahweh. Was Yahweh praying to himself? Retarded.

>>520477417
Jesus only implied that he killed himself (sacrificed himself0 to forgive sins, not that blood sacrifices were not to be done. Yahweh LOVES blood sacrifices and demands it over and over again, sometimes killing humans, especially children and especially first born sons. Yahweh sometimes says that if you don't want to sacrifice a child, you have to pay a tax to the church. Back then children were the social safety net and labour, so people were highly incentivized to pay the tax to the church to spare their child.

Jews didn't value children as humans, not regarding them as having souls for many years, and practiced abortions.

>>520477692
????
That shit still goes on around the world people do all kinds of sacrificial things. Nothing has changed since the fall. Humans are exactly the same.

>>520477590
> “Do not think that I have come to abolish the Law or the Prophets; I have not come to abolish them but to fulfill them. For truly I tell you, until heaven and earth disappear, not the smallest letter, not the least stroke of a pen, will by any means disappear from the Law until everything is accomplished” (Matthew 5:17–18).

> UNTIL HEAVEN AND EARTH DISAPPEAR

Try explaining that without omitting text or inserting heretical bullshit.

>>520477777
Christ claimed to be Yahweh/Jehovah many times ala subtly but He did.
And Christ only prayed to the Father, not Himself.

>>520477755
I'm an atheist, I have no Jewish heritage what-so-ever. I'm not sure what you think your gotcha is, I just reiterated a very non-controversial statement by Paul from the Bible.

>>520477777
checked
....
the old testament's salvation, the old testament law, was based on blood sacrifices and other bullshit
which we don't do anymore because
JESUS FULFILLED THOSE LAWS
its that simple
are you saying we should start doing blood sacrifices again because its on the old testament?
no we should because....... wait for it.....
JESUS FILLED THOSE OLD MOSAIC LAWS

>>520477648
>Christianity needs to go back to its roots
but that's Judaism

>>520475917
Yep, amen.
>Exodus 3:2, 3:6
"And THE ANGEL of the LORD appeared unto him in a flame of fire out of the midst of a bush: and he looked, and, behold, the bush burned with fire, and the bush was not consumed...he (THE ANGEL) said, I am the God of thy father, the God of Abraham, the God of Isaac, and the God of Jacob. And Moses hid his face; for he was afraid to look upon GOD.
>Exodus 23:23
"For mine Angel shall go before thee, and bring thee in unto the Amorites, and the Hittites, and the Perizzites, and the Canaanites, and the Hivites, and the Jebusites: and I will cut them off."
>Acts 7:45 KJV (literally translated from the Greek)
"Which also our fathers that came after brought in with JESUS into the possession of the Gentiles, whom God drave out before the face of our fathers, unto the days of David"

>>520477951
Faggot.
No religion on Earth is older than Christ.

>>520477837
again
blood sacrifices.
we, Christians, don't do them for salvation
because of Jesus
He fulfilled that bullshit.

>>520477941
>I twisted a statement by Paul from the Bible using my anti-Christian confirmation bias
FTFY, and Titus 3:5 still corrects you. Also, you're going to Hell for your wrongdoings, which is why you shouldn't reject the one Sacrifice who can save you the moment you trust in Him.

>>520477894
> ala subtly
In other words, it's bullshit interpretation.

Meanwhile Jesus says:

Verses showing Jesus' distinction from the Father:
John 5:30: "I can do nothing on my own. I judge as I hear, and my judgment is just, for I seek to do the will of him who sent me." This verse highlights Jesus' submission to the Father's will and the source of his authority.
John 14:28: "You heard me say to you, ‘I am going away, and I will come to you.’ If you loved me, you would have rejoiced, because I am going to the Father, for the Father is greater than I." This is often cited to show a difference in rank or authority between the Father and the Son.
John 17:3: "And this is eternal life, that they know you the only true God, and Jesus Christ whom you have sent." This verse presents God the Father as the "only true God" and positions Jesus as the one whom the Father sent.
John 6:38: "For I have come down from heaven, not to do my own will, but the will of him who sent me." This verse emphasizes that Jesus' purpose was to fulfill the Father's will, not his own.

Verses reflecting a temporary separation on the cross:
Matthew 27:46: "And about the ninth hour Jesus cried out with a loud voice, saying, 'Eli, Eli, lema sabachthani?' that is, 'My God, my God, why have you forsaken me?'" This cry is understood by many to be the human Jesus experiencing the agony of separation from God the Father as he bore the sin of the world.
2 Corinthians 5:21: "For he made him who knew no sin to be sin for us, so that in him we might become the righteousness of God." This verse supports the idea that Jesus, as the sin-bearer, was temporarily treated as if he were sinful, which in a spiritual sense means separation from God.

>>520477866
Tell me what "fulfill" means, Baumstein.

>>520469748 (OP)
Christcucks will defend this.

>>520477777
>Was Yahweh praying to himself?
Yes, but the Son and the Father are not the same person despite sharing the same essence of being God. If the Son was praying to the Son, your gotcha would work.

>>520471043
>Jews cannot be God's chosen people, it is impossible.
Romans 11 clarifies this. They were/are God's chosen people because of the promise to Abraham, but since most rejected Christ, the offer got extended to everyone else too. A modern comparison would be a company party where fewer people showed up than anticipated so they gave plates of food out to whoever wanted some near the venue. The company staff was the chosen group, but because they didn't show up non-employees got to enjoy it too.

>>520477648
The roots in question:

>>520478051
>Faggot
nigger you're the one getting on his knees to pray and profess your love to an effeminate kike pacifist in a dress. Eww.

>>520477950
> are you saying we should start doing blood sacrifices again because its on the old testament?

Yes, real Christians will continue human sacrifices to Yahweh. Jesus sacrifice is a human sacrifice.

Just because Christians are weak and degenerate does not mean the explicit text suddenly changes meaning. It just means Christians picked and chose what they wanted to believe.

I'm not saying Christians or anyone should be doing human sacrifices, just that the text is very plainly and obviously saying you should.

>>520478161
Only the ones who don't know the new testament and Jesus.
Jesus gave his followers one mission, to spread his message throughout the world

>>520475337
Shameful creep (and could just be a wolf in sheep's clothing), but Peter preceded him and was rebuked for it by Paul: see Galatian 2.

>>520478297
All paganism is corrupted oral retellings of pre-Flood history, the Tower of Babel, and sometimes also (as Ninigi's arc of the Shinto Kojiki attests) parts of the Old Testament. Seethe.

>>520478121
> “Do not think that I have come to abolish the Law or the Prophets; I have not come to abolish them but to fulfill them. For truly I tell you, until heaven and earth disappear, not the smallest letter, not the least stroke of a pen, will by any means disappear from the Law until everything is accomplished” (Matthew 5:17–18).

> UNTIL HEAVEN AND EARTH DISAPPEAR

According to Jesus, "fulfill" does NOT mean abolish, and it does NOT mean the Law should not be enforced/followed. Why? Because:

> For truly I tell you, until heaven and earth disappear, not the smallest letter, not the least stroke of a pen, will by any means disappear from the Law until everything is accomplished” (Matthew 5:17–18).

Try explaining that without omitting text or inserting heretical bullshit.

>>520478256
See
>>520478111

>>520478111
Not all of it was subtle. I misspoke. In Revelation He straight up says I am the first and the last the Alpha and the Omega. How do you interpret that? How do you interpret Him saying He existed before the prophets? He was either schizo or the Son of God. (The resurrection proved the latter).

>>520477777
>Jesus only implied that he killed himself (sacrificed himself0 to forgive sins, not that blood sacrifices were not to be done)
This is really embarrassing for you: Hebrews 9:22 - "And almost all things are by the law purged with blood; and without shedding of blood is no remission."
>Yahweh sometimes says that if you don't want to sacrifice a child, you have to pay a tax to the church. Back then children were the social safety net and labour, so people were highly incentivized to pay the tax to the church to spare their child.
Whatever misquote this is (if it's not just ad-hoc garbage you're making up on the fly) may be worse than the Devil's in the wilderness. Post nose, Baumstein.

>>520478312
Well, True Christians believe Jesus fulfilled the old testament through his death and resurrection.
This is why we, Christians, don't go around murdering animals in the name of God, like in the old testament.
But if you believe that you need to murder animals to please your God, go ahead.

>>520478463
Fulfill means complete (as (((You))) already know), not abolish nor continue. Jesus completed the Law on the cross, hence His words in John 19:30 - "It is FINISHED."

>>520478455
Imagine being a schizo AND a kike worshipper who can only see the world through a jew centered lense. The noah tale isn't even original my poor little midwit

>>520478706
>hence His words in John 19:30 - "It is FINISHED."
Funny because Matthew and Mark his last words are "My God, my God, why have you forsaken me?" And Luke it's "Father, into Your hands I commend my spirit."

Kek

>>520478111
>let me tell you what these verses using my personal confirmation bias
Jesus says "My disciples are greater than I" in Luke 22:27 - how can Jesus be less than His own followers, genius?

A few verses where Jesus is clearly called God:
>John 8:58
"Before Abraham was, I am."
>1 Timothy 3:16
"God was manifest in the flesh"
>Genesis 1:26
"And God said, Let us make man in our image"
>Revelation 1:8
"I am...the Almighty."

>>520478514
According to the Bible, modern Yahweh created the angels before he created the universe and Earth. Jesus and Satan were two of those angels.

Much of these accounts comes from old Canaanite mythology, with the Most High god El creating the universe. Describing how El's word created the Earth, how El shaped creatures from clay, and how some gods he created separated the Earth from the Heavens etc. Generally described as creating it in the same way as the Bible describes. But later on, due to political conflicts, Yahweh was rewritten not to be a son of El, but to be the only god and having all the characteristics of the other Canaanite gods, such as El, Baal, etc.

The Bible still retains many of they polytheistic texts in Genesis but placing Yahweh where El once was.

Genesis 1:26: "Then God said, 'Let us make mankind in our image, in our likeness...'" The use of "us" and "our" has led some scholars to see an allusion to a polytheistic conception of deity or a divine council (an assembly of gods).

Genesis 3:22: "And the Lord God said, 'The man has now become like one of us, knowing good and evil...'" This verse, like 1:26, uses the plural "us," which some interpret as a reference to a class of divine beings.

Genesis 11:7: When discussing the Tower of Babel, God says, "Come, let us go down and confuse their language so they will not understand each other". The use of "us" here again suggests a plurality of divine figures or the divine council.

The Bible also describes Yahweh and his Jews losing a war to Yahweh's brother god, Chemosh, in 2 Kings 3. This story is also accounted by the Moabites in the Mesha Stele, because all Canaanite nations once shared the same pantheon.

>>520470432
Orthodox Church

>>520478944
Kek, only Luke spoke of Jesus' last words:
"And when Jesus had cried with a loud voice, he said, Father, into thy hands I commend my spirit: and having said THUS, he gave up the ghost."

Matthew, Mark, nor John say that the phrases you quoted immediately preceded His giving up of the ghost. Seethe.

>>520469748 (OP)
He's gonna blow out his fucking jaw taking that much cock.

You're only flesh and blood, dumb fuck.

>>520469748 (OP)
Why the reps want to lose this fucking hard?

>>520478953
>>1 Timothy 3:16
>"God was manifest in the flesh"
Which version says this?

>>520479002
The use of "us" in reference to the God of the Old Testament proves the Trinity. Jesus says He always existed in John 8:58, was called your Creator in John 1:3, and was said to not be an angel (as in your divine counsel fanfic) in Hebrews 1:5.

>>520479070
>Matthew, Mark
This is the first of the "seven last words" and is recorded in Matthew (using "Eli") and Mark (using "Eloi").

You're not helping your argument lol

>>520479204
>The use of "us" in reference to the God of the Old Testament proves the Trinity
Not it doesn't. It's speculation at best

>>520479192
The KJV, which uses the majority of manuscripts, independently copied in regions not politically connected with one another. A few manuscripts in error (probably affected by Arian bias, being from massively-heretical Alexandria) change "God" to "Who", there.

>>520469748 (OP)
Reminder that the Scofield bible was literally funded by the Lotus club Zionists and then further edited by Zionists at Oxford Publishing House (run by Walter Rothschilds, essentially the founding father of British Zionism) after Scofield's death to push a Zionist agenda and put even more Jew worshipping shit in there.

>>520479070
>>520479277
In both the Gospel of Matthew and Mark, Jesus's last recorded words are "My God, my God, why have you forsaken me?". Matthew records the Aramaic version "Eli, Eli, lema sabachthani," while Mark records the similar "Eloi, Eloi, lema sabachthani," both meaning the same thing.

Matthew 27:46: "Eli, Eli, lema sabachthani? which means, 'My God, my God, why have you forsaken me?'"

Mark 15:34: "Eloi, Eloi, lema sabachthani? which means, 'My God, my God, why have you forsaken me?'"

>>520479277
Then show us where it says "seven last words" in Matthew and Mark. Where does it say in either of them, as it does with the respective words in Luke, that He immediately died after saying these words?

>>520479316
>The KJV
Funny because no other versions say that, including the Greek translation

>>520469748 (OP)
I hope he got his $7000 Israeli payout like a good suit prostitute otherwise its just beyond sad

>>520478643
Hebrews 9:22 states, "Indeed, under the law almost everything is purified with blood, and without the shedding of blood there is no forgiveness of sins". This verse explains that in the Old Testament system, the shedding of blood through animal sacrifice was required for the cleansing and forgiveness of sins, establishing a foundation for the Christian belief that Jesus' death was a necessary sacrifice for the remission of sins. The phrase "without the shedding of blood is no remission" highlights that forgiveness was not granted without a price being paid, a principle extended in the New Testament to Christ's sacrifice.

>>520479371
See above dummy

>>520479359
See
>>520479070

>>520479414
Cite the verses. Where do Matthew or Mark say (as Luke says) "And having said THUS, he gave up the ghost"?

>>520479400
Yes, Einstein, thank you for accepting my correction of your lie earlier.

>>520479454
You're not refuting anything bro
>>520479510
>Where do Matthew or Mark say (as Luke says) "
I never Saif Matthew and Mark say what Luke says. The fuck are you even talking about you moron

>>520479566
>Saif
Said*

>>520479204
The use of "us" comes from Canaanite mythology where El and some of his children formed the universe, Earth, humans, etc.

In the Bible, this was changed to Yahweh creating everything with his angels.

While the Bible does not explicitly state when Satan was created, it implies his existence before the earth's creation and his subsequent fall from heaven. Passages in Isaiah 14, Ezekiel 28, and Revelation 12 describe Satan as a powerful angel, a cherub, who was cast down to earth after a rebellion in heaven, which appears to have occurred before humanity's creation.

Job 38:4-7: "Where were you when I laid the foundation of the earth? ... when the morning stars sang together and all the sons of God shouted for joy?"

This passage is often cited to show that angels (or the children of El, the Canaanite Most High god) were present to witness the creation of the earth, which occurred after their own creation.

>>520479383
Over 5,000 Greek manuscripts of 1 Timothy 3:16 say "God (Theos)", while only around 3 say "Who (Os)". Read it and weep.
"καὶ ὁμολογουμένως μέγα ἐστὶν τὸ τῆς εὐσεβείας μυστήριον· Θεὸς ἐφανερώθη ἐν σαρκί ἐδικαιώθη ἐν πνεύματι ὤφθη ἀγγέλοις ἐκηρύχθη ἐν ἔθνεσιν ἐπιστεύθη ἐν κόσμῳ ἀνελήφθη ἐν δόξῃ"
>Θεὸς

>>520479545
??? You can't read if you think I said something different.

>>520479652
See
https://biblehub.com/acts/1-9.htm#lexicon

>>520479566
>>520479585
Are you 'tarded? Please try reading carefully what I wrote in >>520479070 and/or in >>520479510.

>>520479652
>>520479683
https://biblehub.com/1_timothy/3-16.htm#lexicon

Wrong verse

>>520479701
Again, you massive clown shoe. John and Luke say different things, while Matthew and Mark say different things from John and Luke.

You simply cannot refute this

>>520470793
>P*otestantism is in its death throes
christianity as a whole is in its death throes.

>>520479510
>Cite the verses
Are you retarded?
>>520479359
>Matthew 27:46: "Eli, Eli, lema sabachthani? which means, 'My God, my God, why have you forsaken me?'"
>Mark 15:34: "Eloi, Eloi, lema sabachthani? which means, 'My God, my God, why have you forsaken me?'"

>>520478953
See
>>520479002
>>520479640

>>520469748 (OP)
It's time to wake and understnd the obvious truth that Christiaity is a sect of judaism

>>520479683
Your link's text from 3 manuscripts (the Minority Text, sometimes referred to as Nestle-Alands" or "UBS Text"), which are copyist mistakes or heretical sectarian changes. The VAST majority (over 5,000 manuscripts: the Majority Text) read Θεὸς (God), as I cited.

>>520479728
See
>>520479818

>>520479818
>which are copyist mistakes or heretical sectarian changes.
This is called poisoning the well.

You lose dumb shit

>>520469748 (OP)
Christianity was a jewish invention designed to keep dumb people dumb. Turn the other cheek, bitch!

>>520479850
See
>>520479865
>invents a cope

Lol you are a faggot

>>520479808
>my anti-Christian confirmation bias DEBUNKS you!!!
Kek. Now explain with your same reasoning how Jesus can say His disciples are greater than Him in Luke 22:27.

>>520479865
Then you're guilty of cherrypicking: 5,000 say God, but you picked 3 that desperately change "God" into "Who".

>>520479801
Where do Matthew or Mark say (like Luke says about "Father, into thine hands I commit my spirit") those were His LAST words?

>>520479901
Jesus does not say that His disciples are greater than Him in Luke 22:27. Instead, He uses a rhetorical question to contrast worldly standards of greatness with the values of His kingdom. He asks, "For who is greater, the one who reclines at the table or the one who serves? Is it not the one who reclines at the table?"

This acknowledges the conventional earthly hierarchy where the one who eats is considered greater than the one who serves. However, Jesus immediately states, "But I am among you as the one who serves," establishing that true greatness in His kingdom is found in humility and service, not in dominance or status. He sets Himself as the ultimate example of this principle, having just washed His disciples' feet, a task typically performed by a servant.

The passage emphasizes that in God's kingdom, greatness is not about being served but about serving others, and Jesus exemplifies this by His own actions and teachings.

Therefore, the verse does not claim the disciples are greater than Jesus, but rather teaches that true greatness is measured by humble service, a standard Jesus Himself embodies.

>>520480008
>Where do Matthew or Mark say (like Luke says about "Father, into thine hands I commit my spirit")
Why are you asking a question about something I never said?

>>520479957
>Then you're guilty of cherrypicking
Nope. This is another cope

>>520479773
You got me! Four different eyewitnesses have to plagiarize each other's homework to be telling the truth!

>>520479901
Luke 22:27 states, "For who is greater, the one who is at the table or the one who serves? Is it not the one who is at the table? But I am among you as one who serves". This verse is part of Jesus' teaching to his disciples that true greatness is found in serving, not in lording authority over others, a lesson he demonstrates through his own example. The context is a discussion among the disciples about which of them was the greatest, which Jesus redirects by emphasizing humility and service.

In Matthew 15:24, Jesus states, "I was sent only to the lost sheep of the house of Israel". This was said to a Canaanite woman, but it is not to be interpreted as a total rejection of Gentiles. Instead, the statement reflects a prioritization of His mission to the Israelites, the fulfillment of Old Testament prophecy about the Messiah gathering Israel, and served as a test of the woman's faith.

All in all, Jesus is a servant of Yahweh, sent to the house of Israel to gather them up into a new Jewish sect spin-off cult later called Christianity. Everything Jesus does is trying to get Jews into the fold of the new religion.

>>520480071
>You got me!
Sure did lol

That's why you keep coping lol

>>520480042
You claimed Matthew and Mark said those were Jesus' last words. Then where do either of them say those were His last words?

>>520480064
5,000 is a much greater number than 3, seething anon.

>>520480106
>Then where do either of them say those were His last words?
Are you retarded on purpose?
>>520479359
>Matthew 27:46: "Eli, Eli, lema sabachthani? which means, 'My God, my God, why have you forsaken me?'"
>Mark 15:34: "Eloi, Eloi, lema sabachthani? which means, 'My God, my God, why have you forsaken me?'"
How many times do I need to give you the verses?

>>520480121
You have no backing my man.

>>520477777
>>520479400
>>520479679
A blood sacrifoce was necessary, but only an Almighty and sinless one worked, which is stated to be Jesus.
>Hebrews 10:4
"For it is not possible that the blood of bulls and of goats should take away sins."
>Hebrews 10:12
"For it is not possible that the blood of bulls and of goats should take away sins."

>>520480151
Until the short circuit in his brain times out and he goes into reset mode. The next time you or anyone meets him, it will be as if the conversation you had with him never happened.

>>520469748 (OP)
can muttmericans even be considered Christians?

>>520480106
>it doesn't explicitly say!
the bible doesn't explicitly say a lot of things, anon.
were there any words of his written after that point, but prior to the resurrection? or were those... his final recorded words in those accounts (again, prior to resurrection)?

>>520480174
That's your confirmation bias and desperate selectiveness telling you that. I'm told that 5,000 is a bigger number than 3.

>>520480237
>A blood sacrifoce was necessary, but only an Almighty and sinless one worked
Why?

>>520480290
You keep making claims without backing them up
>>520480247
You nailed it lol

>>520480279
Wrong! Luke 23:46 explicitly says what Jesus' last (final) words were, while Matthew, Mark, and John never state "And having said THUS, he gave up the ghost."

>>520480237
An almighty god can surely go about his ways without demanding any human sacrifices. Yet Yahweh demands human sacrifices, child sacrifices, and especially child sacrifices, over and over and over again.

Are children innocent enough? Because he killed a shit ton of them.

>>520480258
Politicians and anyone who is bribed with riches, almost never. For another example of this, see the Vatican.

>>520480345
>while Matthew, Mark, and John never state
Kek, you keep making our points lmao

>>520480376
>Yet Yahweh demands human sacrifices, child sacrifices, and especially child sacrifices, over and over and over again.
Baumstein, name one person besides Isaac where He called for this.

>>520480345
that doesn't answer my question.
were there any words of his recorded after the fact in the accounts in question?
or were those his final recorded words in those instances?

>>520469748 (OP)
Kikes on /pol/ and kikes irl are saying the same thing, trying to claim Christianity as theirs.
You either have to accept or reject Christianity on the false premise that it's "jewish"

>>520480467
japheth. judges 11.

Imagine following an abrahamic desert death cult unironically

Muslim and Christian arguing live now get in here
https://www.youtube.com/live/MXm99LGHdtE

>>520480504
>pay no mind to the abominable and provably jewish practice of circumcision
>pay no mind to the foreign desert aesthetic of the bible
>it's totally not jewish, bro.

>>520480421
You keep changing your point, desperate faggot: first you say "Matthew, Mark, Luke, and John all say that Jesus' last words were--"
>no they don't: only Luke does
then you say, "Haha! I was only pretending to be retarded! I was ACTUALLY just saying that all four of them say different things in general"
>that's fine: historians state that slight differences verify eyewitness testimonies as eyewitness testimonies

Either point you deviate to verifies the New Testament, anon.

>>520480514
You mean Jephthah, and cite the verse you're trying to twist.

>>520480467
Ezekiel 20: 25-26

"Moreover, I gave them statutes that were not good and rules by which they could not have life, and I defiled them through their very gifts win their offering up all their firstborn, that I might devastate them. I did it that they might know that I am the Lord."

He also killed the first born Egyptian sons.

It goes on and on. Yahweh kills and demand the sacrifice of a LOT of children.

>>520480603
>first you say "Matthew, Mark, Luke, and John all say that Jesus' last words were--"
Different from each ither except Matthew and Mark.

>>520480603
>I was ACTUALLY just saying that all four of them say different things in general"
I never said this either

Your strawman attempt is terrible because you are a terrible person

Try again kiddo

>>520480574
Yeah yeah I know all your faggot takes. And Hitler was also jewish and everything is ackshually 4D chess.
Blow it out your ass.

>>520480635
>You mean Jephthah
oh, right. sorry, hebrew isn't my strong suit, so some of the names tend to blend together.

and it's not a single verse. i get that you can't be bothered to read the bible, but read judges 11 where he literally sacrifices his daughter to yahweh.
go on, you can do it. judges 11. it will take you 3 minutes tops.

>>520480658
>k-killing the Egyptian firstborn is the same as child sacrifice..b-because IT IS, OKAY????
Cope.
>>520480658
>Ezekiel 20:25-26
That says the exact opposite of what you want it to say, Goldstein. "Wherefore I gave them also statutes that were not good, and judgments whereby they should not live;
"And I polluted them in their OWN gifts, in that THEY caused to pass through the fire all that openeth the womb, that I might make them desolate, to the end that they might know that I am the LORD."
Or, as the following verse says,
>Romans 1:24
"Wherefore God also gave them up to uncleanness through the LUSTS (ie, desires) of THEIR OWN hearts, to dishonour their own bodies between themselves"

>>520480847
>And Hitler was also jewish
Jesus sure was

>>520480851
So cite the verse that God commands Jephthah to sacrifice his daughter, then, angry anti-Christian.

>>520480847
your strawmans don't address the point at all, really.
go ahead, enlighten us. show how circumcision and other such atrocities were totally White behaviors and totally not jewish.

>>520480864
>>k-killing the Egyptian firstborn is the same as child sacrifice..b-because IT IS, OKAY????
How is it not?

>>520480864
>Wherefore I gave them also statutes that were not good, and judgments whereby they should not live;
>"And I polluted them
Kek.

>>520480916
Why didn't God stop him like he did Abraham?

>>520480877
Yea you're repeating what the faggots in the OP picture would say.
I don't put stock in how kikes define things.

>>520481023
Are you conceding your only example of "God ORDERED child sacrifice"?

>>520480916
ah. you're trolling, got it.
i advise you pick a better subject to troll about, you don't want people to take you seriously when the culling begins.

>>520481026
Try reading your bible. It documents gow Jesus was a jew very well

>>520481091
Again,

>>520480949
>>>k-killing the Egyptian firstborn is the same as child sacrifice..b-because IT IS, OKAY????
>How is it not?
Why do you keep changing IDs?

>>520480933
>go ahead, enlighten us
I don't care what you believe or pretend to believe.
That post is for other people to get a clue, not for kikes pretending to be chuds and the few retards who believe that gayop.
You say the same things as zogbots IRL, but you want us to reject Christianity on your false premise.

>>520475786
It literally is. Melchizedek prophesied the birth of Jesus and Jesus is a high priest of the order of Melchizedek.

>>520481271
>everything is an attack on me!
Grow up or don't wonder into places that hurt your feelings

>>520469748 (OP)
Uhh it's Christendom, not Judaic-Christendom.

>>520481328
There is no direct biblical or historical evidence that Melchizedek prophesied the birth of Jesus

it's very amusing to watch christians get btfo when they beliefs are contradictory to their own book
this is probably why the church banned peasants from reading it for hundreds of years, it would've died out pretty quick without the priests running damage control 24/7

>>520481435
their*

>>520480864
>>> k-killing the Egyptian firstborn is the same as child sacrifice..b-because IT IS, OKAY????
>> Cope.

> It's okay for god to kill children if it's not a "child sacrifice"

You're mentally deranged.

Ezekiel 20:25-26 states that God gave the Israelites statutes and laws that were not good, and by which they could not live, because of their rebellion. The passage explains that God defiled them through their own sacrifices, including the offering of their firstborn, to horrify them and cause them to know that He is the Lord. Different translations offer slightly different wording but convey the same core message of God's judgment on Israel's sin.

Yahweh demanded those children to be sacrificed.

Again, the exact quote:

Ezekiel 20:25-26:

"So I gave them other statutes that were not good and laws through which they could not live; I defiled them through their gifts—the sacrifice of every firstborn—that I might fill them with horror so they would know that I am the Lord."

You can find many Bible versions, but they all say very plainly that Yahweh himself commanded these sacrifices to horrify his subjects into worshipping him.

>>520480949
>How is it not?
Atheist morality, everyone. Thank you for inspiring blue shitholes and Muslim areas everywhere to have unpunished "youths" because "THEY'RE CHIL-DREN!"
>>"And I polluted them
>selectively ignoring the words "own" and "they" in the verses to fit confirmation bias and quote-mine
Two verses above said He polluted evildoers with morality that made them uncomfortable (eg, the Ten Commandments, including "Thou shalt not kill."):
>Because THEY had not executed my judgments, but had DESPISED my statutes (including "Thou shalt do no murder."), and had polluted my sabbaths, and their eyes were after their fathers` idols."
Same for Romans 1:24 I cited above:
>Romans 1:21-23
"Because that, when they knew God, they glorified him not as God, neither were thankful; but became vain in their imaginations, and their foolish heart was darkened. Professing themselves to be wise, they became fools, and changed the glory of the uncorruptible God into an image made like to corruptible man, and to birds, and fourfooted beasts, and creeping things."

God allows men to willingly do evil sometimes, that they may be judged for it and to be made an example of evil to others. You are trying really hard to twist that into "Guy that says not to murder or rape murders other people, so it's OKAY for me, enlightened atheist, to do it!"

>>520481271
see >>520481107

don't get me wrong, i understand that if you know a handful of bible verses and common christcuck copes, it's rather easy to extract some (you)s from people.
but when all the packets are released, you're not going to be able to convince people that you were "just kidding".

>>520481168
Again what? Are you admitting God didn't order Jephthah to do wrong or not?

>Why do you keep changing IDs?
Posting using my data plan, to be honest.

>>520481435
in christian circles, you'll actually hear them sometimes tell people not to read the bible "because you'll surely misinterpret what's within".

but in reality, it's because they don't want their followers to see all the fuckshit contained within, they're better off if they just assume it's a mysterious and perfect book.

>>520481415
>doesn't understand Christophany
For me, in order to hold an antithesis towards a certain subject, I must understand said subject to a minute detail, else I would be spewing biased garbage that would signal an easy defeat from the people I'm trying to debate against.
Glad to see that anti-Christian threads are a retard town were the best jeets and jews gather to show the world they are indeed retarded.

>>520481505
>Atheist morality, everyone. Thank you for inspiring blue shitholes and Muslim areas everywhere to have unpunished "youths" because "THEY'RE CHIL-DREN!"
This says it all. You can't even answer the question. You instead avoid it with poisoning the well and red herrings.

You are a disingenuous and dishonest person

>>520481500
See
>>520481505
and stop posting partial quotes, Goldstein.

>>520481579
>Are you admitting God didn't order Jephthah to do wrong or not?
I never said he did you dumb shit

>>520471304
They can take the money, vote pro Israel and say some anodyne shit about standing with Israel.
They don't need to do tricks on it. They just really really want to.

>>520481608
Again,
>>520481415
>There is no direct biblical or historical evidence that Melchizedek prophesied the birth of Jesus

>>520481354
>don't wonder into places
I'll go in all your antichristian threads and point out you repeat the same things as zogbots.
>that hurt your feelings
The only onw who's asshurt is you because I rejected your zogbot interpretation and definition of Christianity.

>>520481721
>I'll go in all your antichristian threads
And cry how much you're a victim lol

>>520481702
Again, you are talking about theology and don't even understand the concept of a Christophany.
This is because you are low IQ and think that during a discussion about religion, which involves the metaphysical, you must look at it through an empirical lense.
I'd say 98 IQ, tops.

>>520481619
>sub 20 IQ response
Judgment on a nation is not child sacrifice, though atheistic gluttony falsely equivocates age with innocence. That's why Muslims and nigger teens (or older) are allowed to whatever they want without consequences in communist areas because "they're CHILDREN!"

>>520481721
>because I rejected your zogbot interpretation
Lol
>21 And when eight days were completed [a]for the circumcision of the Child, His name was called Jesus, the name given by the angel before He was conceived in the womb.

>>520481775
Again
>>520481415
>There is no direct biblical or historical evidence that Melchizedek prophesied the birth of Jesus

>>520481798
>Judgment on a nation is not child sacrifice
But killing all the first born is. Had this been any other God but your favorite one then you'd agree.

Not to mention the murder of babies from other tribes

>>520481806
>echolalia
So even lower than 98. Sad.

>>520481760
>And cry how much you're a victim lol
No I'll point out you have the same interpretation of Christianity as zogbots irl, as I did itt.
You can keep posting "u mad", and I'll keep saying what this is all about for others to see.

>>520481868
Next you make a claim Paco, back it you
>>520481415
>There is no direct biblical or historical evidence that Melchizedek prophesied the birth of Jesus

>>520481900
>>And cry how much you're a victim lol
>No
Yet you keep doing it lol

>>520481415
>>520481702
Paul said in Hebrews 7:1-24 that Melchisedec (spoken of in Genesis and Psalms) was a picture of Jesus.

>>520481900
>interpretation of Christianity
Kek.>>520481806
>>21 And when eight days were completed [a]for the circumcision of the Child, His name was called Jesus, the name given by the angel before He was conceived in the womb.

>>520481678
You seem to have a retarded understanding of the word "own". The word is being used in the context of "own gifts". Gifts to who? Yahweh. Why to Yahweh? Because Yahweh demanded it. How do we know Yahweh demanded child sacrifice? Because he says so:

> that I might fill them with horror so they would know that I am the Lord.

Yahweh is filling them with horror. They aren't doing it to themselves, Yahweh explicitly states "I might fill them with horror". Why? "so they would know that I am the Lord" This is fearing Yahweh at its highest level.

>>520481956
>Paul said
Again,
>>520481415
>There is no direct biblical or historical evidence that Melchizedek prophesied the birth of Jesus
Stay focused

>>520481862
Not all firstborns are children (some are adults, like if your dad has an older brother), and that's irrelevant. You're grasping at straws for what counts as "child sacrifice", typical of communist false equovication.

>>520472091
Yeah, that’s why Jews have mock funerals for family members who convert to Christianity.

>>520481929
>Yet you keep doing it lol
Doing what? Pointing out that kikes on /pol/ and kikes irl are pushing the same interpretation of Christianity as pro jewish?

>>520481909
It's so funny to see the low IQ thinking that they can rationalize everything through empiricism because they lack the intellect to understand archetypical manifestations of the human psyche.
Freud's perfect monkey.

>>520482026
>Not all firstborns are children
biblical account of the Tenth Plague (Exodus 11–12), the "firstborn" targeted by God included children—specifically, the firstborn sons of the Egyptians, from infants to older boys.

Stop the cope

>>520482052
>>Yet you keep doing it lol
>Doing what?
Crying

Also see
>>520481806
>21 And when eight days were completed [a]for the circumcision of the Child, His name was called Jesus, the name given by the angel before He was conceived in the womb.

>>520482065
Still not able to back your claim I see

>>520482006
Wrong, Talmud follower. Read the verses before your partial quotes you're trying to twist: they say God gave them up to do things they refused to change about. He polluted them according to THEM, ie, He told them to do things they hated doing, such as NOT killing their children.

Otherwise, where does God command anyone to burn their child to an idol? I can show you verses where He commands them NOT to do that.

>>520469748 (OP)
> Shabbas Goyim declares his cuckholdery
LOL!
Anyhow Christianity predates the talmudic cult.

>>520482119
I didn't say otherwise. You said this is child sacrifice, based purely on your desperate desire for it to be so to try to win an argument, since you were refuted on your only other example of Jephthah's daughter.

Child sacrifice would be God demanding a child's life as an offering to Him, not the mere killing of a child. That's the logical fallacy of false equivocation, because you're angrily getting desperate.

>>520482183
What you are saying does not conform at all to the explicit verse.

Ezekiel 20:25-26:

"So I gave them other statutes that were not good and laws through which they could not live; I defiled them through their gifts—the sacrifice of every firstborn—that I might fill them with horror so they would know that I am the Lord."

Yahweh gave them statutes.
Yahweh demanded child sacrifice as gifts
Yahweh did this to strike fear in them and make them worship him

Also, what you said doesn't even make sense. If the people were doing this willingly before Yahweh then why would Yahweh way that he is doing this to fill them with horror so they would know he is the Lord?

Cope

Yahweh is a bloodthirsty god, not much different than all the other gods in the Canaanite pantheon he comes from.

>>520469748 (OP)
I thank the Lord Jesus Christ for sending these dispensationalist heretics to hell where they belong for worshiping the synagogue of satan, Christians of /pol/!, I implore you, in the name of the Lord to repent to him for your sins of dispensationalism and come back to Jesus through the truth that is Supersessionism!, Amen.

>>520482311
>You said this is child sacrifice
And I was right. Lol

>>520482311
>you were refuted on your only other example of Jephthah's daughter.
Again, I never made that claim. You understand that right? This is twice now

>Child sacrifice would be God demanding a child's life as an offering to Him
Which is what happens when he damnds the death of babies and kills the first born

>>520482311
> Child sacrifice would be God demanding a child's life as an offering to Him, not the mere killing of a child.

> Muh god kills children directly, he didn't ask other to kill children for him, that's why it's better

Lmao

>>520469748 (OP)
Christianity was the I AM doctrine veiled for the piscean age, a judeo-masonic concoction, specifically Jupiter and the Sun in Pisces. Islam was Venus in Pisces. For the aquarian age the I AM doctrine will be veiled under the guise of AI and other technological creations.

Jesus = Je suis = Jeshua = Yah Weh = Jove = Jupiter = Zeus = Deus = I AM

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZftML6pAv7E

>>520469748 (OP)
>Christianity
>33 AD

>Judaism
>70 AD

>>520482360
You're still quote-mining (ignoring the context established Ezekiel 20:5-24 that these child sacrificers were polluted in their eyes by God telling them to NOT sacrifice children), but what were those statutes? Quote the statutes God is referring to. Can you show anywhere He commands child sacrifice (not just Him referencing them doing it out of rebellion against God, as in Ezekiel 20:26)?

>>520482401
What you're doing is called false equivocation to fit your confirmation bias. You still haven't shown a place where God demanded the blood of children as an offering to Him, which is why you're stalling with this.

>>520482448
See
>>520482628

>>520482580
>Can you show anywhere He commands child sacrifice
Sure
>17Now therefore, kill every male among the little ones, and kill every woman who has known man intimately. 18But all the girls who have not known man intimately, spare for yourselves.

>>520482628
>What you're doing is called false equivocation
Nope

>>520482628
>You still haven't shown a place where God demanded the blood of children as an offering to Him
Kek
>17Now therefore, kill every male among the little ones, and kill every woman who has known man intimately. 18But all the girls who have not known man intimately, spare for yourselves.

That's exactly what's happening here

>>520482580
Ezekiel 20:25-26:

"So I gave them other statutes that were not good and laws through which they could not live; I defiled them through their gifts—the sacrifice of every firstborn—that I might fill them with horror so they would know that I am the Lord."

> but what were those statutes? Quote the statutes God is referring to.

According to god:
> I gave them other statutes that were not good and laws through which they could not live

I don't know what they were, but that's irrelevant since Yahweh states that they were his laws and they were not good and laws they could not live under.

> Can you show anywhere He commands child sacrifice

According to god:
> I defiled them through their gifts—the sacrifice of every firstborn

Yahweh demand child sacrifice as their gifts. normally Yahweh demands things like animals or animals in substitution for children.

And he made it clear why he did this to:

> that I might fill them with horror so they would know that I am the Lord.

So basically just good old terrorism.

If you have a legitimate counter argument and accuse me of pulling things out of context, please provide the contextual quotes related to this verse which say something different. I read Ezekiel and have found nothing. Yahweh is very clearly using a fear tactic to gain control.

>>520482703
>>Can you show anywhere He commands child sacrifice
>Sure
>>17Now therefore, kill every male among the little ones, and kill every woman who has known man intimately.
Still false equivocation and reaching, not fitting the definition of child sacrifice.
>>18But all the girls who have not known man intimately, spare for yourselves.
And a deflection as well! lol

You're reaching really hard, but you still have failed to mention a command for a blood offering, which is what a human sacrifice is (hence Jesus' blood on the cross for your sin-loving blood).

>>520482884
>You're reaching really hard
Nah, God commanded it and it's to glorify God. That's exactly what a sacrifice does

>but you still have failed to mention a command for a blood offering
All these deaths God commands is an offering to Him as thats where they return.

C'mon kiddo. Have some better nuance

>>520482871
Also, this anon points a good example of child sacrifice and child rape as well:
>>520482703

>>520482871
>>but what were those statues? Quote the statutes God is referring to.
>I don't know what they were,BUT
Lol So you're just making things up to fit your bad argument. God's statutes are "Thou shalt NOT kill", which they hated (and which polluted their rebellious hearts), but He allowed them to do it anyway: tares among the wheat (iestoring up judgment), but no evidence of a command for a blood offering outside of your desperate confirmation bias.

>>520482965
Hes going to make up excuses of why it's ok and why it's not sacrifice

I pointed out that had this been any otqher God but his favorite one then he'd be agreeing.

>>520470288
>>520470227
>>520469895

>>520483020
*ie, storing up judgment)

>>520483044
Sacrifice is a demand for blood offering. You're upset because you can't show a verse where God demands this of anyone (but of Isaac or Jesus, fine).

>>520482965
>and child rape as well
Says nothing about sex there, and that's a deflection from your straw-grasping previous claim about commanding child sacrifice.

>>520483145
>Sacrifice is a demand for blood offering.
I've already covered this see
>>520482956

>>520470288
when will copestians stop already

>>520483192
>Says nothing about sex there
It doesn't need too. There is no other reason why the text explicitly says keep the virgin girls for yourself

>>520483203
No you didn't lol. You just desperately characterized that as a "blood offering" because you can't find a verse where God actually calls for them to be sacrificed to Him.

Are teenage murderers that get the death penalty "child sacrifices", too? Kek

>>520483020
Yahweh explicitly states that the laws he gave were laws where they could NOT live. Ie. they DIE

So saying "thou shalt NOT kill" is non-sense you made up.

Furthermore, Yahweh explicitly said that the gifts he demanded was child sacrifice:

> I defiled them through their gifts—the sacrifice of every firstborn

And he explains why he demanded the sacrifice of children:

> that I might fill them with horror so they would know that I am the Lord.

What's more horrifying, sacrificing your first born or NOT sacrificing your first born.

You sound incredibly stupid. Even Christian sources online admit Yahweh was clearly demanding child sacrifice but they justify it in the same way they justify Yahweh killing Egyptian children, or Yahweh killing male children and raping female children in Numbers. They just say the children are part of the enemy and therefor fair game.

How do you justify Numbers?

Numbers 31:17-18

Now therefore, kill every male among the little ones, and kill every woman who has known a man by sleeping with him. But all the young girls who have not known a man by sleeping with him, keep alive for yourselves.

So many shills trying to promote Christ niggery. The answer to the jq is to reject all things semitic, especially christ jewry

>>520483307
>No you didn't lol
Sure did

>>520483307
>verse where God actually calls for them to be sacrificed to Him.
See
>>520482703
>17Now therefore, kill every male among the little ones, and kill every woman who has known man intimately. 18But all the girls who have not known man intimately, spare for yourselves.
That's exactly what's happening

>>520483307
>Are teenage murderers
Now this is a false equivalency

You accuse others of what you do lol

>>520483272
Nice try. There were servant girls (aka, maidservants) then, and no, you weren't allowed to rape them. Hence why even Abraham had to marry Hagar before he could have sex with her.

>>520483390
Are teenage criminals that get the death penalty child sacrifices (to the State) or not?

>>520483412
>There were servant girls (aka, maidservants) then, and no, you weren't allowed to rape them.
Made up nonsense

>>520483454
Non-sequitor

>>520483454
>17Now therefore, kill every male among the little ones, and kill every woman who has known man intimately. 18But all the girls who have not known man intimately, spare for yourselves.

These are teenage criminals?

>>520469748 (OP)
"Rightwingers" are seething because he. Is. Right.
(Judeo-)Christianity is a totally jewish product with intrinsic jewish oversight built in.

>>520471921
total lies.
>Killed 80M europeans
Germans opposed juda heroically and where -again- stabbed in the back.
>Haavara agreement
was done in good conscience first and it made sense at the time, then phased out as more and more information came out and the Nazis allied with the arabs. Haavara was also effectively a miniscule thing, amounting to maybe one tiny village at best.
>poisoned norse symbols
He used Germanic symbols as befits our race.

If we remove the disinfo and clear mistakes, all you really say is
>he lost, me sad

He who argues like this is either the White man's (and especially all Germanics) enemy, insanely stupid. Or jewish.

SIEG HEIL

>>520483485
Classic communist saying that the death penalty is human sacrifice.

>>520483531
I nvwer said that. Why do you need to make up another lie?

christcucks worship a jew and jews laugh at them for it

>>520483514
Judgment does not equal sacrifice. I don't give my own money away to someone who needs it because I am judging them but because I am sacrificing for them.

>>520483586
>Judgment does not equal sacrifice
What kind of judgement does a baby deserve?

I called it too
>>520483044
>Hes going to make up excuses of why it's ok and why it's not sacrifice
Lmao

>>520483528
>opposed juda heroically
...by literally adopting Hertzl's zionism program word-for-word and creating the state of Israel?
Good job, faggot.

>>520483641
>>Judgment does not equal sacrifice
>What kind of judgement does a baby deserve?
So it's judgment (making right) and not sacrifice (an offering to someone)?

>>520483740
Again.>>520483641
>What kind of judgement does a baby deserve?
Or better yet. Why does a healthy baby deserve death if not for sacrificial purposes?

>>520483806
You're deflecting. You don't cast judgment on a nation (and then burn everything to the ground, as in your example) if you're sacrificing to appease your god. The people being JUDGED (Canaanites) were doing child sacrifice to their gods, which is why God destroyed these nations that refused to stop CHILD SACRIFICING, YOU COMPLETE RETARD LOL

>>520483898
Again
>>520483806
>Or better yet. Why does a healthy baby deserve death if not for sacrificial purposes?
Seems you're the one deflecting

>>520483898
>The people being JUDGED (Canaanites) were doing child sacrifice to their gods
Babies were committing child sacrifices? I don't think so Tim

>>520483898
>God destroyed these nations that refused to stop CHILD SACRIFICING, YOU COMPLETE RETARD LOL
By killing babies to glorify himself?

Sounds like a sacrifice

Judeo-Christian is an oxymoron. I never even heard this term until I was 40 and I am Catholic.

Judaism is the Old Testament (aka the Torah), it is about revenge, an eye for an eye.
Christianity is the New Testament (aka the Bible), it is about forgiveness, turn the other cheek.
Judaism is not the bearer of Christianity, but its antithesis.

Noah (not jewish)----> Abraham (not jewish)---->Isaac (not jewish)---->Jacob (not jewish)---->JUDAH is from whom the JEWS descended and they lived in JUDEA.
NONE of the biblical people BEFORE Judah are jews. It amazes me how many people do not know this.

There were 12 tribes of Israel from the 12 sons of Jacob.
ONLY the tribe from Jacob’s son Judah are ‘Jews’ (these were aka the Judaites), the other 11 Israel tribes are NOT Jewish. It also amazes me how many people do not know this, either.

Out of 2.3 B Christians, there are 7-10 M evangelicals that hope for jews to go back to israel, they follow the book of revelation, at which the other 2.3 B Christians laugh.

>>520484088
“Do not think that I have come to abolish the Law or the Prophets; I have not come to abolish them but to fulfill them. For truly I tell you, until heaven and earth disappear, not the smallest letter, not the least stroke of a pen, will by any means disappear from the Law until everything is accomplished” (Matthew 5:17–18).

> UNTIL HEAVEN AND EARTH DISAPPEAR

Try explaining that without omitting text or inserting heretical bullshit.

Here's what Jesus meant by the Heaven and Earth disappearing:

The Bible says heaven and earth will pass away at an event described as the "Day of the Lord," though the exact timing is not specified beyond its connection to Jesus' second coming and the end times. In Matthew 24:35, Jesus states, "Heaven and earth will pass away, but my words will never pass away". This verse is echoed in other scriptures like Mark 13:31 and Luke 21:33.

Matthew 24:35: "Heaven and earth will pass away, but my words will never pass away".

2 Peter 3:10: Describes the Day of the Lord as the time when "the heavens will be destroyed with a fiery blast, and the elements will be dissolved with intense heat".

Revelation 21:1: Mentions that "the first heaven and the first earth had passed away" before a new heaven and a new earth were created.

>>520483975
So how did this appease God (which is what a sacrifice is for)? Where does He specifically call for child sacrifice? Why would He destroy a nation for their child sacrifice if He wanted child sacrifice to continue? And why is it that God no longer demanded "child sacrifice" once the Canaanites were exiled from the land?

>>520484221
>So how did this appease God
See
>>520482956
>God commanded it and it's to glorify God. That's exactly what a sacrifice does
>>520484221
>Where does He specifically call for child sacrifice?
When he commanded the desthbof healthy and innocent babies

>>520484221
>Why would He destroy a nation for their child sacrifice if He wanted child sacrifice to continue?
Non-sequitor. The better question is why kill innocent babies who had nothing to do with the child sacrifices?

>>520484088
Paul called himself "a Jew from the tribe of Benjamin". The definition changed over time, but no, the politician in OP is falsely supporting Talmudists not anyone that could possibly be called a "righteous Jew".

>>520484172
"Fulfill" means "complete", as in "fulfill prophecy" (which the Law was). You're Jewish, intentionally trying to mislead people.

>>520484375
> "Fulfill" means "complete", as in "fulfill prophecy" (which the Law was). You're Jewish, intentionally trying to mislead people.

What does "complete" mean? Because Jesus explicitly says it does NOT mean abolish. And if the Law isn't abolished, that means it must be followed.

And Jesus also tells you exactly when they will be abolished, when Heaven and Earth disappear.

>>520484221
>>520484340
1 Samuel 15:3

Also shows that it doesn't even have to be about child sacrifice and God still commands the death of babies

>>520469748 (OP)
Literally half the new testament is Jesus fighting with jews about morality and theology but shill still go for the christian is jew religion angle. Pathetic really.

>>520484340
>it's to glorify God. That's exactly what a sacrifice does
Proof?
>>Where does He specifically call for child sacrifice?
>When he commanded the desthbof healthy and innocent babies
No, that's your reaching confirmation bias. Show me a verse where he specifically (SPECIFICALLY) asks for human blood or human sacrfice. Otherwise, admit you're reaching.
>>Why would He destroy a nation for their child sacrifice if He wanted child sacrifice to continue?
>Non-sequitor
Wrong, since you're making the desperate and unsupported claim that this is an example of child sacrifice. And you forgot to answer the last question: why did "His demand for child sacrifice" end once the Canaanites were exiled from the land?

Jesus!

>>520484572
>>it's to glorify God. That's exactly what a sacrifice does
>Proof?
Of?

>>520484572
>that's your reaching confirmation bias
No it isn't. That's exactly what happened. God killed innocent healthy babies.

>>520484572
>since you're making the desperate and unsupported claim that this is an example of child sacrifice
What other reason would a god command the desth of healthy and innocent babiesM

>>520484545
Christianity is a Jewish spin-off cult.
See
>>520472091

Bolsheviks and Mensheviks were also two opposing Jewish groups.

Jews, like all religious groups, can fracture and spin-off.

>>520484572
>And you forgot to answer the last question: why did "His demand for child sacrifice" end once the Canaanites were exiled from the land?
I didn't forget. I ignored it because it's irrelevant to what already took place

>>520469748 (OP)
>>520469748 (OP)
>>520469748 (OP)
Daily reminder that all the "no tail" and furfag posts are made by VPN niggers of a troon squad from iDrama and Valent Projects cuckademics to normalize degeneracy across the board.
Same trannies who shill for Jewkraine and make the /uhg/ threads btw.
https://archive.4plebs.org/pol/thread/518123762/#518129824
https://archive.4plebs.org/pol/thread/518281658/#518287969
https://archive.4plebs.org/pol/thread/518256371/#518256990

>>520484453
Fulfilled prophecy is not abolished, you absolute retard. That's why it can be cited: the whole Law was to SHOW US the cross (sacrifice for our sins the law makes us guilty of) and resurrection (the Lawgiver having the power over the sin the law condemns).

The Law's condemnation of sins STILL APPLIES hence why we NEED Jesus' SACRIFICE (since you're not rewarded for following a law but punished for breaking it: and since you can't pay the debt you owe for breaking it, you need someone to willingly make a sacrifice, of his own possessions, to pay it for you).

>>520484797
> Fulfilled prophecy is not abolished

I did not say it was.

The Law is only abolished when the Heaven and Earth disappear. Ie. the Apocalypse.

Otherwise, you must follow the Law of the Prophets (the Old Testament).

Jesus sacrificed just helped remove sin, so maybe you might not have to sacrifice animals and children to Yahweh anymore. But the other laws still apply.

>>520484493
>1 Samuel 15:3
Amalek was Canaanites (unrepentant child sacrificers). That's still judgment (AGAINST child sacrifice).

>>520484928
Yahweh commands the Israelites to kill everyone, man, woman, child, infant.

You would think an almighty god would have a better solution especially since children are considered more or less sinless and even Jesus states that killing a child is one of the worst sins imaginable.

>>520484921
Just stop angrily quote-mining, Jewish faggot. You're making a fool of yourself. Christ came to FLAWLESSLY fulfill prophecy outlined by the law: He can't replace it because HE IS the Law:
>Genesis 3:24-25
"Wherefore the law was our schoolmaster to bring us unto (legalistic Judaism? No,) Christ, that we might be justified by faith. But after that faith is come, we are NO LONGER under a schoolmaster."
>Hebrews 8:13
"In that he saith, A new covenant, he hath made the first old. Now that which decayeth and waxeth old is ready to vanish away."

>>520472574
Romans created Christianity, the rest converted.

>>520485040
That's a criticism of judgment, not an example of child sacrifice. You're switching topics again...

>>520485099
“Do not think that I have come to abolish the Law or the Prophets; I have not come to abolish them but to fulfill them. For truly I tell you, until heaven and earth disappear, not the smallest letter, not the least stroke of a pen, will by any means disappear from the Law until everything is accomplished” (Matthew 5:17–18).

> UNTIL HEAVEN AND EARTH DISAPPEAR

Try explaining that without omitting text or inserting heretical bullshit.

>>520485099
(or rather, the perfect LawMAKER)

>>520485148
I'm not making the argument you think I'm making. I'm just saying Yahweh explicitly commanded the mass murder of children.

>>520485178
You can keep repeating your same post, but fulfill will never mean continue. Jesus is the fulfillment of the Law and they that trust in Him are in the new covenant of His blood, forever fulfilling the Law with Him.

>>520485217
So we agree this is not an example of child sacrifice (regardless that you want to call it murder)?

>>520485247
And the old Law is not abolished UNTIL HEAVEN AND EARTH DISAPPEAR

Has the earth disappeared? No. That means the old Law must be followed and enforced.

>>520485309
Yes, it's not a child sacrifice, it's just much worse, the mass murder of children.

>>520469748 (OP)
Jews have vids of him fucking kids

>>520485326
>till all be fulfilled
Which it was on the cross: John 19:30.

>>520485356
Thanks, so you were wrong (or purposefully lied) about God loving human sacrifice earlier.

>>520485437
(The only human sacrifice that ever appeased God was Jesus', since you have to 1. be sinless to cover sin and 2. have divine power to destroy sin)

>>520485437
No he still had child sacrifice, such as in Ezekiel 20: 25-26

Yahweh killed a lot of children either directly, commanding his followers to kill children, or demanding child sacrifice. Lots and lots of children.

>>520485437
>>520485505
>>520485511

Ezekiel 20: 25-26

"Moreover, I gave them statutes that were not good and rules by which they could not have life, and I defiled them through their very gifts win their offering up all their firstborn, that I might devastate them. I did it that they might know that I am the Lord."

>>520485511
Ezekiel 20:1-24 says Ezekiel 20:25-26 was not of God but of rebellion from hating God's commands. You're still jumping around (because you are trying to justify your own wrongdoings, including by being a liar as witnessed in this thread).

>>520485605
God commanded them to give child sacrifice as gifts so as to horrify them into worshipping him.

The text is plain and obvious.

>>520485603
That's a rough translation, but you're still quote-mining: it was not good to THEIR TASTES (since they wanted to be child sacrificers like the nations around them were), which God eventually allowed to fulfill "that he might devastate them"....FOR CHILD SACRIFICE THEY WANTED TO COMMIT.

>>520485723
Yahweh explicitly stated that he gave them laws of which they could not live, he commanded child sacrifices so he could devastate them and make them worship him.

Find a verse that says this is all false.

>>520485665
No, you're intentionally leaving out the text above your quotation in order to insert your false interpretation into it. That's called quote-mining. Ezekiel 20:1-24 says they hated His commands AGAINST child sacrifice, which "polluted"(ie, made God distasteful in their eyes).

>>520485813
Find a verse that verbatim says God commanded child sacrifices. I already cited you the first 24 verses of the same chapter where He commanded them to not child sacrifice.

>>520485838
Show the actual verse. Copy paste.

>>520485964
Here's Ezekiel 20:18-24
18. But I said unto their children in the wilderness, Walk ye not in the statutes of your fathers, neither observe their judgments, nor defile yourselves with their idols:
19. I am the LORD your God; walk in my statutes, and keep my judgments, and do them;
20. And hallow my sabbaths; and they shall be a sign between me and you, that ye may know that I am the LORD your God.
21. Notwithstanding the children rebelled against me: they walked not in my statutes, neither kept my judgments to do them, which if a man do, he shall even live in them; they polluted my sabbaths: then I said, I would pour out my fury upon them, to accomplish my anger against them in the wilderness.
22. Nevertheless I WITHDREW mine hand, and wrought for my name`s sake, that it should not be polluted in the sight of the heathen, in whose sight I brought them forth.
23. I lifted up mine hand unto them also in the wilderness, that I would scatter them among the heathen, and disperse them through the countries;
24. Because they had not executed my judgments, but had despised my statutes, and had polluted my sabbaths, and their eyes were after their fathers` idols.
(Ezekiel, 20)
>withdrew

>>520485838
All verses in Ezekiel 20 : 1-24 only say that Yahweh was insulted by the Israelites continuing to worship Egyptian gods and this made him angry. He did not say they were sacrificing children.

The child sacrifice only starts to be mentioned in Ezekiel 20: 25-26 when Yahweh commands them to commit child sacrifice so as to horrify them and make them know that he is the Lord.

>>520485964
Now, I'm aware you probably have never read the entirety of this chapter before and simply found a site where v. 25-26 were cited as "commanding child sacrifice." But that's the very issue why you're being rebuked as being dishonest and seeking to justify your own bias instead of being for the truth.