>>520499520
>>520499788
America wasn’t a neutral party also it doesn’t matter how much oil America produced because it’s bottlenecked by refining and by how much of it can be used.
The U.S. alone couldn’t defeat Germany due to German tactical supremacy on the battlefield.
The U.S. could not use all that fuel. They didn’t have the capacity to put that many tanks into Europe, furthermore only so many tanks can be at the front, and the U.S. can only field so many men and only train so many men.
It’s not realistic to assume multiple administrations would carry on a war on another continent. It could happen, but would it end in a deal? Likely.
If Germany defeated the USSR or defeated Britain, the U.S. would want peace with Germany. The U.S. foreign policy at the time was a lot of jewish diplomacy and bandwagoning on the stronger horse.
If the USSR went down the U.S. would have no way of recouping the cost for the huge investments we poured into them.
Everyone forgets this, Stalin didn’t industrialize the USSR. Morgan, Hammer, Studebaker, Kahn, and Ford did.
Out of some 1,400 factories in the USSR in 1941 over 1,000 of them were directly shipped from the U.S. with a few hundred more constructed over there by U.S. co.
Unbelievable?
The U.S. economy on 1930 was larger than the other top 5 economies COMBINED.
We were huge.
Why? We were a continent sized country filled with 150m Northern Europeans.
It’s not a surprise we were what we were.
If Germany was the stronger horse, strong enough to overrule Jewish influence I mean, we would have sided with them. For this to happen after the war breaks out, they would need to defeat the USSR or UK.