>>520552411
I'd say it's probably the kikes. They are usually the safe bet when fuckalry is about.
>>520553061
What you do and what you need depends on the target, but there are general setups. You need a decent sized telescope, 60-200mm lense or mirror size is what can comfortably be used without an observatory. I have an 80/1000 apocromatic refractor. First you point the rig (tripod, polar scope, telescope, finder scope, imaging camera and guide camera) to the north star polaris. That is the only star that won't really move, so you want your rig to pivot around that. If you'll be imaging deepsky objects, point to sirius (a bright binary star) and set the focus. If you'll be imaging planets, set it to the moon first, then adjust for the planet later. Then you find your target by pointing to the nearest obvious object then hopping from star to star.
Now you need to follow the target, as the sky rotates around us (technically we spin, but whatever). You set the guidescope and guide camera to the closest bright object to your target. Launch the PhD2 software, this will track this bright object, and move your telescope to follow it.
If your target is a planet, you take a video. The air moves, and you can never get a 100% clear image. It will be like waves distorting the planet. But you in every frame get some sharp regions.
If it is a deepsky object, it will be very faint, so you need long exposures to gather enough light for a good image. I like 5 min exposures, around 3-5 hours worth of them.
In the case of a planet video, there is an algorithm that will select the focused regions from any frame and disgard all others, doing this for every frame untill you get a fully sharp image.
In the case of deepsky images, you layer each 5 min exposure on top of eachother in an additive way, so the brightness and detail is as if you had taken a 3-5 hour exposure.