>>520696864
>30,000 years is appropriate because that’s when the term “native” was first applied to them, ie when cabot discovered north america. that is the threshold for both their existence and etymology of the word. here (You) are writing angry essays and the truth is so obvious it’s just another bullet point in basic history
You do not know what the word etymology means.
30,000 years ago native wasnt a word. The concept didn't exist. We invented that concept a few thousand years ago. A monkey does not think about how its native to anywhere. It just eats bananas and flings shit.
Right now were asking the question, "what makes something native". Or more specifically, "when does something become native" in general. In all cases. Thats how defining terms works. Not specifically to the cabot. All groups in the world.
If its the amount of time, then you are not native to here. You've been here for a very small portion of human existence. What's 30,000 compared to 1,000,000?
You know your argument sucks. Thats why you refuse to address most of what I say. Boo hoo. Get over it Dances-with--shitty-ideas