Thread 520820633

It was NATO and The West that violated the Yalta agreement of 1945.

The west has put it's in a corner by claiming to be "civilized society".
Because of this they can not defend or use force.

As every human rights organization would file legal challenges for:
> excessive use of force, resulting in death or damages

Putin and the like can do as they please.
They will ignore any legal challenges or international pressure.

> international pressure, something the west caves to quickly

>>520820633 (OP)
Ok

All of this geopolitical stuff is not so important until there are opposing forces.

In the west, liberal democracy is not so liberal anymore, because gays imported a bunch of immigrants and the indigenous/right wingers can not win elections anymore. Even if Trump or Farage wins one election, it is over, the indigenous get displaced.

The fate of the world rests on Russia winning the Ukraine war because we need a part of the world preserved from the gay menace which hijacks and destroys liberal democracies.

America is not a meritocracy but a gay soviet union.

Bussy is so sweet but IT IS NOT PERMITTED, JUST LIKE INCEST. Gays need to keep their dicks in their pants.

>>520820633 (OP)
Thats what you doing its time to remove zog international food feast

The only thing I'm not sure about is that hypothetically, if we killed all the gays, would we have world peace? On the one hand, gays fuck things up by pushing for war (Jews do this too, like when they opened the doors for the muslims or the mongols, but Jews' are finite in number and their agenda is finite), and without gays pushing for war, there would be less of it. On the other hand, right wingers can be real assholes, thinks about all the irredentists in history. This is why I called myself the Antichrist:

Hypothetically, if we killed all the gays, we could have world peace, but I am not sure the right wingers of the world, unbridled, would fuck things up. Besides gays, there are gay adjacent ideologies like Christianity.

But I have witnessed how EVIL globo homo is. You think its all roses and flowers, but you can be sure globo homo is militant and pursuing its enemies absolutely ruthlessly.

I think globo homo needs to be stopped.

Gays have this concept of 'Zion' like in the movies the Matrix, the only problem is it will come with the cost of everyone else in the world living in non meritocratic sludge shitholes with shit living conditions for indigenous people.

Sorry but gay sex is prohibited just like incest.

Gay sex needs to be strictly prohibited or it causes the world to turn into boring sludge and it causes wars.

The cia is a bunch of faggots and they need to lose in Ukraine, and all the gaya need to be killed.

I'm so very sorry to ruin this kumbaya world and I know I seem like satan and i do recognize that right wingers can be scum but bussy will lead to the destruction of the entire world.

>>520820633 (OP)
>Yalata 1945
>Grobachev
Zigger I...

>>520820633 (OP)
Genuinely don't care, it was zigzogs that violated Afganistan's sovereignty's first and they pressured north korea to invade the south. Not even gonna extrapolate the Vietnam discussion

>>520820633 (OP)
>NATO and The West that violated the Yalta agreement of 1945.
4 years before it existed.

>>520820665
>>520821662
>>520821723

>>520821894
Then why is """nato""" mentioned at the meeting in 1945?

>>520821963
Post the map of the axis powers from 1941, that's from before Yalta and it cancels it out

>>520822017
Because it wasn't. It's a very simple explanation that you're referencing a fake document.

>>520822017
Because that's from a discussion between Gorbaciov and whoever was he talking to about yalta, after nato was formed. Gorbaciov didn't rule in 1945, are you not capable of reading and understanding a text?

>>520822142
Yatla argreement was ratifed by the UN, the holy church you cling onto

>>520822017
Also go to school, you're illiterate. Post after you graduate uni, if you can. We can tell you're 15.
All being said at least it's good that you want to learn history

>>520822286
No it wasn't, it's only between the USSR, USA and UK. UN didn't exist and never had a motion to ratify an agreement they weren't a party of.

>>520820633 (OP)
Russia lost.

>>520822286
3rd party members cannot ratify an agrement.
If me and you sign a contract
>>520822368 he for example cannot ratify it.
Only us the signatory parts with exceptions that I'm not going through but those exceptions don't apply to treaties between nations

What blew up in ziggeria today? This is like the tenth time I've seen this old kremlin lie pop up in recent days. Clearly they are rotating their scripts again.

>>520820633 (OP)
>>520821662
>>520821963
So now they use cadet-kindergarten kids to work in the troll farms?

>>520822343
I learned my history from Assassin's Creed series.

>>520823057
Which is 80% accurate, the rest of 20% you have to read about. Go to school, finish uni don't listen to the fags that claim trades are good.

>>520820633 (OP)
>Putin and the like can do as they please.
>They will ignore any legal challenges or international pressure.

Does your brown brain even understand what "legal" means?

Some non-binding promises and cheap words to foolish Slavs are not laws.

Russians got what they wanted: a Coca-Cola bottle for betraying the communist cause and selling off their Warsaw Pact satellites to NATO. It was a fair deal.

Russia is only angry because here many think that we could get more than just a Coca-Cola bottle.

>>520820633 (OP)
Russia expanded eastward into Chechnya and Georgia

>>520823670
*westwards

>>520823670
That was justified

>>520823789
FAFO.

You're just a whinning brown loser with the same thug mentality as Putin.

>>520823789
>That was justified
The nato expansion is also justified and there is nothing to discuss.

>>520823959
There is an agreement that does not allow nato to expand

There is no agreement that prevent putin

learn the difference

>>520824026
>There is an agreement that does not allow nato to expand
Which one?

>>520820633 (OP)
This didn’t even rise to a signed statement by a sitting President much less a binding treaty ratified by the senate much less a modification to the North Atlantic treaty ratified by the other member states. The HW Bush administration felt this way but his successors did not. That’s how our Republican system functions. If Muscovy wanted a real permanent solution they should have offered something in consideration. They never did.

>>520820633 (OP)
vae victis, as the Romans got told.
The defeated have nothing to say in their fate.
Russia was thoroughly defeated in 1990. NATO could have chosen to exterminate them all at will. They did not.

>>520824026
>agreement
Care to name the people who have signed it?

Ziggerinos are not sending their best

>>520824053
There is none. It was a gentlemen’s agreement that ceased to be meaningful once those gentlemen were no longer in power.

>>520824026
>There is an agreement that does not allow nato to expand

There has never been such an agreement, you dork. Show them if they exist.

You quoted some promises to Gorbachev from the then US Secretary of State James Baker.

>>520824053
Yalta Agreement

>>520824210
Joseph Stalin, Winston Churchill, Franklin D. Roosevelt

>>520824328
How dare you betray the Great Soviet?

>>520824425
>Yalta Agreement

Lol. Do you even know when NATO was created?

> Western Betrayel
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Western_betrayal

>>520824425
>Yalta Agreement
Agreement between who?

>>520824425
Which chapter of Yalta agreement? What is the exact text of it? Who signed it and when?

>>520824476
Betray who? Traitors? Lmao.

You can suck Putin's cock but he will betray you shitskins as well, like Syria.

>>520820633 (OP)
so much fail:
>mentions Yalta while showing extracts of German reunification talks with conclusion "yes we can think and maybe discuss about it"...