Anonymous
(ID: Xo2aHkn1)
11/9/2025, 1:30:47 PM
No.520976323
[Report]
>>520976638
>>520976718
>>520976919
>>520977424
>>520977702
11/9/2025, 1:30:47 PM
No.520976323
[Report]
>>520976638
>>520976718
>>520976919
>>520977424
>>520977702
Right are losing in the US (and also in western Europe) because they lack scientific legitimacy and appear backwardish. Denying virtue of the scientific progress won't persuade normies for right cause BUT
What if we un-Popper science within new ideological framework? We separate true science (positivist/predictive: i.e. STEM and economy) and parascience (anti-positivist/interpretative: i.e. social "sciences").
Parascience is the problem, because its basicly ideology (experts recite each other's interpretation of facts) appearing as le Science, which normies love because of electricity, medicine and tasty food. "Experts" should not be called experts/researchers/scientists, because it implies objectivity which is absent in social studies
What if we un-Popper science within new ideological framework? We separate true science (positivist/predictive: i.e. STEM and economy) and parascience (anti-positivist/interpretative: i.e. social "sciences").
Parascience is the problem, because its basicly ideology (experts recite each other's interpretation of facts) appearing as le Science, which normies love because of electricity, medicine and tasty food. "Experts" should not be called experts/researchers/scientists, because it implies objectivity which is absent in social studies
