>>521106580 (OP)
>Why does American defence equipment suck this hard.
It doesn't, or else chinsects wouldn't be making shitty copies of it. Also, you WebM is of a minimum energy test launch of the F-35C fully loaded for combat to guarantee that even in the worst cases, A US Navy super carrier is able to launch a fully loaded F-35C ready for combat. The chinsect launch is of an empty J-35 in full after burner with just enough fuel to take-off and land right away (based on how high the landing gear is riding) in purfect weather, no waves, and in port for external - and more importantly, internal CHINER STRONK propaganda. If chiner was so gleat, you chinsects would actually live there and not the West, and you wouldn't have to tell everyone online 24/7 how gleat it is. It would be self-evident.
>low iq chink is still posting this
Grim
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dq-juyXvIcE
https://www.twz.com/33689/code-brown-as-this-f-35c-sinks-to-just-above-the-waves-after-taking-a-low-power-catapult-shot
>Something you don’t see everyday…low energy catapult launch! That sink is scary, but it was a part of the test plan. The folks at PAX River needed to find the lowest amount of energy that the catapult needed in order to safely launch an F-35C…they definitely found it! Through a smart build up and mitigation the test professionals go where others don’t
>for 2 trillion dollars, you'd expect a decent take-off.
Like WebM?
>Chinese manufacturers are able to produce twice as efficient systems for a quarter of the price.
Proof?
>What is the reason for this obviously glaring discrepancy?
Fragile chinsect egos needing to lie to cope with reality.
